The long fuse of mammalian diversity

By Razib Khan | March 28, 2007 4:50 pm

Study Re-evaluates Evolution of Mammals:

Until now, however, most paleontologists had favored a “short-fuse” model in which mammals came into their own almost immediately after the dominant reptiles vacated their habitats. Before the extinctions, most mammals were small nocturnal creatures.
The new study confirmed and elaborated on earlier research by molecular biologists indicating that many of today’s mammalian orders originated from 100 million to 85 million years ago. The reasons for this evolutionary burst are not clear.
Drawing on both molecular and fossil data, the researchers said they found that the “pivotal macroevolutionary events for those lineages with extant mammalian descendants” occurred well before the mass extinction and long after. They emphasized that the molecular and fossil evidence provide “different parts of this picture, attesting to the value of using both approaches together.”

I don’t know much about this, but this seems cool. I hadn’t known that the molecular biologists and paleontologists were arguing about the deep lineages inferred from the genetic data, and it seems like the outcome was similar to the 1970s where the molecular side was validated by new finds.

CATEGORIZED UNDER: Evolution
  • http://thedragonstales.blogspot.com Will Baird

    Interesting.
    I think that you will find that this was during the Cretaceous when the continents were rather fragmented[1]. I believe you gene-muckers can probably find a explanation from there. :)
    1. http://scotese.com/cretaceo.htm

  • Mike McKeown

    I just finished Dawkins’ “Ancestors’ Tale”. In writing that a couple of years ago he already stressed, from molecular evidence, that the major divisions in mammals were genetically established in the range discussed in the paper. He did suggest that most of the lineages probably were rather shrew-like.

  • http://www.scienceblogs.com/gnxp razib

    mike, i recall that. that is why i was surprised that the deep lineages weren’t accepted….

  • http://www.mythusmageopines.com/wp Alan Kellogg

    As I understand it, the sequence appears to be monotreme-marsupial-placental. This be the case, then monotremes would have to go back a lot further than we think; insofar as we’ve found placental fossils older than the oldest monotreme fossils. Indeed, the monotremes may actually be advanced triconodonts, making them the oldest mammalian line currently exant.

NEW ON DISCOVER
OPEN
CITIZEN SCIENCE
ADVERTISEMENT

Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!

Gene Expression

This blog is about evolution, genetics, genomics and their interstices. Please beware that comments are aggressively moderated. Uncivil or churlish comments will likely get you banned immediately, so make any contribution count!

About Razib Khan

I have degrees in biology and biochemistry, a passion for genetics, history, and philosophy, and shrimp is my favorite food. In relation to nationality I'm a American Northwesterner, in politics I'm a reactionary, and as for religion I have none (I'm an atheist). If you want to know more, see the links at http://www.razib.com

ADVERTISEMENT

See More

ADVERTISEMENT

RSS Razib’s Pinboard

Edifying books

Collapse bottom bar
+

Login to your Account

X
E-mail address:
Password:
Remember me
Forgot your password?
No problem. Click here to have it e-mailed to you.

Not Registered Yet?

Register now for FREE. Registration only takes a few minutes to complete. Register now »