“The hypothesis that sexual attitudes, as measured by the Sexual Opinion Survey, are related to the explicitness with which nude figures are drawn was examined. The presence or absence of various sexual and nonsexual anatomical features, as well as length and width measurements, were assessed in the drawing of nudes by 17 male and 23 female undergraduates. Individuals with relatively positive sexual attitudes (erotophiles), as compared with individuals with relatively negative attitudes (erotophobes), were more likely to include such details as a glans, a urinary meatus, and chest hair on male figures and pubic hair and nipples on female figures. Positive sexual attitudes were also associated with drawing figures with longer and wider penises, breasts, testicles, and mons. Relationships between sexual attitudes and the drawing of nonsexual body parts were generally not significant. The results are discussed in terms of the pervasive generality of sexual attitudes in influencing quite varied sex-related behaviors.”
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Effects of menstrual cycle phase on ratings of implicitly erotic art.
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: When it comes to penis length and economic growth, size does matter.
Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Viva viva? Women’s meanings associated with male nudity in a 1970s “for women” magazine.
WTF is NCBI ROFL? Read our FAQ!