<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sinned Lately? There&#8217;s a Vatican-Approved App for That</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/discoblog/2011/02/08/sinned-lately-theres-a-vatican-approved-app-for-that/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/discoblog/2011/02/08/sinned-lately-theres-a-vatican-approved-app-for-that/</link>
	<description>Quirky, funny, and surprising science news from the edge of the known universe.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 18:28:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/discoblog/2011/02/08/sinned-lately-theres-a-vatican-approved-app-for-that/comment-page-1/#comment-69352</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 03:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/discoblog/?p=16134#comment-69352</guid>
		<description>I actually found this app to be awesome. I&#039;ve been using it for a few days. It&#039;s called the Jesus Alarm: http://www.jesusalarm.com 

I&#039;m also wondering if people have other apps they&#039;d recommend. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually found this app to be awesome. I&#8217;ve been using it for a few days. It&#8217;s called the Jesus Alarm: <a href="http://www.jesusalarm.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.jesusalarm.com</a> </p>
<p>I&#8217;m also wondering if people have other apps they&#8217;d recommend. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eliza Strickland</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/discoblog/2011/02/08/sinned-lately-theres-a-vatican-approved-app-for-that/comment-page-1/#comment-63368</link>
		<dc:creator>Eliza Strickland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 18:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/discoblog/?p=16134#comment-63368</guid>
		<description>@ roughmixer1: Don&#039;t worry, your email address is never visible to others. But I deleted it from the back end to reassure you.

-- Eliza, DISCOVER online news editor</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ roughmixer1: Don&#8217;t worry, your email address is never visible to others. But I deleted it from the back end to reassure you.</p>
<p>&#8211; Eliza, DISCOVER online news editor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roughmixer1</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/discoblog/2011/02/08/sinned-lately-theres-a-vatican-approved-app-for-that/comment-page-1/#comment-63357</link>
		<dc:creator>roughmixer1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Feb 2011 18:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/discoblog/?p=16134#comment-63357</guid>
		<description>And you said the email adress would NOT be published an there is it as cleaa as day!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And you said the email adress would NOT be published an there is it as cleaa as day!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roughmixer1</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/discoblog/2011/02/08/sinned-lately-theres-a-vatican-approved-app-for-that/comment-page-1/#comment-63329</link>
		<dc:creator>roughmixer1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 19:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/discoblog/?p=16134#comment-63329</guid>
		<description>Not a joke Peg, nor a 500 year old prejudice. It is based on today and probably on things you may be too blind to know about! Like the punished &quot;whistleblowers&quot;. Only attempts to survive day 1 Catholicism and seriously ask, &quot;What is next?&quot; Based on history: Inquisition, Reformation, bought and paid for Indulgences, Luther, Joan, Galileo, killing Jews, etc., etc. all in the name of God and the &quot;true&quot; Church. According to you and Donahue (Hey, that rhymes), we&#039;re supposed to put all that aside and blindly obey and believe our lying bishops? 

But their lies that it is a &quot;true&quot; church and all good are true and you can be content with your learned and forced guilt and pay your $1.99. Ah yes, long live the old memorized Baltimore Catechism. Erroneous? Perhaps, but it still lives in a lot of us. 

You and others can blindly defend and &quot;obey&quot; and say &quot;jokes&quot;. But the &quot;true&quot; Church where we are &quot;forced&quot; to believe, has lied and withheld and continues to pay to cover up the scandals too much for us to blindly accept most anything or defenses, or even silence, or &quot;you must or else&quot;  that come from the Vatican, or you, or Donahue, or elsewhere these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not a joke Peg, nor a 500 year old prejudice. It is based on today and probably on things you may be too blind to know about! Like the punished &#8220;whistleblowers&#8221;. Only attempts to survive day 1 Catholicism and seriously ask, &#8220;What is next?&#8221; Based on history: Inquisition, Reformation, bought and paid for Indulgences, Luther, Joan, Galileo, killing Jews, etc., etc. all in the name of God and the &#8220;true&#8221; Church. According to you and Donahue (Hey, that rhymes), we&#8217;re supposed to put all that aside and blindly obey and believe our lying bishops? </p>
<p>But their lies that it is a &#8220;true&#8221; church and all good are true and you can be content with your learned and forced guilt and pay your $1.99. Ah yes, long live the old memorized Baltimore Catechism. Erroneous? Perhaps, but it still lives in a lot of us. </p>
<p>You and others can blindly defend and &#8220;obey&#8221; and say &#8220;jokes&#8221;. But the &#8220;true&#8221; Church where we are &#8220;forced&#8221; to believe, has lied and withheld and continues to pay to cover up the scandals too much for us to blindly accept most anything or defenses, or even silence, or &#8220;you must or else&#8221;  that come from the Vatican, or you, or Donahue, or elsewhere these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peg</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/discoblog/2011/02/08/sinned-lately-theres-a-vatican-approved-app-for-that/comment-page-1/#comment-63326</link>
		<dc:creator>Peg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 02:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/discoblog/?p=16134#comment-63326</guid>
		<description>Oh for pity&#039;s sake, roughmixer1.  Get over your 500 year old prejudice, already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh for pity&#8217;s sake, roughmixer1.  Get over your 500 year old prejudice, already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T.Nortem</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/discoblog/2011/02/08/sinned-lately-theres-a-vatican-approved-app-for-that/comment-page-1/#comment-63324</link>
		<dc:creator>T.Nortem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 02:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/discoblog/?p=16134#comment-63324</guid>
		<description>Thank you for covering the news of this Catholic dip into iPhone technology, but I have to admit that the  style and tone of this piece is not only irreverent, but downright insulting to every science-reading Catholic out there. Here are a few examples:

1.) &quot;people chiseled the word of god on stone tablets&quot; The article starts off assuming that the reader is an atheist, that s/he doesn&#039;t believe in God--that is, that the Ten Commandments weren&#039;t handed to humanity by God, but merely chiseled by humans. This view is further entrenched by not giving a respectful capitalization to words like &quot;God&quot; or &quot;Ten Commandments.&quot;

2.) &quot;enabled things like religious flyers, handed out to innocent bypasser[s]&quot; The realm of religious flyers on street corners is usually frequented by fundamentalists, not Roman Catholics, but that&#039;s not my main concern here--my main concern is your implicit message that these &#039;flyer people&#039; are doing something wrong by handing out flyers, by subjecting these &quot;innocent byspasser[s]&quot; to their views. I don&#039;t appreciate these flyers much myself, but that doesn&#039;t mean these people don&#039;t have a right to profess their faith in God. To imply that what their doing is morally wrong is itself wrong. (I.e. By setting up the bypassers as innocent, you&#039;re implying that the &#039;flyer people&#039; are somehow committing a crime against these &#039;innocent&#039; people; it&#039;s a rhetorical structure.)

Other news outlets have reported these same findings, but they&#039;ve done it in a clear, non-biased manner: (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-12391129 or http://www.nydailynews.com/tech_guide/2011/02/07/2011-02-07_forgive_me_iphone_new_app_okayed_by_catholic_church.html)

I&#039;m not asking for DISCOVER to endorse Catholocism or any religion--I&#039;m just asking that it write its news in an un-biased manner...something this article is not. Sadly, this article emphasizes the worn out, wrong view that belief in God and knowledge of science are mutually exclusive. As a newly-minted college physics professor and a practicing Catholic, I can attest that they are not. Bottom line: please show some respect to those who love science and believe in God.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for covering the news of this Catholic dip into iPhone technology, but I have to admit that the  style and tone of this piece is not only irreverent, but downright insulting to every science-reading Catholic out there. Here are a few examples:</p>
<p>1.) &#8220;people chiseled the word of god on stone tablets&#8221; The article starts off assuming that the reader is an atheist, that s/he doesn&#8217;t believe in God&#8211;that is, that the Ten Commandments weren&#8217;t handed to humanity by God, but merely chiseled by humans. This view is further entrenched by not giving a respectful capitalization to words like &#8220;God&#8221; or &#8220;Ten Commandments.&#8221;</p>
<p>2.) &#8220;enabled things like religious flyers, handed out to innocent bypasser[s]&#8221; The realm of religious flyers on street corners is usually frequented by fundamentalists, not Roman Catholics, but that&#8217;s not my main concern here&#8211;my main concern is your implicit message that these &#8216;flyer people&#8217; are doing something wrong by handing out flyers, by subjecting these &#8220;innocent byspasser[s]&#8221; to their views. I don&#8217;t appreciate these flyers much myself, but that doesn&#8217;t mean these people don&#8217;t have a right to profess their faith in God. To imply that what their doing is morally wrong is itself wrong. (I.e. By setting up the bypassers as innocent, you&#8217;re implying that the &#8216;flyer people&#8217; are somehow committing a crime against these &#8216;innocent&#8217; people; it&#8217;s a rhetorical structure.)</p>
<p>Other news outlets have reported these same findings, but they&#8217;ve done it in a clear, non-biased manner: (<a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-12391129" rel="nofollow">http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-12391129</a> or <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/tech_guide/2011/02/07/2011-02-07_forgive_me_iphone_new_app_okayed_by_catholic_church.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nydailynews.com/tech_guide/2011/02/07/2011-02-07_forgive_me_iphone_new_app_okayed_by_catholic_church.html</a>)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not asking for DISCOVER to endorse Catholocism or any religion&#8211;I&#8217;m just asking that it write its news in an un-biased manner&#8230;something this article is not. Sadly, this article emphasizes the worn out, wrong view that belief in God and knowledge of science are mutually exclusive. As a newly-minted college physics professor and a practicing Catholic, I can attest that they are not. Bottom line: please show some respect to those who love science and believe in God.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roughmixer1</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/discoblog/2011/02/08/sinned-lately-theres-a-vatican-approved-app-for-that/comment-page-1/#comment-63319</link>
		<dc:creator>roughmixer1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 15:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/discoblog/?p=16134#comment-63319</guid>
		<description>So, why don&#039;t they now line up a bunch of anonymous priests at South Bend to &quot;hear&quot; and hand out absolution for another $1.99 and save everyone time, gas and unnecesary guilt? How about another $1.99 for some kind of glorious Indulgence like in the old days? Or maybe a two for one at $3.99?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, why don&#8217;t they now line up a bunch of anonymous priests at South Bend to &#8220;hear&#8221; and hand out absolution for another $1.99 and save everyone time, gas and unnecesary guilt? How about another $1.99 for some kind of glorious Indulgence like in the old days? Or maybe a two for one at $3.99?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-05-25 20:55:36 -->
