NCBI ROFL: An army of om nom nom.

By ncbi rofl | August 18, 2010 9:00 am

1052383417_fba0fd9cb3_z
Food acceptability in field studies with US army men and women: relationship with food intake and food choice after repeated exposures.

“Laboratory data with single exposures showed that palatability has a positive relationship with food intake. The question addressed in this study is whether this relationship also holds over repeated exposures in non-laboratory contexts in more natural environments. The data were collected in four field studies, lasting 4-11 days with 307 US Army men and 119 Army women, and comprised 5791 main meals and 8831 snacks in total. Acceptability was rated on the nine point hedonic scale, and intake was registered in units of 1/4, 1/2, 3/4, or 1 or more times of the provided portion size. Correlation coefficients between individual acceptability ratings and intakes varied from 0.22 to 0.62 for the main meals (n=193-2267), and between 0.13 and 0.56 for the snacks (n=304-2967). The likelihood of choosing a meal for the second time was positively related to the acceptability rating of the meal when it was consumed for the first time. The results reinforce the importance of liking in food choice and food intake/choice behavior. However, the magnitude of the correlation coefficients between acceptability ratings and food intake suggest that environmental factors also have an important role in determining intake and choice.”

eat_food_liked

Photo: flickr/ Randy Son Of Robert

Related content:
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Eating behavior and obesity at Chinese buffets.
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Optimizing the sensory characteristics and acceptance of canned cat food: use of a human taste panel.
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: This just in: Children like to play with food!!!

WTF is NCBI ROFL? Read our FAQ!

CATEGORIZED UNDER: duh, eat me, NCBI ROFL
  • Jumblepudding

    Nobel prize. Just…close the nominations now.

  • Piehole

    Clearly, there is an urgent need for further research in this field. FOr example, is disliking food correlated with the likelihood of selecting something else in the future? Etc.

  • Lisa

    That isn’t an Army soldier that is a United States Marine in the picture!

  • JakeR

    Back when it was testing C-rations about the end of WWII, the Army conducted extensive tests on this question with the same general findings. Interestingly, they found that calories don’t count so much if the food is less palatable, an important consideration in the then-brewing Korean “police action.”

  • Bucherm

    To repeat what Lisa said, that there is a Jarhead, not a Soldier.

    (And yes there is a difference)

NEW ON DISCOVER
OPEN
CITIZEN SCIENCE
ADVERTISEMENT

Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!

Discoblog

Quirky, funny, and surprising science news from the edge of the known universe.

About ncbi rofl

NCBI ROFL is the brainchild of two Molecular and Cell Biology graduate students at UC Berkeley and features real research articles from the PubMed database (which is housed by the National Center for Biotechnology information, aka NCBI) that they find amusing (ROFL is a commonly-used internet acronym for "rolling on the floor, laughing"). Follow us on twitter: @ncbirofl

ADVERTISEMENT

See More

ADVERTISEMENT
Collapse bottom bar
+

Login to your Account

X
E-mail address:
Password:
Remember me
Forgot your password?
No problem. Click here to have it e-mailed to you.

Not Registered Yet?

Register now for FREE. Registration only takes a few minutes to complete. Register now »