Maggot debridement therapy: free-range or contained? An in-vivo study.
“OBJECTIVE: To determine which method of maggot debridement therapy–free-range or contained–is more effective for wound healing. METHODS: In vivo study of 64 patients with 69 chronic wounds that showed signs of gangrenous or necrotic tissue. Patients were treated with either free-range or contained maggot debridement therapy according to maggot availability, dressing difficulty, and physician preference. RESULTS: Significantly better outcomes were achieved with the free-range technique versus the contained technique (P = .028). With the free-range technique, the mean number of maggot applications and the total number of maggots per treatment were significantly lower than with the contained application technique (P = .028 and P < .001, respectively). CONCLUSION: This clinical in vivo study supports in vitro studies in which containment of maggots was found to reduce the effectiveness of maggot debridement therapy.”
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Self-surgery: not for the faint of heart.
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Hijacking a plane flown by euthanized pigs: a beginner’s manual.
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: The mystery of the bottle cap in the knee.
WTF is NCBI ROFL? Read our FAQ!