<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Election 2010 Predictions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2010/10/election-2010-predictions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2010/10/election-2010-predictions/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 03:23:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ali Minai</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2010/10/election-2010-predictions/#comment-27482</link>
		<dc:creator>Ali Minai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 20:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=7519#comment-27482</guid>
		<description>Previous history occurred in a different media environment. I would not be suprised at all to see a 50/50 Senate and a 250/185 House.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Previous history occurred in a different media environment. I would not be suprised at all to see a 50/50 Senate and a 250/185 House.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: atyl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2010/10/election-2010-predictions/#comment-27481</link>
		<dc:creator>atyl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 22:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=7519#comment-27481</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;though I didn’t want to push my luck and give you an implausible value which you’d reject on the face of it.&lt;/i&gt;

It&#039;s implausible nonetheless, at least for me.  Not even the post-Watergate midterm election in 1974 (aided by another recession) or the &quot;Republican Revolution&quot; in 1994 (aided by redistricting) produced a landslide of that magnitude.  We&#039;d have to hearken back to the Depression for comparable losses/gains, and the economy was far worse for the average voter than they are now.

Then again, I&#039;m not brave enough to make a prediction, so who am I to criticize?  Tomorrow can&#039;t come soon enough.  If nothing else, at least the never-ending campaign ads will stop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>though I didn’t want to push my luck and give you an implausible value which you’d reject on the face of it.</i></p>
<p>It&#8217;s implausible nonetheless, at least for me.  Not even the post-Watergate midterm election in 1974 (aided by another recession) or the &#8220;Republican Revolution&#8221; in 1994 (aided by redistricting) produced a landslide of that magnitude.  We&#8217;d have to hearken back to the Depression for comparable losses/gains, and the economy was far worse for the average voter than they are now.</p>
<p>Then again, I&#8217;m not brave enough to make a prediction, so who am I to criticize?  Tomorrow can&#8217;t come soon enough.  If nothing else, at least the never-ending campaign ads will stop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denis Vluegt</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2010/10/election-2010-predictions/#comment-27480</link>
		<dc:creator>Denis Vluegt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 09:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=7519#comment-27480</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;the readership here leans a little Left&lt;/i&gt;

Razib, I guess it depends on your frame of reference, doesn&#039;t it? Just finished wading through the comments section on Paul &quot;The Sky Is Falling&quot; Krugman&#039;s latest screed in the New York Times. They are gnashing their teeth and rending their clothes in anticipation of tomorrow&#039;s electoral defeat.

I find the readership at GNXP refreshingly apolitical for the most part, or at least political in ways that go beyond the primitive Dem/Repub partisanship.

Then again, maybe you were pulling our leg; it&#039;s sometimes hard to tell {*g*}.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>the readership here leans a little Left</i></p>
<p>Razib, I guess it depends on your frame of reference, doesn&#8217;t it? Just finished wading through the comments section on Paul &#8220;The Sky Is Falling&#8221; Krugman&#8217;s latest screed in the New York Times. They are gnashing their teeth and rending their clothes in anticipation of tomorrow&#8217;s electoral defeat.</p>
<p>I find the readership at GNXP refreshingly apolitical for the most part, or at least political in ways that go beyond the primitive Dem/Repub partisanship.</p>
<p>Then again, maybe you were pulling our leg; it&#8217;s sometimes hard to tell {*g*}.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Razib Khan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2010/10/election-2010-predictions/#comment-27479</link>
		<dc:creator>Razib Khan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 00:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=7519#comment-27479</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt; But then you are absolutely right that I should not have dismissed FiveThirtyEight based on just one thing.&lt;/i&gt;

awesome. duly noted. nate actually will admit when he thinks intuitively his model is over/underweighting given inputs to generate weird probabilities and/or expectations. and he keeps harping in the fact that the variance around the e(x) is pretty big here. re: alaska, there&#039;s an underweighting of a recent polls, so that&#039;s probably explaining part of the disjunction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> But then you are absolutely right that I should not have dismissed FiveThirtyEight based on just one thing.</i></p>
<p>awesome. duly noted. nate actually will admit when he thinks intuitively his model is over/underweighting given inputs to generate weird probabilities and/or expectations. and he keeps harping in the fact that the variance around the e(x) is pretty big here. re: alaska, there&#8217;s an underweighting of a recent polls, so that&#8217;s probably explaining part of the disjunction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DK</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2010/10/election-2010-predictions/#comment-27478</link>
		<dc:creator>DK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2010 23:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=7519#comment-27478</guid>
		<description>&quot;am i wrong about your assumptions?&quot;

To an extent. I simply misread the numbers to indicate Murkowski in double digit lead, consistently and over more than a month - while in fact it is just one latest poll. Given how tight it is in reality, I buy into the theory that misspelling of her name will favor Miller. But then you are absolutely right that I should not have dismissed FiveThirtyEight based on just one thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;am i wrong about your assumptions?&#8221;</p>
<p>To an extent. I simply misread the numbers to indicate Murkowski in double digit lead, consistently and over more than a month &#8211; while in fact it is just one latest poll. Given how tight it is in reality, I buy into the theory that misspelling of her name will favor Miller. But then you are absolutely right that I should not have dismissed FiveThirtyEight based on just one thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Razib Khan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2010/10/election-2010-predictions/#comment-27477</link>
		<dc:creator>Razib Khan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2010 22:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=7519#comment-27477</guid>
		<description>no, the model is underestimating murkowski for sure. it&#039;s keeping track of lots of races, and so there are going to be plenty of bad inputs on the margin. it seemed kind of retarded to dismiss the source based on a weird race. am i wrong about your assumptions? (in any case, he has a significant margin of error too in the aggregate as well)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no, the model is underestimating murkowski for sure. it&#8217;s keeping track of lots of races, and so there are going to be plenty of bad inputs on the margin. it seemed kind of retarded to dismiss the source based on a weird race. am i wrong about your assumptions? (in any case, he has a significant margin of error too in the aggregate as well)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DK</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2010/10/election-2010-predictions/#comment-27476</link>
		<dc:creator>DK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2010 21:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=7519#comment-27476</guid>
		<description>Yep, I misread the polls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, I misread the polls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Razib Khan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2010/10/election-2010-predictions/#comment-27475</link>
		<dc:creator>Razib Khan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2010 21:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=7519#comment-27475</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;You are relying on a bad source. E.g., Murkowski (Ind) is a virtual lock to win in AK, yet FiveThirtyEight gives a win to Miller (GOP).&lt;/i&gt;

the assumptions behind that comment are so stupid that i&#039;ve definitely down-voted your credibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>You are relying on a bad source. E.g., Murkowski (Ind) is a virtual lock to win in AK, yet FiveThirtyEight gives a win to Miller (GOP).</i></p>
<p>the assumptions behind that comment are so stupid that i&#8217;ve definitely down-voted your credibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uncle Al</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2010/10/election-2010-predictions/#comment-27474</link>
		<dc:creator>Uncle Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2010 21:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=7519#comment-27474</guid>
		<description>In the countervailing spirit of Jorj X. McKie, Uncle Al&#039;s Tuesday 02 November ballot shall be voted to paralyze, thwart, negate, frustrate, and defund every aspect of government at all levels.  I have had my life’s fill of &lt;I&gt;saepe errans, numquam dubitans&lt;/I&gt;.

It is incompetent fascists, corporatists, and double-digit IQ christ-besotted jackasses running against bleeding heart Liberals, welfare pimps, Enviro-whiners, feminazis, and Queer Nation.  Choose wisely.

Humor plays close to the big, hot fire that is Truth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the countervailing spirit of Jorj X. McKie, Uncle Al&#8217;s Tuesday 02 November ballot shall be voted to paralyze, thwart, negate, frustrate, and defund every aspect of government at all levels.  I have had my life’s fill of <i>saepe errans, numquam dubitans</i>.</p>
<p>It is incompetent fascists, corporatists, and double-digit IQ christ-besotted jackasses running against bleeding heart Liberals, welfare pimps, Enviro-whiners, feminazis, and Queer Nation.  Choose wisely.</p>
<p>Humor plays close to the big, hot fire that is Truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DK</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2010/10/election-2010-predictions/#comment-27473</link>
		<dc:creator>DK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2010 21:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=7519#comment-27473</guid>
		<description>You are relying on a bad source. E.g., Murkowski (Ind) is a virtual lock to win in AK, yet FiveThirtyEight gives a win to Miller (GOP).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are relying on a bad source. E.g., Murkowski (Ind) is a virtual lock to win in AK, yet FiveThirtyEight gives a win to Miller (GOP).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2010/10/election-2010-predictions/#comment-27472</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2010 19:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=7519#comment-27472</guid>
		<description>And the future will be little different because of it.  Massive cuts in government will be forced by circumstances regardless of which party is in power.  One can only hope that our adventuristic, imperialist military/industrial complex will be the hardest hit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the future will be little different because of it.  Massive cuts in government will be forced by circumstances regardless of which party is in power.  One can only hope that our adventuristic, imperialist military/industrial complex will be the hardest hit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Election 2010 Predictions &#124; Gene Expression &#124; Discover Magazine -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2010/10/election-2010-predictions/#comment-27471</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Election 2010 Predictions &#124; Gene Expression &#124; Discover Magazine -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2010 07:23:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=7519#comment-27471</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Ron Simon, J.S., Maggie, m, World Amazing Things and others. World Amazing Things said: Election 2010 Predictions &#124; Gene Expression: For Congress, I think that the breakdown will be: Senate – 50 Republi... http://bit.ly/cNklZI [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Ron Simon, J.S., Maggie, m, World Amazing Things and others. World Amazing Things said: Election 2010 Predictions | Gene Expression: For Congress, I think that the breakdown will be: Senate – 50 Republi&#8230; <a href="http://bit.ly/cNklZI" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/cNklZI</a> [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
