DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Discoblog
« Google Street View Goes to Antarctica, Brings Maps to the Penguins
AAAAIIEEE! Tennis Players’ Grunts May Help Their Game »

NCBI ROFL: Does semen have antidepressant properties?

condoms“In a sample of sexually active college females, condom use, as an indirect measure of the presence of semen in the reproductive tract, was related to scores on the Beck Depression Inventory. Not only were females who were having sex without condoms less depressed, but depressive symptoms and suicide attempts among females who used condoms were proportional to the consistency of condom use.For females who did not use condoms, depression scores went up as the amount of time since their last sexual encounter increased. These data are consistent with the possibility that semen may antagonize depressive symptoms and evidence which shows that the vagina absorbs a number of components of semen that can be detected in the bloodstream within a few hours of administration.”

|

|

semen

Thanks to Ahnika for today’s ROFL!

Photo: flickr/Diamond Farah

Related content:
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Those are the [condom] breaks.
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: [Insert oral sex joke here].
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Finally, a male contraceptive: behold the ball cozy!

WTF is NCBI ROFL? Read our FAQ!

Share

October 1st, 2010 7:00 PM by ncbi rofl in analysis taken too far, holy correlation batman!, NCBI ROFL, penis friday, scientist...or perv? | 8 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

  • http://Untitledvanityproject.blogspot.com Rhacodactylus

    Hmmm, very interesting, but isn’t it also likely that certain personality types are less likely to use a condom, and that those same personality types might be likely to determine self worth based on sexual encounters?

    I’m not saying in any way that that is the case, I’m just saying that with retrospective studies it’s hard to make claims for the effects of a substance, even one as awesome as semen.

    ~Rhaco

  • http://Untitledvanityproject.blogspot.com Rhacodactylus

    This explains those old detergent commercials where the tube socks danced their way into the wash.

    ~Rhaco

  • LuchinG

    Of course they weren´t depresive; they were just risk junkies.

  • Jinian

    Depressives are more realistic, part n.

  • http://irishwishesarespecial.blogspot.com Sinead

    Shhh people above, study says have more sex! Let’s just run with that =P

  • http://www.zenmischief.com Keith

    There is, of course, a much simpler explanation. Who likes condoms? Probably almost no-one. So anyone having sex without a condom is going to feel better — it’s a better experience, something not to have to worry about, and a fairly yeuchy contraption not to have to use. GOK how you control for that though.

  • Cathy

    I believe they should have controlled for whether the girls in question were in a monogamous relationship. Usually, only a girl in a long term, stable relationship will risk unprotected sex (in college anyway – teens are much stupider.) This could be the reason she isn’t showing as many depressed symptoms, compared to her single swinger counterparts. The study should have also controlled for whether a girl is on birth control, which is the other major reason she might not be using a condom.

  • Sarah

    This is definitely an advantage of a monogamous heterosexual marriage versus the other forms of sexual relationships.





    • About the Blog

      Discoblog is DISCOVER's compendium of quirky, funny, and surprising science news from the edge of the known universe. It's written by Veronique Greenwood and Valerie Ross. Email tips and suggestions to vgreenwood [at] discovermagazine [dot] com.

      Discoblog also includes the daily feature NCBI ROFL, in which two prone-to-distraction grad students post real scientific articles with funny subjects. Email your tips to ncbirofl [at] gmail.com. Follow the ROFL feed here.

    • Twitter

      Follow @discovermag
    • Facebook

    • Twidget

      Add Tweets
    • Archives

      Archives

      • May 2012
      • April 2012
      • March 2012
      • February 2012
      • January 2012
      • December 2011
      • November 2011
      • October 2011
      • September 2011
      • August 2011
      • July 2011
      • June 2011
      • May 2011
      • April 2011
      • March 2011
      • February 2011
      • January 2011
      • December 2010
      • November 2010
      • October 2010
      • September 2010
      • August 2010
      • July 2010
      • June 2010
      • May 2010
      • April 2010
      • March 2010
      • February 2010
      • January 2010
      • December 2009
      • November 2009
      • October 2009
      • September 2009
      • August 2009
      • July 2009
      • June 2009
      • May 2009
      • April 2009
      • March 2009
      • February 2009
      • January 2009
      • December 2008
      • November 2008
      • October 2008
      • September 2008
      • August 2008
      • July 2008
      • June 2008
      • May 2008
      • April 2008
      • March 2008
      • February 2008
      • January 2008
      • December 2007
      • November 2007
      • October 2007
      • September 2007
      • August 2007
      • July 2007
      • June 2007
      • May 2007
      • April 2007
      • February 2007
      • January 2007
      • December 2006
      • November 2006
      • October 2006
      • September 2006


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us