http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/discoblog/2012/02/23/ncbi-rofl-and-the-february-no-sht-sherlock-award-goes-to/ Sat, 11 May 2013 22:50:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2 http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/discoblog/2012/02/23/ncbi-rofl-and-the-february-no-sht-sherlock-award-goes-to/#comment-26076 wade elmblad Fri, 24 Feb 2012 19:49:00 +0000 http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/discoblog/?p=21073#comment-26076 test test

]]> http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/discoblog/2012/02/23/ncbi-rofl-and-the-february-no-sht-sherlock-award-goes-to/#comment-26075 Anonymous Fri, 24 Feb 2012 12:14:00 +0000 http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/discoblog/?p=21073#comment-26075 No Sh*t Sherlock means it is obvious! No Sh*t Sherlock means it is obvious!

]]> http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/discoblog/2012/02/23/ncbi-rofl-and-the-february-no-sht-sherlock-award-goes-to/#comment-26074 grad student Fri, 24 Feb 2012 04:28:00 +0000 http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/discoblog/?p=21073#comment-26074 I don't understand the "no sh*t sherlock" title. I think that is a legitimately interesting finding. Why is there a preference for male images among the gay, lesbian, bisexual community? That might imply that the people using those phone books are not 50% male/50% female. I was unaware that there was a trend among the genders in their use of phone books or that there's a higher rate of male images in gay community books. This was obvious to some people? I don’t understand the “no sh*t sherlock” title. I think that is a legitimately interesting finding. Why is there a preference for male images among the gay, lesbian, bisexual community? That might imply that the people using those phone books are not 50% male/50% female. I was unaware that there was a trend among the genders in their use of phone books or that there’s a higher rate of male images in gay community books. This was obvious to some people?

]]>