DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Discoblog
« NASA and Etsy Team Up to Get Their Space Craft(ing) On
NCBI ROFL: Detection and management of pornography-seeking in an online clinical dermatology atlas. »

Get Your Steampunk On: This Guy’s Building a Computer From 1837

Analytical-EngineWhat would you do with a spare $640,000? John Graham-Cunning would build a steam-powered computer invented in the 1830s.

And instead of waiting around for this mysterious spare money to show up, he’s started soliciting donations. The plan: Raise the money by January 2011, build the analytical engine from Charles Babbage‘s original design, then donate the machine to a museum. Graham-Cunning knows this idea sounds crazy, but it won’t deter him, as he wrote in an article for the O’Reilly Radar:

It might seem a folly to want to build a gigantic, relatively puny computer at great expense 170 years after its invention. But the message of a completed Analytical Engine is very clear: it’s possible to be 100 years ahead of your own time.

If the analytical engine had been built when Babbage thought it up, it would have satisfied all the requirements for a computer, Graham-Cunning told The Telegraph:

“What you realize when you read Babbage’s papers is that this was the first real computer. It had expandable memory, a CPU, microcode, a printer, a plotter and was programmable with punch cards. It was the size of a small lorry and powered by steam but it was recognizable as a computer.”

But the designs were never built, and the world had to wait more than 100 years for the invention of mechanical computers in the 1940s. The analytic engine was designed to replace “computers”–people who wrote out mathematical tables–which would also have been the first example of a person’s job being replaced by a computer. Graham-Cumming explained the machine to The Independent:

“The big difference between it and machines which came 100 years later was that the programme was stored externally, in punch cards,” explained Mr Graham-Cumming. “It is basically a giant number-crunching machine–which is effectively what modern computers are today, it’s just that those numbers appear to us as words or images on a screen.”

And while it sounds like it shouldn’t be that hard to recreate something from the 1800s, there are plenty of confounding factors complicating this project, including the fact that a working model has never been built, says Gizmodo:

Babbage may’ve passed away in 1871, but more than a hundred years later and his computer (which would have run on punched cards containing the programs) still hasn’t ever been fully built. In 1910 his son built part of it, which was able to calculate an incorrect list of pi multiples—but it wasn’t programmable. And who needs a computer than calculates false numbers?

Oh, also, there are no firm set of plans with which to build one from, so they are going to have to go through all of Babbage’s documents to figure out a working design. The plan is to test the designs on a (modern) computer before going through the building process.

When it is fully built, the machine will be about the size of a small steam locomotive, and will be powered by steam. If the project hadn’t been scrapped, imagine how Victorian society would have changed, and how much more evolved technology would be today. We might even have had flying cars by now! Frig!

Related content:
80beats: Steam-Powered Car Breaks a Century-Old Speed Record
Discoblog: Circuit Board Chic: Motherboards Recycled Into Shoes & Underwear
Discoblog: New Robot Would Fuel Itself on Grass, Wood, Human Corpses
DISCOVER: A Look at the World’s First Computer
DISCOVER: Tomorrow’s Computer

Image: Flickr/Gastev

Share

October 15th, 2010 6:26 PM Tags: analytical engine, charles babbage, computer, steam engine, steampunk
by Jennifer Welsh in Technology Attacks! | 7 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

  • LuchinG

    ¿Can It play Pong, at least?

  • http://Untitledvanityproject.blogspot.com Rhacodactylus

    If we are really lucky, it will become sentient, develop a time machine, go back in time and stop the steam punk trend from getting this annoying

    ~Rhaco

  • Brian Too

    Uh, this was already done by IBM in 2000. They did it to prove that Babbage’s advanced machine (which he designed but never built) would in fact have worked. And thereby qualifies as the worlds first computer design.

    It turns out that it does work although it requires a lot of hand cranking. The original story was a little lower key than it might otherwise have been, because every expert already accepted Babbage’s design and it was expected to work correctly.

    I don’t remember the steam part though. The Analytical Engine was hand cranked. What’s that about?

  • http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/ Eliza Strickland

    Brian Too: I haven’t seen anything about IBM completing an analytical engine — are you sure they didn’t construct one of his earlier designs, the difference engine?

    Here’s the only thing I found from IBM on the analytical engine, which repeats the information (seen elsewhere) that it was meant to be steam-powered, and that it was never built.

    Cheers,
    Eliza, DISCOVER online news editor

  • Brian Too

    Well it was 10 years ago after all, so I don’t have the references handy!

    However I distinctly remember that IBM built the machine that Babbage was never able to. And your link, it takes you to a page with a picture of a complex device and it’s headlined “Analytical Engine”. I’d think that means something?

    The whole project was one of those vanity/historical spelunking exercises. Also it was an anniversary of sorts, whether of Babbage or IBM, I don’t remember.

    After some checking around, here’s the only reference I could find. It’s quite unsatisfactory all in all.

    http://www.yale.edu/ynhti/curriculum/units/1981/6/81.06.01.x.html

    It says, “Several years ago IBM constructed an Analytical Engine according to Babbage’s original drawings…” The article itself is dated 2010.

    Most of the other references I came up with were to the Science Museum of London. One article said that Nathan Myhrvold (formerly of Microsoft) has one of Babbage’s difference engines.

  • http://DermatologyTuscaloosa Tuscaloosa Dermatology

    There were a king with a large jaw and a queen with a plain face, on the throne of England; there were a king with a large jaw and a queen with a fair face, on the throne of France. In both countries it was clearer than crystal to the lords of the State preserves of loaves and fishes, that things in general were settled for ever.

  • Wes Nelson

    “And who needs a computer than calculates false numbers?”

    Let me think on that for a moment…. maybe a government? But wait, it wouldn’t need a ‘puter to do that, would it?





    • About the Blog

      Discoblog is DISCOVER's compendium of quirky, funny, and surprising science news from the edge of the known universe. It's written by Veronique Greenwood and Valerie Ross. Email tips and suggestions to vgreenwood [at] discovermagazine [dot] com.

      Discoblog also includes the daily feature NCBI ROFL, in which two prone-to-distraction grad students post real scientific articles with funny subjects. Email your tips to ncbirofl [at] gmail.com. Follow the ROFL feed here.

    • Twitter

      Follow @discovermag
    • Facebook

    • Twidget

      Add Tweets
    • Archives

      Archives

      • May 2012
      • April 2012
      • March 2012
      • February 2012
      • January 2012
      • December 2011
      • November 2011
      • October 2011
      • September 2011
      • August 2011
      • July 2011
      • June 2011
      • May 2011
      • April 2011
      • March 2011
      • February 2011
      • January 2011
      • December 2010
      • November 2010
      • October 2010
      • September 2010
      • August 2010
      • July 2010
      • June 2010
      • May 2010
      • April 2010
      • March 2010
      • February 2010
      • January 2010
      • December 2009
      • November 2009
      • October 2009
      • September 2009
      • August 2009
      • July 2009
      • June 2009
      • May 2009
      • April 2009
      • March 2009
      • February 2009
      • January 2009
      • December 2008
      • November 2008
      • October 2008
      • September 2008
      • August 2008
      • July 2008
      • June 2008
      • May 2008
      • April 2008
      • March 2008
      • February 2008
      • January 2008
      • December 2007
      • November 2007
      • October 2007
      • September 2007
      • August 2007
      • July 2007
      • June 2007
      • May 2007
      • April 2007
      • February 2007
      • January 2007
      • December 2006
      • November 2006
      • October 2006
      • September 2006


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us