The genomics future is almost now

By Razib Khan | October 23, 2010 1:51 pm

Stephen Hsu on developments at the Beijing Genomics Institute:

I was floored today when the director of BGI told me they would soon reach a sequencing rate of 1000 (human) genomes per day (so, 10^5 to 10^6 genomes per year is right on the horizon). According to him, they can be profitable at a price of $5k per genome! [Clarification: I later learned this might mean at 10x coverage … not exactly sure, although I tried to get a more precise statement.]

Five years ago I asked Armand Leroi:

[Q] 10) If in 10 years you could purchase your own full genome sequence for a month of your salary, would you do it? (assume privacy concerns are obviated)

[A] Yes.

It looks like I didn’t anticipate the rate of change in this area, as 10 years was also certainly too conservative or pessimistic. Dan MacArthur has given a plausible estimate of ~2 years for the realization of a $1,000 genome, but it looks like we’ll hit a genome at the cost of a month’s salary for a professional person on the order of months and not years.

CATEGORIZED UNDER: Genomics
MORE ABOUT: Genomics
  • Pingback: Tweets that mention The genomics future is almost now | Gene Expression | Discover Magazine -- Topsy.com()

  • Biologist

    This depends largely on definitions. Accuracy still has to improve a lot.

  • dave chamberlin

    Gordon Moore co-founder of Intel observed that every 18 months chip capacity doubles. Raymond Kurzweil, inventor of speech recognition software noted calculating power doubled every three years from 1910 to 1950. It doubled every 18 months from 1966 to 2000. It is now doubling every year. I can’t remember if Razib has ever graphed the decreasing cost of personal genomics and compared it to Moore’s Law.

  • http://infoproc.blogspot.com steve hsu

    Re: sequencing costs, it’s on a super-exponential (so, faster than Moore’s Law) path. However, a big contributor to this is the drop in computing costs. Taking short reads and reassembling them using big computers is currently the way to go.

  • kurt9

    Genomics data is useful for determining ancestry. However, the failure of genomic sequencing to identify the “genetic causes” of many diseases that were presumed to be genetic suggests that personal genomic sequencing may not be that useful for health care purposes. This is the reason why I’m unlikely to use any of these services even if genomic sequencing drops to $1000 per person. I think there’s a lot of hype in genomics.

  • Josh

    BGI genomes would not be the most accurate in the world… they are sort of known for their emphasis on quantity over quality.

  • Pingback: 30,000 full human genomes by January 1st, 2012? | Gene Expression | Discover Magazine()

NEW ON DISCOVER
OPEN
CITIZEN SCIENCE
ADVERTISEMENT

Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!

Gene Expression

This blog is about evolution, genetics, genomics and their interstices. Please beware that comments are aggressively moderated. Uncivil or churlish comments will likely get you banned immediately, so make any contribution count!

About Razib Khan

I have degrees in biology and biochemistry, a passion for genetics, history, and philosophy, and shrimp is my favorite food. In relation to nationality I'm a American Northwesterner, in politics I'm a reactionary, and as for religion I have none (I'm an atheist). If you want to know more, see the links at http://www.razib.com

ADVERTISEMENT

See More

ADVERTISEMENT

RSS Razib’s Pinboard

Edifying books

Collapse bottom bar
+

Login to your Account

X
E-mail address:
Password:
Remember me
Forgot your password?
No problem. Click here to have it e-mailed to you.

Not Registered Yet?

Register now for FREE. Registration only takes a few minutes to complete. Register now »