DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Discoblog
« Success! Doctors Solve First Known Case Of Popeye Butt
No, YouTube’s Fake-Boob-Biting Snake Didn’t Die of Silicone Poisoning »

NCBI ROFL: Why women like men in red cars.

Red, rank, and romance in women viewing men.

“In many nonhuman species of vertebrates, females are attracted to red on male conspecifics. Red is also a signal of male status in many nonhuman vertebrate species, and females show a mating preference for high-status males. These red-attraction and red-status links have been found even when red is displayed on males artificially. In the present research, we document parallels between human and nonhuman females’ response to male red. Specifically, in a series of 7 experiments we demonstrate that women perceive men to be more attractive and sexually desirable when seen on a red background and in red clothing, and we additionally show that status perceptions are responsible for this red effect. The influence of red appears to be specific to women’s romantic attraction to men: Red did not influence men’s perceptions of other men, nor did it influence women’s perceptions of men’s overall likability, agreeableness, or extraversion. Participants showed no awareness that the research focused on the influence of color. These findings indicate that color not only has aesthetic value but can carry meaning and impact psychological functioning in subtle, important, and provocative ways.”


Photo: flickr/jonmasters

Related content:
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Doctors on display: the evolution of television’s doctors.
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Managing the blue man.
Discoblog:  NCBI ROFL: Blue is for losers.

WTF is NCBI ROFL? Read our FAQ!

Share

March 15th, 2011 7:00 PM by ncbi rofl in holy correlation batman!, NCBI ROFL, ridiculous titles | 4 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

  • Idlewilde

    Most red carred (or bright carred) men in my expierience don’t signal and pull too far into the walklane. Today, a kid in a shiny red suv, younger than me, turned at the walk light and drove past me, with a wolf whistle. His car was maybe 2-3 feet away; I could have touched it. I know I probably should have reported him, but I was too surprised to notice the licence plate. As far as I can tell, the brighter the car, the sorer the need for an attitude adjustment.

    ^sorry for rant…

  • http://www.google.com/profiles/smwilson31 Sam

    Could social implications be a factor? Red lipstick has been deemed sexually desirable for a long time and the iconic red love heart insinuates love. Was this study carried out with other bright colours such as blue or green and what age were the participants?

    Sam

  • Neon Sequitur

    I can’t drive a red car; it won’t match *anything* in my wardrobe!

  • Matt B.

    I’d like to see if there’s a corresponding color for women’s status. It might help them at work if they painted the back wall of their offices that color. (Going for status here, not mating.) And I’m pretty sure pink isn’t it.





    • About the Blog

      Discoblog is DISCOVER's compendium of quirky, funny, and surprising science news from the edge of the known universe. It's written by Veronique Greenwood and Valerie Ross. Email tips and suggestions to vgreenwood [at] discovermagazine [dot] com.

      Discoblog also includes the daily feature NCBI ROFL, in which two prone-to-distraction grad students post real scientific articles with funny subjects. Email your tips to ncbirofl [at] gmail.com. Follow the ROFL feed here.

    • Twitter

      Follow @discovermag
    • Facebook

    • Twidget

      Add Tweets
    • Archives

      Archives

      • May 2012
      • April 2012
      • March 2012
      • February 2012
      • January 2012
      • December 2011
      • November 2011
      • October 2011
      • September 2011
      • August 2011
      • July 2011
      • June 2011
      • May 2011
      • April 2011
      • March 2011
      • February 2011
      • January 2011
      • December 2010
      • November 2010
      • October 2010
      • September 2010
      • August 2010
      • July 2010
      • June 2010
      • May 2010
      • April 2010
      • March 2010
      • February 2010
      • January 2010
      • December 2009
      • November 2009
      • October 2009
      • September 2009
      • August 2009
      • July 2009
      • June 2009
      • May 2009
      • April 2009
      • March 2009
      • February 2009
      • January 2009
      • December 2008
      • November 2008
      • October 2008
      • September 2008
      • August 2008
      • July 2008
      • June 2008
      • May 2008
      • April 2008
      • March 2008
      • February 2008
      • January 2008
      • December 2007
      • November 2007
      • October 2007
      • September 2007
      • August 2007
      • July 2007
      • June 2007
      • May 2007
      • April 2007
      • February 2007
      • January 2007
      • December 2006
      • November 2006
      • October 2006
      • September 2006


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us