Which Americans do and don't accept evolution?

By Razib Khan | January 26, 2008 3:31 am

Over at Half Sigma there’s some really interesting crunching of the GSS data. Some of it was not surprising to me, you see the same results in national polls on the topic; blacks are more Creationist than whites, who are more Creationist than Asians. Women are more Creationist than men, as are the poor vs. the rich and the uneducated vs. the more well educated. Then there are the obvious ones; evangelicals are more Creationist than mainline Protestants & Roman Catholics, who are more Creationist than those with no religion. You can find these data pretty easily with 30 seconds of googling, but Half Sigma’s regional results were pretty new to me, though I was not surprised by rank order.

Question: Human beings, as we know them today, developed from earlier species of animals. (Is that true or false?)
Region True False
New England 78.1 21.9
Middle Atlantic 60.3 39.7
East North Central 48.3 51.7
West North Central 50.9 49.1
South Atlantic 39.2 60.8
East South Central 32.1 67.9
West South Central 39.2 60.8
Mountain 59.8 40.2
Pacific 61.7 38.3

The Ns for some regions aren’t large, check out Half Sigma’s post for the full data. But I suspect this trend is robust and it pretty much matches our priors. It seems to reinforce the perception by many that the South is different, and that much of the exceptionalism of American culture can be attributed to this region and its large demographic and social footprint. In contrast, the data from New England bespeaks a culture with sensibilities not unlike much of Europe or Canada.

CATEGORIZED UNDER: Uncategorized
  • Scott Belyea

    I love it!
    “Is that true or false?”
    “Yes.”

  • Caledonian

    You’ve spoken about the regional differences in intellectual achievement and IQ before, speculating that they might be the result of a pathogen.
    How seriously have you considered the possibility that it’s a cultural pathogen to blame?

  • http://realevang.wordpress.com/ The Professor

    What’s even funnier is
    “Is that true or false?”
    “No.”

  • yo

    http://sda.berkeley.edu/cgi-bin32/hsda?harcsda+gss06
    “scitest4″ was the earlier version of that question
    in 2006 it’s “evolved”
    the other variables of interest:
    racecomb
    religion
    degree
    god
    region
    partyid
    or the other science knowledge questions:
    HOTCORE SCI KNOWLEDGE: THE CENTER OF EARTH IS VERY HOT
    RADIOACT SCI KNOWLEDGE:ALL RADIOACTIVITY IS MAN-MADE
    BOYORGRL SCI KNOWLEDGE:FATHER GENE DECIDES SEX OF BABY
    LASERS SCI KNOWLEDGE:LASERS WORK BY FOCUSING SOUND WAVES
    ELECTRON SCI KNOWLEDGE:ELECTRONS ARE SMALLER THAN ATOMS
    VIRUSES SCI KNOWLEDGE:ANTIVIOTICS KILL VIRUSES AS WELL AS BACTERIA
    BIGBANG SCI KNOWLEDGE:THE UNIVERSE BEGAN WITH A HUGE EXPLOSION
    CONDRIFT SCI KNOWLEDGE:THE CONTINENTS HAVE BEEN MOVING
    EVOLVED SCI KNOWLEDGE:HUMAN BEINGS DEVELOPED FROM ANIMALS
    EARTHSUN SCI KNOWLEDGE:THE EARTH GOES AROUND THE SUN
    SOLARREV SCI KNOWLEDGE:HOW LONG THE EARTH GOES AROUND THE SUN

  • Forrest

    Sneer at the South all you like, they still have better food, music, and literature that the rest of the country combined.

  • http://www.scienceblogs.com/gnxp razib

    Sneer at the South all you like, they still have better food, music, and literature that the rest of the country combined.
    the sushi in houston is good. cajun food too. i guess the rest of the food depends on how much you like stuff fried. as for music, well, that’s pretty subjective, but granted most great american music does have southern origins. but literature? faulkner is good, but walt whitman, nathaniel hawthorne, et. al. are nothing to sniff at in my book. seems like new england has definitely punched above its weight.

  • http://www.pobox.com/~rknop/blog/ Rob Knop

    Re: the best music of the South, it comes not just from the South, but from the black community in the South. (I’m thinking Jazz here, specifically.) The roots of that go back to the 19th century.
    Re: the south being “different” when it comes to evolution vs. creationism, bear in mind that according to this data, 40% of us in the South have our heads screwed on right and don’t feel the need to deny modern science…. and that nearly the same fraction of people elsewhere have their heads screwed on wrong and think that evolution is false. It’s not a huge dichotomy, it’s a matter of weighting. Yeah, there is a significant (i.e. measurable) difference, but it’s not “all smart there, all dumb here” by any means.

  • http://blog.chrislong.biz CL

    I find the anomalous and punctuated data for New England interesting, even more so because New England was in fact the birthplace of core American reason and rationalism.

NEW ON DISCOVER
OPEN
CITIZEN SCIENCE
ADVERTISEMENT

Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!

Gene Expression

This blog is about evolution, genetics, genomics and their interstices. Please beware that comments are aggressively moderated. Uncivil or churlish comments will likely get you banned immediately, so make any contribution count!

About Razib Khan

I have degrees in biology and biochemistry, a passion for genetics, history, and philosophy, and shrimp is my favorite food. In relation to nationality I'm a American Northwesterner, in politics I'm a reactionary, and as for religion I have none (I'm an atheist). If you want to know more, see the links at http://www.razib.com

ADVERTISEMENT

See More

ADVERTISEMENT

RSS Razib’s Pinboard

Edifying books

Collapse bottom bar
+

Login to your Account

X
E-mail address:
Password:
Remember me
Forgot your password?
No problem. Click here to have it e-mailed to you.

Not Registered Yet?

Register now for FREE. Registration only takes a few minutes to complete. Register now »