<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Amerindians of Brazil more numerous than you think</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2010/06/amerindians-of-brazil-more-numerous-than-you-think/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2010/06/amerindians-of-brazil-more-numerous-than-you-think/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 04:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Razib Khan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2010/06/amerindians-of-brazil-more-numerous-than-you-think/#comment-22661</link>
		<dc:creator>Razib Khan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 09:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=4602#comment-22661</guid>
		<description>yeah, i think about the same as puerto rico. at least the amerindian component. i think puerto ricans are a bit more black than white brazilians, but less black than brazilians as a whole.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, i think about the same as puerto rico. at least the amerindian component. i think puerto ricans are a bit more black than white brazilians, but less black than brazilians as a whole.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Sailer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2010/06/amerindians-of-brazil-more-numerous-than-you-think/#comment-22660</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Sailer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 09:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=4602#comment-22660</guid>
		<description>About the same as Puerto Rico, right? I call it the Jennifer Lopez Effect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About the same as Puerto Rico, right? I call it the Jennifer Lopez Effect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walter Sobchak</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2010/06/amerindians-of-brazil-more-numerous-than-you-think/#comment-22659</link>
		<dc:creator>Walter Sobchak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 19:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=4602#comment-22659</guid>
		<description>&quot;Additionally, while 700,000 Brazilians identify as Amerindian, 2.4 million Americans do (though I believe that a much larger proportion of American Native Americans are of mixed ancestry than Brazilian Aboriginals). &quot;

Casino Gambling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Additionally, while 700,000 Brazilians identify as Amerindian, 2.4 million Americans do (though I believe that a much larger proportion of American Native Americans are of mixed ancestry than Brazilian Aboriginals). &#8221;</p>
<p>Casino Gambling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Latif</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2010/06/amerindians-of-brazil-more-numerous-than-you-think/#comment-22658</link>
		<dc:creator>Zachary Latif</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 11:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=4602#comment-22658</guid>
		<description>Interesting post and certainly raises the valid question that after a couple of generations &quot;mixture&quot; just gets blended into the population.

Sort of leads the way for the high immigration Western societies; it may just be that in a couple of generations there will be evidence of mixture but ethnic cohesiveness won&#039;t disintegrate.

At any rate its always comforting to know when human populations didn&#039;t die out but in one way or another persisted in a new permutation.

It does raise the question whether &quot;aesthetic preferences&quot; had an effect on why some populations look differently to their &quot;genetic mix&quot; (Saudi Arabs with their ~30% Sub-Saharan African population and Jewish pops, which resemble their host population but are genetically interlinked).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post and certainly raises the valid question that after a couple of generations &#8220;mixture&#8221; just gets blended into the population.</p>
<p>Sort of leads the way for the high immigration Western societies; it may just be that in a couple of generations there will be evidence of mixture but ethnic cohesiveness won&#8217;t disintegrate.</p>
<p>At any rate its always comforting to know when human populations didn&#8217;t die out but in one way or another persisted in a new permutation.</p>
<p>It does raise the question whether &#8220;aesthetic preferences&#8221; had an effect on why some populations look differently to their &#8220;genetic mix&#8221; (Saudi Arabs with their ~30% Sub-Saharan African population and Jewish pops, which resemble their host population but are genetically interlinked).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
