<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Moderates are dull, liberals are smarter, conservatives are middling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/02/moderates-are-dull-liberals-are-smarter-conservatives-are-middling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/02/moderates-are-dull-liberals-are-smarter-conservatives-are-middling/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 02:26:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Myth-OS &#124; Blog &#124;</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/02/moderates-are-dull-liberals-are-smarter-conservatives-are-middling/#comment-30578</link>
		<dc:creator>Myth-OS &#124; Blog &#124;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Feb 2011 08:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=9815#comment-30578</guid>
		<description>[...] 10:08 am in Uncategorized by admin      Moderates are dull, liberals are smarter, conservatives are middling &#124; Gene Expression &#124; Discover Ma [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 10:08 am in Uncategorized by admin      Moderates are dull, liberals are smarter, conservatives are middling | Gene Expression | Discover Ma [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Idlewilde</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/02/moderates-are-dull-liberals-are-smarter-conservatives-are-middling/#comment-30577</link>
		<dc:creator>Idlewilde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 07:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=9815#comment-30577</guid>
		<description>What about people who think political involvment is waste of time better spent on one&#039;s own friends, family, and interests? Or are those called independants? That would be interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about people who think political involvment is waste of time better spent on one&#8217;s own friends, family, and interests? Or are those called independants? That would be interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TGGP</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/02/moderates-are-dull-liberals-are-smarter-conservatives-are-middling/#comment-30576</link>
		<dc:creator>TGGP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 05:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=9815#comment-30576</guid>
		<description>From what I recall EDUC is a lot more fine-grained and can get people with varying amounts of even grade-school education.

John Emerson, I&#039;m thinking Philip Converse on moderates. The general public tends not to understand what those ideological terms even mean, and the dim may not have a strong enough grasp to identify with any ideology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I recall EDUC is a lot more fine-grained and can get people with varying amounts of even grade-school education.</p>
<p>John Emerson, I&#8217;m thinking Philip Converse on moderates. The general public tends not to understand what those ideological terms even mean, and the dim may not have a strong enough grasp to identify with any ideology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jb</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/02/moderates-are-dull-liberals-are-smarter-conservatives-are-middling/#comment-30575</link>
		<dc:creator>jb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 03:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=9815#comment-30575</guid>
		<description>People who go to college tend to be smarter than average.  If college actually influences people&#039;s thinking, and pushes them in a more liberal direction, then wouldn&#039;t we &lt;i&gt;expect&lt;/i&gt; that, as a result, liberals would end up smarter on average than conservatives?  (Imagine if all the smartest people went to college, and college converted 100% of them to liberalism!)

I&#039;m thinking in particular of my own college experience.  I&#039;m somewhat conservative now, but I was considerably more liberal in college.  I never felt any obvious pressure, it&#039;s just that liberalism was in the air, something that was assumed.  I gave up my religion in college.  It didn&#039;t take much of a push really, but I can think of a particular professor who gave me support.  I might have had a far more difficult time of it at a conservative Catholic institution!  Do we have any good information about the political leanings of college freshmen verses seniors?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People who go to college tend to be smarter than average.  If college actually influences people&#8217;s thinking, and pushes them in a more liberal direction, then wouldn&#8217;t we <i>expect</i> that, as a result, liberals would end up smarter on average than conservatives?  (Imagine if all the smartest people went to college, and college converted 100% of them to liberalism!)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m thinking in particular of my own college experience.  I&#8217;m somewhat conservative now, but I was considerably more liberal in college.  I never felt any obvious pressure, it&#8217;s just that liberalism was in the air, something that was assumed.  I gave up my religion in college.  It didn&#8217;t take much of a push really, but I can think of a particular professor who gave me support.  I might have had a far more difficult time of it at a conservative Catholic institution!  Do we have any good information about the political leanings of college freshmen verses seniors?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conservative Link Soup: Public Schools Rely on Testing, Ignore Critical Thinking and Apprenticeships &#171; The Right of the People</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/02/moderates-are-dull-liberals-are-smarter-conservatives-are-middling/#comment-30574</link>
		<dc:creator>Conservative Link Soup: Public Schools Rely on Testing, Ignore Critical Thinking and Apprenticeships &#171; The Right of the People</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 02:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=9815#comment-30574</guid>
		<description>[...] Moderates are dull, liberals are smarter, conservatives are middling &#124; Gene Expression (blogs.discovermagazine.com) [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Moderates are dull, liberals are smarter, conservatives are middling | Gene Expression (blogs.discovermagazine.com) [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: miko</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/02/moderates-are-dull-liberals-are-smarter-conservatives-are-middling/#comment-30573</link>
		<dc:creator>miko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 19:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=9815#comment-30573</guid>
		<description>Sorry Zerodash... I completely screwed up, I was attacking bob sykes ad hominemly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Zerodash&#8230; I completely screwed up, I was attacking bob sykes ad hominemly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Razib Khan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/02/moderates-are-dull-liberals-are-smarter-conservatives-are-middling/#comment-30572</link>
		<dc:creator>Razib Khan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 18:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=9815#comment-30572</guid>
		<description>miko, that was bob. and yes, yes, i know the continuum sucks. we get it. i don&#039;t fit well either. but it&#039;s the largest explanatory dimension. sorry, just how it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>miko, that was bob. and yes, yes, i know the continuum sucks. we get it. i don&#8217;t fit well either. but it&#8217;s the largest explanatory dimension. sorry, just how it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zerodash</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/02/moderates-are-dull-liberals-are-smarter-conservatives-are-middling/#comment-30571</link>
		<dc:creator>Zerodash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 18:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=9815#comment-30571</guid>
		<description>@miko

Wow, an ad hominem attack.  Classy.  Not sure where you even get TV news from my post, either.

Please demonstrate how my lack of &quot;emotional equilibrium&quot; has anything to do with my statement that the very terms &quot;liberal&quot; and &quot;conservative&quot; are vague and imperfect descriptors of people?  Is that not similar to what you just said?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@miko</p>
<p>Wow, an ad hominem attack.  Classy.  Not sure where you even get TV news from my post, either.</p>
<p>Please demonstrate how my lack of &#8220;emotional equilibrium&#8221; has anything to do with my statement that the very terms &#8220;liberal&#8221; and &#8220;conservative&#8221; are vague and imperfect descriptors of people?  Is that not similar to what you just said?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enema Cowboy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/02/moderates-are-dull-liberals-are-smarter-conservatives-are-middling/#comment-30570</link>
		<dc:creator>Enema Cowboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 18:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=9815#comment-30570</guid>
		<description>I also dislike the liberal-conservative continuum; I see it to be a false dichotomy.   If it is imperative to use a one-dimensional measurement, it should have anarchy on one end and totalitarianism on the other (or freedom/slavery).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also dislike the liberal-conservative continuum; I see it to be a false dichotomy.   If it is imperative to use a one-dimensional measurement, it should have anarchy on one end and totalitarianism on the other (or freedom/slavery).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: miko</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/02/moderates-are-dull-liberals-are-smarter-conservatives-are-middling/#comment-30569</link>
		<dc:creator>miko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 17:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=9815#comment-30569</guid>
		<description>I often have a hard time putting myself on a liberal-conservative scale. In the U.S., these are mostly team categories. As noted above, if you press people on particular issues, their team affinities often fall apart (a majority was against the health care bill, but for nearly everything it contained when asked as line items). Then there is the fact that I am certainly liberal by US standards, but not particularly so--particularly economically--by developed nation standards. Socially, I&#039;m liberal on many things, but there are many issues where I&#039;m not.

So then I sit with this stupid fucking linear scale, and pick a number. As with all scales like this, I think a large component of what&#039;s being measured is how different groups of people approach scales.

Zerodash, you should watch less TV news until you achieve some emotional equilibrium.  Which was the coherent part, Razib?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I often have a hard time putting myself on a liberal-conservative scale. In the U.S., these are mostly team categories. As noted above, if you press people on particular issues, their team affinities often fall apart (a majority was against the health care bill, but for nearly everything it contained when asked as line items). Then there is the fact that I am certainly liberal by US standards, but not particularly so&#8211;particularly economically&#8211;by developed nation standards. Socially, I&#8217;m liberal on many things, but there are many issues where I&#8217;m not.</p>
<p>So then I sit with this stupid fucking linear scale, and pick a number. As with all scales like this, I think a large component of what&#8217;s being measured is how different groups of people approach scales.</p>
<p>Zerodash, you should watch less TV news until you achieve some emotional equilibrium.  Which was the coherent part, Razib?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Malloy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/02/moderates-are-dull-liberals-are-smarter-conservatives-are-middling/#comment-30568</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Malloy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 17:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=9815#comment-30568</guid>
		<description>The latest &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.okcupid.com/index.php/the-best-questions-for-first-dates/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;OkTrends post&lt;/a&gt; finds that liberals in their data set prefer complexity significantly more than conservatives. It also finds that grammar (another fairly obvious proxy for IQ) is the strongest correlate of religiosity.

Strong atheists have the highest writing ability while centrist protestants have the worst.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The latest <a href="http://blog.okcupid.com/index.php/the-best-questions-for-first-dates/" rel="nofollow">OkTrends post</a> finds that liberals in their data set prefer complexity significantly more than conservatives. It also finds that grammar (another fairly obvious proxy for IQ) is the strongest correlate of religiosity.</p>
<p>Strong atheists have the highest writing ability while centrist protestants have the worst.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Razib Khan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/02/moderates-are-dull-liberals-are-smarter-conservatives-are-middling/#comment-30567</link>
		<dc:creator>Razib Khan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 16:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=9815#comment-30567</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt; As might be predicted from simply watching TV news, you show that that graduate degree holders are more likely to be ideologues and extremists. If anything, you chart are a good argument for denying graduate degree holders the right to vote, hold public office (elective or appointive) and serve on juries.&lt;/i&gt;

there you go again, veering between coherency and total question begging crap.

#1, yeah, good point. since i think most people are dull, i just stated in that way.

#2, i provided links so you can do the analysis yourself with those filters. i don&#039;t you&#039;ll do it though, you&#039;re probably a lazy fuck :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> As might be predicted from simply watching TV news, you show that that graduate degree holders are more likely to be ideologues and extremists. If anything, you chart are a good argument for denying graduate degree holders the right to vote, hold public office (elective or appointive) and serve on juries.</i></p>
<p>there you go again, veering between coherency and total question begging crap.</p>
<p>#1, yeah, good point. since i think most people are dull, i just stated in that way.</p>
<p>#2, i provided links so you can do the analysis yourself with those filters. i don&#8217;t you&#8217;ll do it though, you&#8217;re probably a lazy fuck <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/02/moderates-are-dull-liberals-are-smarter-conservatives-are-middling/#comment-30566</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 16:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=9815#comment-30566</guid>
		<description>Another article:

http://www.truth-out.org/america-not-politically-conservative-you-think66915</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another article:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.truth-out.org/america-not-politically-conservative-you-think66915" rel="nofollow">http://www.truth-out.org/america-not-politically-conservative-you-think66915</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/02/moderates-are-dull-liberals-are-smarter-conservatives-are-middling/#comment-30565</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 16:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=9815#comment-30565</guid>
		<description>People who self-identify as conservative often turn out to be more liberal when asked about specific issues.

http://www.alternet.org/teaparty/149561/americans_are_far_less_conservative_than_the_right_wing_claims/?page=entire</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People who self-identify as conservative often turn out to be more liberal when asked about specific issues.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org/teaparty/149561/americans_are_far_less_conservative_than_the_right_wing_claims/?page=entire" rel="nofollow">http://www.alternet.org/teaparty/149561/americans_are_far_less_conservative_than_the_right_wing_claims/?page=entire</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Emerson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/02/moderates-are-dull-liberals-are-smarter-conservatives-are-middling/#comment-30564</link>
		<dc:creator>John Emerson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 14:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=9815#comment-30564</guid>
		<description>Bob, you&#039;re assuming that the center is right. That&#039;s a common assumption, but there&#039;s no  truth in it. The center is just a statistical construction based on present opinion. (For example, the center is doubtful about evolution). One big chunk of the center has few ideas and very little information; it&#039;s very close to &quot;no opinion&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob, you&#8217;re assuming that the center is right. That&#8217;s a common assumption, but there&#8217;s no  truth in it. The center is just a statistical construction based on present opinion. (For example, the center is doubtful about evolution). One big chunk of the center has few ideas and very little information; it&#8217;s very close to &#8220;no opinion&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob sykes</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/02/moderates-are-dull-liberals-are-smarter-conservatives-are-middling/#comment-30563</link>
		<dc:creator>bob sykes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 13:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=9815#comment-30563</guid>
		<description>I  agree with Richard. The charts only prove that HS and BS holders tend to be more moderate that graduate degree holders, and that the latter are spread all over hell and back. As might be predicted from simply watching TV news, you show that that graduate degree holders are more likely to be ideologues and extremists. If anything, you chart are a good argument for denying graduate degree holders the right to vote, hold public office (elective or appointive) and serve on juries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I  agree with Richard. The charts only prove that HS and BS holders tend to be more moderate that graduate degree holders, and that the latter are spread all over hell and back. As might be predicted from simply watching TV news, you show that that graduate degree holders are more likely to be ideologues and extremists. If anything, you chart are a good argument for denying graduate degree holders the right to vote, hold public office (elective or appointive) and serve on juries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Emerson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/02/moderates-are-dull-liberals-are-smarter-conservatives-are-middling/#comment-30562</link>
		<dc:creator>John Emerson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 13:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=9815#comment-30562</guid>
		<description>I think of moderates as either people who are more or less satisfied with the status quo and wary of change (which is actually one definition of &quot;conservative&quot;) or else people lacking in aggression and self-confidence who don&#039;t want to make a fuss and don&#039;t really trust their own judgment.

One sort of conservative is  someone who firmly believes the basic truths they were taught when they were young, does not feel the need for new truths,  and is angry when they are challenged.

The less educated would tend to cluster in these groups, I would think, which would be 4 to 6.

To end up at 1 or 7 you&#039;d need some mix of self-confidence, aggression, and dissatisfaction.  Right now they look like they&#039;re no more than 10% combined, which suggests that our system is still fairly stable. As I understand, in 1932 about 45% of Germans were at one extreme or the other (Communist or Nazi).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think of moderates as either people who are more or less satisfied with the status quo and wary of change (which is actually one definition of &#8220;conservative&#8221;) or else people lacking in aggression and self-confidence who don&#8217;t want to make a fuss and don&#8217;t really trust their own judgment.</p>
<p>One sort of conservative is  someone who firmly believes the basic truths they were taught when they were young, does not feel the need for new truths,  and is angry when they are challenged.</p>
<p>The less educated would tend to cluster in these groups, I would think, which would be 4 to 6.</p>
<p>To end up at 1 or 7 you&#8217;d need some mix of self-confidence, aggression, and dissatisfaction.  Right now they look like they&#8217;re no more than 10% combined, which suggests that our system is still fairly stable. As I understand, in 1932 about 45% of Germans were at one extreme or the other (Communist or Nazi).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zerodash</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/02/moderates-are-dull-liberals-are-smarter-conservatives-are-middling/#comment-30561</link>
		<dc:creator>Zerodash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 12:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=9815#comment-30561</guid>
		<description>Honestly, I&#039;m not sure what this study is trying to prove when the terms &quot;Liberal&quot; and &quot;Conservative&quot; are both so nebulous.  For instance, there is the increasingly common idea of separating the social and the economic aspect of each &quot;side&quot; into distinct groups, which gives rise to people who, for instance, describe themselves as &quot;socially liberal but economically conservative&quot; and so forth.

I would rather see (if this study even has value in the first place- politics is still a nebulous concept) the distinction made between more specific political leanings.  Where do religious young-earth conservatives fare compared to hippie holistic liberals on the intelligence scale?  Likewise, where do conservative businessmen (business success requires smarts) fare against liberal college professors (again, requires smarts)?  These groups all fall within the crude definition of conservative and liberal, and yet likely represent different levels of intelligence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly, I&#8217;m not sure what this study is trying to prove when the terms &#8220;Liberal&#8221; and &#8220;Conservative&#8221; are both so nebulous.  For instance, there is the increasingly common idea of separating the social and the economic aspect of each &#8220;side&#8221; into distinct groups, which gives rise to people who, for instance, describe themselves as &#8220;socially liberal but economically conservative&#8221; and so forth.</p>
<p>I would rather see (if this study even has value in the first place- politics is still a nebulous concept) the distinction made between more specific political leanings.  Where do religious young-earth conservatives fare compared to hippie holistic liberals on the intelligence scale?  Likewise, where do conservative businessmen (business success requires smarts) fare against liberal college professors (again, requires smarts)?  These groups all fall within the crude definition of conservative and liberal, and yet likely represent different levels of intelligence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard D. Morey</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/02/moderates-are-dull-liberals-are-smarter-conservatives-are-middling/#comment-30560</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard D. Morey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 10:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=9815#comment-30560</guid>
		<description>Your plots do not support your claims, at least without additional analysis. &quot;Moderates are dull&quot; is a statement that P(S&#124;M) (the probability of being smart given that you are moderate) is low. But what you&#039;ve got is plots showing P(M&#124;S) - that is, the probability that you are moderate GIVEN that you are smart/average/dull. You&#039;re conditioning on the wrong thing.

If you want to find the inverse conditional, you need to use Bayes&#039; theorem; or, just do the other data analysis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your plots do not support your claims, at least without additional analysis. &#8220;Moderates are dull&#8221; is a statement that P(S|M) (the probability of being smart given that you are moderate) is low. But what you&#8217;ve got is plots showing P(M|S) &#8211; that is, the probability that you are moderate GIVEN that you are smart/average/dull. You&#8217;re conditioning on the wrong thing.</p>
<p>If you want to find the inverse conditional, you need to use Bayes&#8217; theorem; or, just do the other data analysis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
