DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Discoblog
« No More ‘Jersey Shore’: New TV Tells Advertisers, Retailers, and Everybody Else What You’re Watching
NCBI ROFL: Unhappy yearbook photos herald crappier lives. »

NCBI ROFL: What did God do with Adam’s penis bone?

Congenital human baculum deficiency: the generative bone of Genesis 2:21-23.

“Another genetic condition, extending to 100% of human males, is the congenital lack of a baculum. Whereas most mammals (including common species such as dogs and mice) and most other primates (excepting spider monkeys) have a penile bone, human males lack this bone and must rely on fluid hydraulics to maintain erections. This is not an insignificant bone. The baculum of a large dog can be 10 cm long x 1.3 cm wide x 1 cm thick… Human bacula have been reported, usually in association with other congenital diseases or penile abnormalities.

One of the creation stories in Genesis may be an explanatory myth wherein the Bible attempts to find a cause for why human males lack this particular bone. Our opinion is that Adam did not lose a rib in the creation of Eve. Any ancient Israelite (or for that matter, any American child) would be expected to know that there is an equal (and even) number of ribs in both men and women. Moreover, ribs lack any intrinsic generative capacity. We think it is far more probable that it was Adam’s baculum that was removed in order to make Eve. That would explain why human males, of all the primates and most other mammals, did not have one. The Hebrew noun translated as “rib,” tzela (tzade, lamed, ayin), can indeed mean a costal rib. It can also mean the rib of a hill (2 Samuel 16:13), the side chambers (enclosing the temple like ribs, as in 1 Kings 6:5,6), or the supporting columns of trees, like cedars or firs, or the planks in buildings and doors (1 Kings 6:15,16). So the word could be used to indicate a structural support beam. Interestingly, Biblical Hebrew, unlike later rabbinic Hebrew, had no technical term for the penis and referred to it through many circumlocutions. When rendered into Greek, sometime in the second century BCE, the translators used the word pleura, which means “side,” and would connote a body rib (as the medical term pleura still does). This translation, enshrined in the Septuagint, the Greek Bible of the early church, fixed the meaning for most of western civilization, even though the Hebrew was not so specific.

In addition, Genesis 2:21 contains another etiological detail: “The Lord God closed up the flesh.” This detail would explain the peculiar visible sign on the penis and scrotum of human males—the raphé . In the human penis and scrotum, the edges of the urogenital folds come together over the urogenital sinus (urethral groove) to form a seam, the raphé. If this seam does not form, hypospadias of the glans, penis, and scrotum can result. The origin of this seam on the external genitalia was “explained” by the story of the closing of Adam’s flesh. Again, the wound associated with the generation of Eve is connected to Adam’s penis and not his rib.

A rib has no particular potency nor is it associated mythologically or symbolically with any human generative act. Needless to say, the penis has always been associated with generation, in practice, in mythology, and in the popular imagination. Therefore, the literal, metaphorical, and euphemistic use of the word tzela make the baculum a good candidate for the singular bone taken from Adam to generate Eve.”

Image: flickr/ oddsock

Related content:
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: References to the paraphilias and sexual crimes in the Bible.
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Whale ménage à trois: now with 1,000-kg testes!
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: The circumcision of Jesus Christ.

Share

August 19th, 2011 7:00 PM by ncbi rofl in analysis taken too far, holy correlation, NCBI ROFL, penis friday | 18 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

  • http://jinchi.blogspot.com Jinchi

    any American child would be expected to know that there is an equal (and even) number of ribs in both men and women.

    You’d think so. But I remember an argument years ago between my sister and her boyfriend. She thought it was absurd to take the Bible literally. His response, “Then why do men have one less rib than women?”, floored me for it’s idiocy.

    Google shows us that he wasn’t alone.

    http://www.google.com/search?q=do+men+have+more+rib+than+women

    That gets 2,350,000 results

  • TRJ

    If I loose an arm in an accident, and later have a child, he/she will still be born with two arms. The same with Adam and his children. If he was a real person, the removing of a bone from him to make Eve, would have been a physical change effecting only him, and not his progeny. He would live the rest of his life missing that bone, but all his chidren would be born with it. After all, when God wrestled with Jacob, God touched Jacob’s leg and made him lame. But Jacob is the father of the Jewish people, and all Jews today are not born lame. Just as Jacob was made lame, but not his descendents, Adam would have lost a bone, but not his descendents.

  • http://www.cicatrices.com.mx Felix Rocha

    Read in my website http://www.cicatrices.com.mx in my response to Richard Dawkins in three parts a full description of the origin of the male human raphe.
    Felix Rocha
    frocham@yahoo.com

  • QHC

    It is not a case for Lamarckian inheritance. It’s a reevaluation of a religious story.

  • http://backreaction.blogspot.com/ Bee

    Why did Adam have a penis bone if there was no Eva in the first place?

  • colluvial

    Regardless of what the authors of the Bible might have imagined was the source of Eve, why use this particular literary device? Is there some significance to the idea that women were created from a defunct piece of male anatomy?

  • Brian

    TRJ – It was a metaphoric explanation vs. a literal explanation of the physical traits observed. The constellation Orion isn’t actually a hunter, similarly, the “explanations” in scripture are ancient musings in “how we got here and what is man?” Genetics? Seriously? Why the bible, unlike any other oral or written ancient collection of wisdom, stories, or otherwise, must be absolute and literal to maintain any relevance, value, or meaning is amazing to me. The beauty of scripture is the mystery and metaphor.

  • http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/949 NB

    This is cute. I think their theory does explain the mythology, but it’s still an interesting question: why human males have no penis bone? After all, so many wish they did ;-)

  • Jockaira

    “Biblical Hebrew, unlike later rabbinic Hebrew, had no technical term for the penis and referred to it through many circumlocutions.”

    Undoubtedly, this puts the penis into the same category as “G-d”, another concept for which the ancient Jews had no exact linguistic reference or label. Could this be a tacit acknowledgment that the ancient Jews were penis worshippers and equated the penis with their god, or maybe that God is really a dick?

    If you don’t want questions like this, then you shouldn’t be asking “What did God do with Adam’s penis bone?”

    To paraphrase an early 20th Century poet on the subject of baculae: “Adam Had ‘em”

  • Sequoia Edwards

    @ colluvial: I have long thought that women do not really have penis envy but that men may well envy women for being able to give birth and that it is the foundation of this story. I also think that there is evidence that the origin of blood sacrifice may be rooted in men’s attempts to possess what they thought of as women’s “blood power.”

  • http://johannesbertusdevilliers.co.za Bertus!

    This is a device frequently employed in the Hebrew Bible. For instance: reference the passage where Ruth climbed into Boas’s bed and curled up by his feet – obviously feet there is a reference to the same thing. And passages in Ezechiel (if memory serves me correctly) where the angels are said to cover their “feet” with their wings for modesty’s sake.

  • Marga

    I heard this /exact theory/ from anthropologist Vincent Sarich when he was teaching at Berkeley in the late 1980′s. It seems to me that you probably borrowed it from him.

  • http://malct32@blogspot.com Malc

    TRJ: Adam was halfway swallowing the forbidden fruit when god spoke, and so the thing stuck in his throat. So now all males have this thing called “Adam’s Apple”.

    So, supposedly the bible is correct, all males should be lacking a rib bone.

  • Me

    How about everyone take a breath for a moment? Stop trying. Maybe start listening.

  • localgirl

    Well that certainly makes more sense than a rib. And it’s quite a beautiful way to look at it. When man and woman join, He is reconnecting in the closest possible way to the thing he sacrificed.

  • peter Veitch

    Great story, gives new meaning to “argumentum ad baculum” . Still , seriously who apart from indoctrinated fundamentalist crazies take the Adam and eve myth as fact?

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_OIETDA6TEJLP4DESVGEZTOIULU Mike The Tiger

     Google? You use Google as a reference point?  That floors me!

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_OIETDA6TEJLP4DESVGEZTOIULU Mike The Tiger

     TRJ, Great answer!  Just because some people make stupid statements doesn’t make the Bible any less accurate.  The Bible does not say that men have one less rib because of God’s use of Adam’s rib bone to create Eve.





    • About the Blog

      Discoblog is DISCOVER's compendium of quirky, funny, and surprising science news from the edge of the known universe. It's written by Veronique Greenwood and Valerie Ross. Email tips and suggestions to vgreenwood [at] discovermagazine [dot] com.

      Discoblog also includes the daily feature NCBI ROFL, in which two prone-to-distraction grad students post real scientific articles with funny subjects. Email your tips to ncbirofl [at] gmail.com. Follow the ROFL feed here.

    • Twitter

      Follow @discovermag
    • Facebook

    • Twidget

      Add Tweets
    • Archives

      Archives

      • May 2012
      • April 2012
      • March 2012
      • February 2012
      • January 2012
      • December 2011
      • November 2011
      • October 2011
      • September 2011
      • August 2011
      • July 2011
      • June 2011
      • May 2011
      • April 2011
      • March 2011
      • February 2011
      • January 2011
      • December 2010
      • November 2010
      • October 2010
      • September 2010
      • August 2010
      • July 2010
      • June 2010
      • May 2010
      • April 2010
      • March 2010
      • February 2010
      • January 2010
      • December 2009
      • November 2009
      • October 2009
      • September 2009
      • August 2009
      • July 2009
      • June 2009
      • May 2009
      • April 2009
      • March 2009
      • February 2009
      • January 2009
      • December 2008
      • November 2008
      • October 2008
      • September 2008
      • August 2008
      • July 2008
      • June 2008
      • May 2008
      • April 2008
      • March 2008
      • February 2008
      • January 2008
      • December 2007
      • November 2007
      • October 2007
      • September 2007
      • August 2007
      • July 2007
      • June 2007
      • May 2007
      • April 2007
      • February 2007
      • January 2007
      • December 2006
      • November 2006
      • October 2006
      • September 2006


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us