with(allCount,
symbols(SocialNum,EconNum,circles=CombCount,inches=1/5,bg=”blue”,xlab=”Social Liberalism”,ylab=”Economic Liberalism”, main=TheAnswer)
)

Very nice job on them, by the way.

First a confession, at Razib’s invitation to do so (I seem to recollect such an invitation) I declined to answer all of the questions because I suspect that he has the technical ability to identify me by my IP address and some of the questions request that I expose more personal information than I’m willing to provide at the moment. My present policy preferences however I don’t consider to be too personal and they are pretty proudly populist by the definition provided above. Within the current american spectrum of stated preferences and beliefs I would likely be considered somewhat socially conservative (I think there are 1950s-esque beliefs about gender, race, sexual orientation, civil society and the like that are unreasonably dismissed) as well as fiscally liberal (I would like to see single-payer healthcare the law of the land and guaranteed food and housing available to everyone on more than a de facto basis [unlike section 8, footstamps and the like] ).

I would imagine that I’m also an outlier in being a long-time reader who lacks a standard-issue college degree. I do however have an advanced degree of a different sort that is (almost always) socially and (reasonably often) academically considered more or less the equivalent of a doctorate so my response in Razib’s polls over the years have likely jumped between the two poles of “some college” and “post-graduate degree”. Unfortunately in any reasonably short poll it’s somewhat difficult to call out all of the fine nuances that would appear were there separate questions for the religion of most of your grandparents vs. your religion (Jewish/Agnostic) or personal social preferences vs. what you believe would be most beneficial for most people (Liberal/Conservative).

Oh, and I’m likely within a rather small minority of commenters here who has taken calculus courses despite not being a college grad. I wish I could say I was a virgin too but, alas, the sirens hath overcome me with their feminine wiles and I must join the damned but happy who have known the sin of the serpent’s flesh.

Anyhow, I hope this thread isn’t sufficiently dry so as to preclude the promised ridicule and shunning Bring it on you Libertarian retards and Liberal ostriches! I’m kidding, I love ya all. Let a thousand flowers bloom and assume the “airplane” position (Maoist references, for the unfamiliar).

I’d like to know sex partner numbers as a function of highest level of math (prediction: more math, less sex), and math intensity of college major (prediction: more math less sex. Higher numbers for arts and humanities).

clear enough?

daniel, you’re such a fucking nerd

The fact that the latter is completely off the radar is itself an ideological bias and shows a wonderfully naive historical (in)sensibility.

How about seeing graphs for:
- muscularity against math skills
- muscularity against knowing a programming language
- muscularity against socioeconomic status
- muscularity against household income in relation to the national mean

(Feel free to say “no” of course )

The survey creator has elected to maintain privacy for the results of this survey. If you believe that this survey’s results should be openly shared, please refer the survey owner to the Help Center: How do I share the results of my survey?