<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The dog as rat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2009/08/the-dog-as-rat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2009/08/the-dog-as-rat/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 22:42:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: zyxwvutsr</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2009/08/the-dog-as-rat/#comment-17312</link>
		<dc:creator>zyxwvutsr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 02:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2009/08/25/the-dog-as-rat/#comment-17312</guid>
		<description>&quot;Artificial&quot; selection? The very term is ripe for replacement. Maybe &quot;natural selection&quot; is, too. &quot;Selection&quot; and &quot;human selection&quot; would be okay, no? (The later being a subset of the former. Humans being part of the environment, etc., etc.)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Artificial&#8221; selection? The very term is ripe for replacement. Maybe &#8220;natural selection&#8221; is, too. &#8220;Selection&#8221; and &#8220;human selection&#8221; would be okay, no? (The later being a subset of the former. Humans being part of the environment, etc., etc.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
