<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Strange genetic variation in South Asia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2010/08/strange-genetic-variation-in-south-asia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2010/08/strange-genetic-variation-in-south-asia/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 22:42:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Razib Khan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2010/08/strange-genetic-variation-in-south-asia/#comment-23823</link>
		<dc:creator>Razib Khan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 01:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=5397#comment-23823</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Another possibility is Siddi admixture – after all Gujarat state is the main population center??&lt;/i&gt;

no. the makranis have african admixture, and it is obvious in them (they&#039;re more toward african than any other south asians). this doesn&#039;t show up on the plots with african populations. in fact, it doesn&#039;t show up with east asians either. i think it&#039;s something local to south asia, perhaps due to extreme inbreeding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Another possibility is Siddi admixture – after all Gujarat state is the main population center??</i></p>
<p>no. the makranis have african admixture, and it is obvious in them (they&#8217;re more toward african than any other south asians). this doesn&#8217;t show up on the plots with african populations. in fact, it doesn&#8217;t show up with east asians either. i think it&#8217;s something local to south asia, perhaps due to extreme inbreeding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pconroy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2010/08/strange-genetic-variation-in-south-asia/#comment-23822</link>
		<dc:creator>pconroy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 01:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=5397#comment-23822</guid>
		<description>What if the mysterious group are admixed with Malays? I&#039;ve always wondered where the settlers that arrived in Madagascar stopped off on the way.

Another possibility is Siddi admixture - after all Gujarat state is the main population center??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What if the mysterious group are admixed with Malays? I&#8217;ve always wondered where the settlers that arrived in Madagascar stopped off on the way.</p>
<p>Another possibility is Siddi admixture &#8211; after all Gujarat state is the main population center??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Razib Khan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2010/08/strange-genetic-variation-in-south-asia/#comment-23821</link>
		<dc:creator>Razib Khan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 20:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=5397#comment-23821</guid>
		<description>scythians were iranian speaking. they should be alone the main axis, not orthogonal. the first figure has muslims and i think a parsi or two who are probably good substitutes for iranians. so perhaps huns with mongolian ancestry? but that doesn&#039;t show up on structure which infer ancestry components (in fact, northeast indians have that).

two thoughts

1) this only shows up when you constrain the variation which you&#039;re using to extract dimensionalities. so it&#039;s something weird specific to south asia i think, and interpreting the PCA in a global context may mislead

2) the kalash are really strange in their positioning in south asia because they&#039;ve very inbred/genetically isolated. it could be the admixture of some group like this in the north/west of india, who arrived with the sakas, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>scythians were iranian speaking. they should be alone the main axis, not orthogonal. the first figure has muslims and i think a parsi or two who are probably good substitutes for iranians. so perhaps huns with mongolian ancestry? but that doesn&#8217;t show up on structure which infer ancestry components (in fact, northeast indians have that).</p>
<p>two thoughts</p>
<p>1) this only shows up when you constrain the variation which you&#8217;re using to extract dimensionalities. so it&#8217;s something weird specific to south asia i think, and interpreting the PCA in a global context may mislead</p>
<p>2) the kalash are really strange in their positioning in south asia because they&#8217;ve very inbred/genetically isolated. it could be the admixture of some group like this in the north/west of india, who arrived with the sakas, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thorfinn</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2010/08/strange-genetic-variation-in-south-asia/#comment-23820</link>
		<dc:creator>Thorfinn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 19:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=5397#comment-23820</guid>
		<description>What about a Saka/Scythian origin? That would explain why they are concentrated in North/Western groups, and lie orthogonal to the main axis. Reich&#039;s speculation--that they are Huns--also seems reasonable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about a Saka/Scythian origin? That would explain why they are concentrated in North/Western groups, and lie orthogonal to the main axis. Reich&#8217;s speculation&#8211;that they are Huns&#8211;also seems reasonable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Strange genetic variation in South Asia &#124; Gene Expression &#124; Discover Magazine -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2010/08/strange-genetic-variation-in-south-asia/#comment-23819</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Strange genetic variation in South Asia &#124; Gene Expression &#124; Discover Magazine -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 09:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=5397#comment-23819</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by razib khan, Maggie, Sains &amp; Teknologi, Al Poe, World Amazing Things and others. World Amazing Things said: Strange genetic variation in South Asia &#124; Gene Expression: Dienekes has a post up where he highlights the fact tha... http://bit.ly/bQTf1O [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by razib khan, Maggie, Sains &amp; Teknologi, Al Poe, World Amazing Things and others. World Amazing Things said: Strange genetic variation in South Asia | Gene Expression: Dienekes has a post up where he highlights the fact tha&#8230; <a href="http://bit.ly/bQTf1O" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/bQTf1O</a> [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
