10 Questions with Charles Murray

By Razib Khan | July 24, 2006 9:00 am

Over at GNXP Classic our resident virgin Matt McIntosh poses 10 questions for Charles Murray, author of The Bell Curve.

CATEGORIZED UNDER: Blog
  • http://www.giveupblog.com quitter

    I hope it was a comment problem that killed my first try at this.
    The Bell Curve has been debunked again and again as a piece of scientific racism. The ties between the researchers and the Pioneer Fund alone should have been a sign. Not to mention Stephen Jay Gould’s critique in Mismeasure of Man and the statistical flaws identified in their regression analysis.
    Why would a conversation with this bigot be worth republishing again?

  • http://scienceblogs.com/gnxp razib

    i know him as a personal acquaintance. he’s not a bigot. if he is, so am i, and you should stop reading this weblog.

  • http://catallarchy.net/blog/ Matt McIntosh

    You have much work to do around these parts, it seems.
    And I’m not a virgin, I’m just in a lull! I’m also still cranky about being shot down a few days ago, so watch it or there’ll be blood running in the streets soon. D:

  • R. Boknekht

    The Bell Curve has been debunked again and again as a piece of scientific racism
    Too funny.

  • http://www.giveupblog.com quitter

    No worries there. Have fun with your Pioneer Fund buddy.

  • rikurzhen

    According to critic Ulric Neisser, who was the chairman of the APA’s 1995 taskforce on intelligence research, the Pioneer fund’s contribution has overall been “a weak plus”.
    Neisser gave support for Richard Lynn’s argument in a review of Lynn’s history and defense of the fund, The Science of Human Diversity: A History of the Pioneer Fund (2004). Though race and intelligence research “turns [his] stomach,” Neisser stated that “Lynn’s claim is exaggerated but not entirely without merit: ‘Over those 60 years, the research funded by Pioneer has helped change the face of social science.'” Neisser concludes, in agreement with Lynn and against William Tucker’s critical 2002 book The Funding of Scientific Racism, that the world was ultimately better off having had the Pioneer Fund: “Lynn reminds us that Pioneer has sometimes sponsored useful research – research that otherwise might not have been done at all. By that reckoning, I would give it a weak plus.”

NEW ON DISCOVER
OPEN
CITIZEN SCIENCE
ADVERTISEMENT

Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!

Gene Expression

This blog is about evolution, genetics, genomics and their interstices. Please beware that comments are aggressively moderated. Uncivil or churlish comments will likely get you banned immediately, so make any contribution count!

About Razib Khan

I have degrees in biology and biochemistry, a passion for genetics, history, and philosophy, and shrimp is my favorite food. In relation to nationality I'm a American Northwesterner, in politics I'm a reactionary, and as for religion I have none (I'm an atheist). If you want to know more, see the links at http://www.razib.com

ADVERTISEMENT

See More

ADVERTISEMENT

RSS Razib’s Pinboard

Edifying books

Collapse bottom bar
+

Login to your Account

X
E-mail address:
Password:
Remember me
Forgot your password?
No problem. Click here to have it e-mailed to you.

Not Registered Yet?

Register now for FREE. Registration only takes a few minutes to complete. Register now »