<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Atlantic features &quot;headless fattie&quot;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/05/the-atlantic-features-headless-fattie/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/05/the-atlantic-features-headless-fattie/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 23:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/05/the-atlantic-features-headless-fattie/#comment-33283</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 01:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=11752#comment-33283</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m happy to say that in addition to a BMI of 27 being linked to longevity, both heavy and moderate drinkers live longer than teetotalers too.

http://singularityhub.com/2010/09/02/heavy-drinkers-outlive-non-drinkers-longevity-never-tasted-so-good/

&lt;i&gt;&quot;We hear of the conversion of water into wine at the marriage in Cana as of a miracle. But this conversion is, through the goodness of God, made every day before our eyes. Behold the rain which descends from heaven upon our vineyards, and which incorporates itself with the grapes, to be changed into wine; a constant proof that God loves us, and loves to see us happy.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;strong&gt;-- Benjamin Franklin&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m happy to say that in addition to a BMI of 27 being linked to longevity, both heavy and moderate drinkers live longer than teetotalers too.</p>
<p><a href="http://singularityhub.com/2010/09/02/heavy-drinkers-outlive-non-drinkers-longevity-never-tasted-so-good/" rel="nofollow">http://singularityhub.com/2010/09/02/heavy-drinkers-outlive-non-drinkers-longevity-never-tasted-so-good/</a></p>
<p><i>&#8220;We hear of the conversion of water into wine at the marriage in Cana as of a miracle. But this conversion is, through the goodness of God, made every day before our eyes. Behold the rain which descends from heaven upon our vineyards, and which incorporates itself with the grapes, to be changed into wine; a constant proof that God loves us, and loves to see us happy.&#8221;</i><br />
<strong>&#8211; Benjamin Franklin</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandgroper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/05/the-atlantic-features-headless-fattie/#comment-33282</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandgroper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 01:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=11752#comment-33282</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a good summary, to which I would add only a couple of things: (1) BMI was devised as a population-level indicator and can be misleading when applied at a personal level (e.g. a fit and very muscular individual with low body fat % will be misread as overweight), and (2) fat distribution matters, fat distributed over the abdomen and chest being more disadvantageous to health than fat distributed over the hips, buttocks and thighs.

Those two things help to confound the findings for people who are &#039;overweight&#039; according to BMI.

In addition to the so called &#039;fat paradox&#039; (i.e. healthy fat people), there are other anomalies, e.g. anecdotally I know an anomalously high number of slender, physically active, non-smoking, non-drinking middle aged southern Han males who have very high blood pressure, some of whom are also diabetic; and, curiously, have a high incidence of gout.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a good summary, to which I would add only a couple of things: (1) BMI was devised as a population-level indicator and can be misleading when applied at a personal level (e.g. a fit and very muscular individual with low body fat % will be misread as overweight), and (2) fat distribution matters, fat distributed over the abdomen and chest being more disadvantageous to health than fat distributed over the hips, buttocks and thighs.</p>
<p>Those two things help to confound the findings for people who are &#8216;overweight&#8217; according to BMI.</p>
<p>In addition to the so called &#8216;fat paradox&#8217; (i.e. healthy fat people), there are other anomalies, e.g. anecdotally I know an anomalously high number of slender, physically active, non-smoking, non-drinking middle aged southern Han males who have very high blood pressure, some of whom are also diabetic; and, curiously, have a high incidence of gout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: omar</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/05/the-atlantic-features-headless-fattie/#comment-33281</link>
		<dc:creator>omar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 15:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=11752#comment-33281</guid>
		<description>Prasad, The data are somewhat confusing and depend on whether you mean overweight as an older adult or overweight as a young person and future mortality 30 years down the road? Different populations have different results too, for example, Asians who are overweight have lower mortality than underweight asians even though asians get metabolic syndrome at lower BMI levels...the fatter Asians are better off Asians and being better off counts for more than being a bit fat. And so on. But if you look at a large number of studies of European populations, you do find that the IDEAL body weight may be 24 or 26, but there is very little difference as you move from 23 to about 28 or so, so finding the absolute lowest mortality association is interesting but its even more important to notice that nothing much happens to mortality from 23 to 28 BMI. And even above that point, really consistent and significant increases in all cause mortality dont happen till you hit 35 or so. So the panic about being at 27 or 28 is definitely unjustified.
The other point to keep in mind is that fitness trumps fatness until you get to really high BMIs. The mortality associated with being unfit is much greater than that associated with being overweight. Its just harder to spot in an airport line. The mortality risk from being a chronically stressed worrier or a divorced male may exceed that associated with being mildly obese, but we are not suggesting that we stop hiring people who worry too much or who get divorced (and the head of the Mayo clinic did suggest not hiring people who are fat).
The issue of smoking and lower weight is real, but doesnt change the good mortality stats of mildly overweight people.
Again, I am not saying obesity is not a risk for some diseases. I am saying the panic has reached irrational proportions and is targeting people who are not necessarily at risk. And there is enough noise in the data to suggest that using these epidemiologic findings to target individual persons is likely to create many many cases of harm. People who are thin (and I am thin, in case you were wondering) have little justification for feeling morally superior to those who are overweight. and so on..
Here is a representative abstract.

Obesity (Silver Spring). 2010 Jan;18(1):214-8. Epub 2009 Jun 18.
BMI and mortality: results from a national longitudinal study of Canadian adults.
Orpana HM, Berthelot JM, Kaplan MS, Feeny DH, McFarland B, Ross NA.
SourceHealth Analysis Division, Statistics Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. horpana@uottawa.ca

Abstract
Although a clear risk of mortality is associated with obesity, the risk of mortality associated with overweight is equivocal. The objective of this study is to estimate the relationship between BMI and all-cause mortality in a nationally representative sample of Canadian adults. A sample of 11,326 respondents aged &gt;or=25 in the 1994/1995 National Population Health Survey (Canada) was studied using Cox proportional hazards models. A significant increased risk of mortality over the 12 years of follow-up was observed for underweight (BMI &lt;18.5; relative risk (RR) = 1.73, P 35; RR = 1.36, P &lt;0.05). Overweight (BMI 25 to &lt;30) was associated with a significantly decreased risk of death (RR = 0.83, P 0.05). Our results are similar to those from other recent studies, confirming that underweight and obesity class II+ are clear risk factors for mortality, and showing that when compared to the acceptable BMI category, overweight appears to be protective against mortality. Obesity class I was not associated with an increased risk of mortality.

And some more interesting articles:
http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/post.cfm?id=the-best-body-mass-index-for-low-mo-2010-12-01
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21345101 (Asians)
http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/content/173/4/430.long (overweight may not be healthiest, but may still be longest lived)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prasad, The data are somewhat confusing and depend on whether you mean overweight as an older adult or overweight as a young person and future mortality 30 years down the road? Different populations have different results too, for example, Asians who are overweight have lower mortality than underweight asians even though asians get metabolic syndrome at lower BMI levels&#8230;the fatter Asians are better off Asians and being better off counts for more than being a bit fat. And so on. But if you look at a large number of studies of European populations, you do find that the IDEAL body weight may be 24 or 26, but there is very little difference as you move from 23 to about 28 or so, so finding the absolute lowest mortality association is interesting but its even more important to notice that nothing much happens to mortality from 23 to 28 BMI. And even above that point, really consistent and significant increases in all cause mortality dont happen till you hit 35 or so. So the panic about being at 27 or 28 is definitely unjustified.<br />
The other point to keep in mind is that fitness trumps fatness until you get to really high BMIs. The mortality associated with being unfit is much greater than that associated with being overweight. Its just harder to spot in an airport line. The mortality risk from being a chronically stressed worrier or a divorced male may exceed that associated with being mildly obese, but we are not suggesting that we stop hiring people who worry too much or who get divorced (and the head of the Mayo clinic did suggest not hiring people who are fat).<br />
The issue of smoking and lower weight is real, but doesnt change the good mortality stats of mildly overweight people.<br />
Again, I am not saying obesity is not a risk for some diseases. I am saying the panic has reached irrational proportions and is targeting people who are not necessarily at risk. And there is enough noise in the data to suggest that using these epidemiologic findings to target individual persons is likely to create many many cases of harm. People who are thin (and I am thin, in case you were wondering) have little justification for feeling morally superior to those who are overweight. and so on..<br />
Here is a representative abstract.</p>
<p>Obesity (Silver Spring). 2010 Jan;18(1):214-8. Epub 2009 Jun 18.<br />
BMI and mortality: results from a national longitudinal study of Canadian adults.<br />
Orpana HM, Berthelot JM, Kaplan MS, Feeny DH, McFarland B, Ross NA.<br />
SourceHealth Analysis Division, Statistics Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. <a href="mailto:horpana@uottawa.ca">horpana@uottawa.ca</a></p>
<p>Abstract<br />
Although a clear risk of mortality is associated with obesity, the risk of mortality associated with overweight is equivocal. The objective of this study is to estimate the relationship between BMI and all-cause mortality in a nationally representative sample of Canadian adults. A sample of 11,326 respondents aged &gt;or=25 in the 1994/1995 National Population Health Survey (Canada) was studied using Cox proportional hazards models. A significant increased risk of mortality over the 12 years of follow-up was observed for underweight (BMI &lt;18.5; relative risk (RR) = 1.73, P 35; RR = 1.36, P &lt;0.05). Overweight (BMI 25 to &lt;30) was associated with a significantly decreased risk of death (RR = 0.83, P 0.05). Our results are similar to those from other recent studies, confirming that underweight and obesity class II+ are clear risk factors for mortality, and showing that when compared to the acceptable BMI category, overweight appears to be protective against mortality. Obesity class I was not associated with an increased risk of mortality.</p>
<p>And some more interesting articles:<br />
<a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/post.cfm?id=the-best-body-mass-index-for-low-mo-2010-12-01" rel="nofollow">http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/post.cfm?id=the-best-body-mass-index-for-low-mo-2010-12-01</a><br />
<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21345101" rel="nofollow">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21345101</a> (Asians)<br />
<a href="http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/content/173/4/430.long" rel="nofollow">http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/content/173/4/430.long</a> (overweight may not be healthiest, but may still be longest lived)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fernando</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/05/the-atlantic-features-headless-fattie/#comment-33280</link>
		<dc:creator>Fernando</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 07:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=11752#comment-33280</guid>
		<description>Friends, various point of views may come to our mind when talking about weight management but the only fact is that its rather a way of living than an eating habit, if you are willing to eat more then the activities incurred in losing that energy must be directly proportional to the amount of energy obtained. this will then create a right balance. Weight is not  considered as  exponential, but if we make the correlation between being overweight and being obese, we will find that these are same words that carries different extent which give weight an exponential definition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Friends, various point of views may come to our mind when talking about weight management but the only fact is that its rather a way of living than an eating habit, if you are willing to eat more then the activities incurred in losing that energy must be directly proportional to the amount of energy obtained. this will then create a right balance. Weight is not  considered as  exponential, but if we make the correlation between being overweight and being obese, we will find that these are same words that carries different extent which give weight an exponential definition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandgroper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/05/the-atlantic-features-headless-fattie/#comment-33279</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandgroper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 03:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=11752#comment-33279</guid>
		<description>Robert - LOL! You sound like an energy-balance kind of guy. Life is so simple. How come so many guys with beer guts are experts on diet and exercise?

Melissa, I wanted to get your advice on something - the other day I was confronted by &quot;double boiled snow frog with deer placenta paste and fish maw.&quot; Would that be industrial food? For the record, I passed - I saw what the placenta looked like when my daughter was born, and there&#039;s no way I&#039;m putting that stuff in my mouth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert &#8211; LOL! You sound like an energy-balance kind of guy. Life is so simple. How come so many guys with beer guts are experts on diet and exercise?</p>
<p>Melissa, I wanted to get your advice on something &#8211; the other day I was confronted by &#8220;double boiled snow frog with deer placenta paste and fish maw.&#8221; Would that be industrial food? For the record, I passed &#8211; I saw what the placenta looked like when my daughter was born, and there&#8217;s no way I&#8217;m putting that stuff in my mouth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Razib Khan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/05/the-atlantic-features-headless-fattie/#comment-33278</link>
		<dc:creator>Razib Khan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 22:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=11752#comment-33278</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I guess you’re right, although I’d say it’s more aesthetic than moral&lt;/I&gt;

that&#039;s why i said &#039;human flourishing.&#039; really the issue with obesity is multi-textured. reducing to one element alone (health, beauty, reflection of self-control) misses the bigger picture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I guess you’re right, although I’d say it’s more aesthetic than moral</i></p>
<p>that&#8217;s why i said &#8216;human flourishing.&#8217; really the issue with obesity is multi-textured. reducing to one element alone (health, beauty, reflection of self-control) misses the bigger picture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris w</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/05/the-atlantic-features-headless-fattie/#comment-33277</link>
		<dc:creator>chris w</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 22:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=11752#comment-33277</guid>
		<description>I guess you&#039;re right, although I&#039;d say it&#039;s more aesthetic than moral.  People just don&#039;t like seeing it, myself included -- my desire to see the sale of sweetened and processed foods taxed/restricted is aesthetically motivated.  One might say that aesthetic preferences don&#039;t form a legitimate basis for policy, but if a sufficient number of powerful people share said preferences, they certainly can: building codes that mandate certain architectural styles, HOAs that prohibit you from painting your door a wrong color, greenbelts and greenspaces, etc.  Bans against public nudity might also fall under that scope -- the initial justification might have been religious, but whenever discussion of overturning such bans occurs, somebody will always say, &quot;I don&#039;t think I should be forcibly subjected to the view of somebody else walking around nude, especially considering how many fat/old/hairy/whatever people live in this town.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess you&#8217;re right, although I&#8217;d say it&#8217;s more aesthetic than moral.  People just don&#8217;t like seeing it, myself included &#8212; my desire to see the sale of sweetened and processed foods taxed/restricted is aesthetically motivated.  One might say that aesthetic preferences don&#8217;t form a legitimate basis for policy, but if a sufficient number of powerful people share said preferences, they certainly can: building codes that mandate certain architectural styles, HOAs that prohibit you from painting your door a wrong color, greenbelts and greenspaces, etc.  Bans against public nudity might also fall under that scope &#8212; the initial justification might have been religious, but whenever discussion of overturning such bans occurs, somebody will always say, &#8220;I don&#8217;t think I should be forcibly subjected to the view of somebody else walking around nude, especially considering how many fat/old/hairy/whatever people live in this town.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: prasad</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/05/the-atlantic-features-headless-fattie/#comment-33276</link>
		<dc:creator>prasad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 22:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=11752#comment-33276</guid>
		<description>&quot;Most modestly overweight people are NOT unhealthy (the “healthiest” BMI for White people is around 27, which the CDC for some reason classifies as mildly overweight&quot;

Omar, I haven&#039;t followed this recently or much. Is this robust? I seem to remember something about smokers accounting for it, because cigarettes make you you slimmer, but not healthier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Most modestly overweight people are NOT unhealthy (the “healthiest” BMI for White people is around 27, which the CDC for some reason classifies as mildly overweight&#8221;</p>
<p>Omar, I haven&#8217;t followed this recently or much. Is this robust? I seem to remember something about smokers accounting for it, because cigarettes make you you slimmer, but not healthier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Razib Khan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/05/the-atlantic-features-headless-fattie/#comment-33275</link>
		<dc:creator>Razib Khan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 20:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=11752#comment-33275</guid>
		<description>chris, but your comment does validate omar&#039;s contention that there&#039;s a *moral* dimension to it. though i think a lot of these issues fall under &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eudaimonia&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;eudaimonia&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>chris, but your comment does validate omar&#8217;s contention that there&#8217;s a *moral* dimension to it. though i think a lot of these issues fall under <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eudaimonia" rel="nofollow">eudaimonia</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris w</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/05/the-atlantic-features-headless-fattie/#comment-33274</link>
		<dc:creator>chris w</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 19:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=11752#comment-33274</guid>
		<description>&quot; but my point is that the moral panic about obesity is now crossing the bounds of rational concern into the very human tendency of humans to gloat about their supposed superiority over a group now identified as morally inferior.&quot;

Sorry, but it&#039;s a drag to live in a country with such high levels of obesity, in part because it artificially inflates the value and ego of remaining thin women and also because it makes the experience of being in public much less pleasant.  I like to see pretty things as I walk down the street.  When you visit Europe, you realize what a drastic difference it makes in terms of the quality of life.  Why would we want want that here?  Whenever I return from Europe, I take one look at the size of the women at the airport that I return to, and go, &quot;Great...I&#039;m home.  Why, America?  Why?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; but my point is that the moral panic about obesity is now crossing the bounds of rational concern into the very human tendency of humans to gloat about their supposed superiority over a group now identified as morally inferior.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sorry, but it&#8217;s a drag to live in a country with such high levels of obesity, in part because it artificially inflates the value and ego of remaining thin women and also because it makes the experience of being in public much less pleasant.  I like to see pretty things as I walk down the street.  When you visit Europe, you realize what a drastic difference it makes in terms of the quality of life.  Why would we want want that here?  Whenever I return from Europe, I take one look at the size of the women at the airport that I return to, and go, &#8220;Great&#8230;I&#8217;m home.  Why, America?  Why?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/05/the-atlantic-features-headless-fattie/#comment-33273</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 18:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=11752#comment-33273</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;I’m guessing you are a tad bit pudgy&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

I already said that in post #3.  Although I&#039;m actually increasingly more saggy than pudgy as I progress through my 60&#039;s.

&lt;I&gt;&quot;And yes, some people who are just moderately overweight don’t lose weight merely by cutting calories and exercising. Have you ever heard of set-point theory? Leptin resistance?&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Faddist hoo-hah.  The number of long-term scientific dietetic studies where the subjects food intake was closely monitored 24/7 are practically non-existent.  People cheat.

Any &quot;moderately over-weight&quot; healthy human omnivore just needs to &lt;strong&gt;add some extra exercise&lt;/strong&gt; or cut-out a meal or two to get over any &quot;set-points.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;I’m guessing you are a tad bit pudgy&#8221;</i></p>
<p>I already said that in post #3.  Although I&#8217;m actually increasingly more saggy than pudgy as I progress through my 60&#8242;s.</p>
<p><i>&#8220;And yes, some people who are just moderately overweight don’t lose weight merely by cutting calories and exercising. Have you ever heard of set-point theory? Leptin resistance?&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Faddist hoo-hah.  The number of long-term scientific dietetic studies where the subjects food intake was closely monitored 24/7 are practically non-existent.  People cheat.</p>
<p>Any &#8220;moderately over-weight&#8221; healthy human omnivore just needs to <strong>add some extra exercise</strong> or cut-out a meal or two to get over any &#8220;set-points.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melissa</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/05/the-atlantic-features-headless-fattie/#comment-33272</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 18:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=11752#comment-33272</guid>
		<description>&quot;food faddism&quot;? I simply don&#039;t eat industrial foods. If it&#039;s a fad then it&#039;s as old as humans themselves.

&quot;Over concern for personal appearance or worse yet, other peoples appearance is a sign that you are either a girl or gay.&quot;

I&#039;m guessing you are a tad bit pudgy ;) Dudes are quite concerned with the physical appearance of women. I got way more attention from men when I ditched the spare tire. I totally admit that I&#039;m a girl though.

And yes, some people who are just moderately overweight don&#039;t lose weight merely by cutting calories and exercising. Have you ever heard of set-point theory? Leptin resistance? I guess you could argue everyone overweight has a pathological metabolic disorder though.



We aren&#039;t talking about appearance per se here, we are talkin about metabolic syndrome. It is true that some people have this without having obesity. There is a good amount of evidence these people consume more health care dollars. I don&#039;t want kids in school being made to feel bad about being fat, but I don&#039;t want it preached as a &quot;lifestyle choice&quot; either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;food faddism&#8221;? I simply don&#8217;t eat industrial foods. If it&#8217;s a fad then it&#8217;s as old as humans themselves.</p>
<p>&#8220;Over concern for personal appearance or worse yet, other peoples appearance is a sign that you are either a girl or gay.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m guessing you are a tad bit pudgy <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  Dudes are quite concerned with the physical appearance of women. I got way more attention from men when I ditched the spare tire. I totally admit that I&#8217;m a girl though.</p>
<p>And yes, some people who are just moderately overweight don&#8217;t lose weight merely by cutting calories and exercising. Have you ever heard of set-point theory? Leptin resistance? I guess you could argue everyone overweight has a pathological metabolic disorder though.</p>
<p>We aren&#8217;t talking about appearance per se here, we are talkin about metabolic syndrome. It is true that some people have this without having obesity. There is a good amount of evidence these people consume more health care dollars. I don&#8217;t want kids in school being made to feel bad about being fat, but I don&#8217;t want it preached as a &#8220;lifestyle choice&#8221; either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/05/the-atlantic-features-headless-fattie/#comment-33271</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 17:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=11752#comment-33271</guid>
		<description>Over concern for personal appearance or worse yet, other peoples appearance is a sign that you are either a girl or gay.

&lt;i&gt;&quot;Part of them problem is that people are told to just eat less and exercise and they’ll be thin.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Why is it a &quot;problem&quot; since it is true of anyone without a pathological metabolic disorder.  Although I will concede that food faddism is only a sign of being female rather than homosexual.  In fact, given the widespread prevalence of fat lesbians, I would say the preponderance of food faddists are heterosexual girls (with a slight sprinkling of right-wing anti-vaccination/flouride nuts.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over concern for personal appearance or worse yet, other peoples appearance is a sign that you are either a girl or gay.</p>
<p><i>&#8220;Part of them problem is that people are told to just eat less and exercise and they’ll be thin.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Why is it a &#8220;problem&#8221; since it is true of anyone without a pathological metabolic disorder.  Although I will concede that food faddism is only a sign of being female rather than homosexual.  In fact, given the widespread prevalence of fat lesbians, I would say the preponderance of food faddists are heterosexual girls (with a slight sprinkling of right-wing anti-vaccination/flouride nuts.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandgroper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/05/the-atlantic-features-headless-fattie/#comment-33270</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandgroper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 16:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=11752#comment-33270</guid>
		<description>But you eat goats   :)

&quot;most people wouldn’t care very much about that lifestyle choice if we didn’t think it cost more of our tax dollars.&quot;

Except the problem you mentioned - fat bastards get in the way. This is not trivial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But you eat goats   <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>&#8220;most people wouldn’t care very much about that lifestyle choice if we didn’t think it cost more of our tax dollars.&#8221;</p>
<p>Except the problem you mentioned &#8211; fat bastards get in the way. This is not trivial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melissa</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/05/the-atlantic-features-headless-fattie/#comment-33269</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 16:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=11752#comment-33269</guid>
		<description>Part of them problem is that people are told to just eat less and exercise and they&#039;ll be thin. I didn&#039;t lose weight when I tried that, in fact I just kept gaining. I didn&#039;t lose weight until I changed the &lt;i&gt;kind&lt;/i&gt; of food I ate.

Either way, it&#039;s kind of amusing that most fat acceptance folks are lefty because a lot of dislike for the obese is rooted in the fact that people perceive them as taking up more than their fair share of government-provided resources like health care. Whether that&#039;s true remains to be seen, but most people wouldn&#039;t care very much about that lifestyle choice if we didn&#039;t think it cost more of our tax dollars.

It&#039;s interesting about the Swedes because compare their obesity rates to the Finnish, despite almost identical food cultures. The Finnish are much heavier in general and rates of many &quot;diseases of civilization&quot; are much higher in that rather genetically distinct population. Some Finns told me that they think it&#039;s because they are closer to hunter-gatherers. Either way, their diets look so much better than the diets of the &quot;transitional&quot; populations where obesity is such a big problem like India, Saudi Arabia, the Pacific Islands, Mexico. Lots of whole foods, many full-fat...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Part of them problem is that people are told to just eat less and exercise and they&#8217;ll be thin. I didn&#8217;t lose weight when I tried that, in fact I just kept gaining. I didn&#8217;t lose weight until I changed the <i>kind</i> of food I ate.</p>
<p>Either way, it&#8217;s kind of amusing that most fat acceptance folks are lefty because a lot of dislike for the obese is rooted in the fact that people perceive them as taking up more than their fair share of government-provided resources like health care. Whether that&#8217;s true remains to be seen, but most people wouldn&#8217;t care very much about that lifestyle choice if we didn&#8217;t think it cost more of our tax dollars.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s interesting about the Swedes because compare their obesity rates to the Finnish, despite almost identical food cultures. The Finnish are much heavier in general and rates of many &#8220;diseases of civilization&#8221; are much higher in that rather genetically distinct population. Some Finns told me that they think it&#8217;s because they are closer to hunter-gatherers. Either way, their diets look so much better than the diets of the &#8220;transitional&#8221; populations where obesity is such a big problem like India, Saudi Arabia, the Pacific Islands, Mexico. Lots of whole foods, many full-fat&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: omar</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/05/the-atlantic-features-headless-fattie/#comment-33268</link>
		<dc:creator>omar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 16:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=11752#comment-33268</guid>
		<description>Obesity is a health problem but the moral panic about obesity is definitely generating its own irrational exuberance and needs to be kept in perspective. Most modestly overweight people are NOT unhealthy (the &quot;healthiest&quot; BMI for White people is around 27, which the CDC for some reason classifies as mildly overweight) and some very overweight people are doing OK too. Again, its not that obesity does not increase your risk for some diseases, it does. But a number of thinnies who are smirking about &quot;fatties&quot; are going to conk off before those fatties do. That is not an original observation, but my point is that the moral panic about obesity is now crossing the bounds of rational concern into the very human tendency of humans to gloat about their supposed superiority over a group now identified as morally inferior.
http://ije.oxfordjournals.org/content/35/1/55.full.pdf
http://www.today.ucla.edu/portal/ut/060523voice_obesity.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obesity is a health problem but the moral panic about obesity is definitely generating its own irrational exuberance and needs to be kept in perspective. Most modestly overweight people are NOT unhealthy (the &#8220;healthiest&#8221; BMI for White people is around 27, which the CDC for some reason classifies as mildly overweight) and some very overweight people are doing OK too. Again, its not that obesity does not increase your risk for some diseases, it does. But a number of thinnies who are smirking about &#8220;fatties&#8221; are going to conk off before those fatties do. That is not an original observation, but my point is that the moral panic about obesity is now crossing the bounds of rational concern into the very human tendency of humans to gloat about their supposed superiority over a group now identified as morally inferior.<br />
<a href="http://ije.oxfordjournals.org/content/35/1/55.full.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://ije.oxfordjournals.org/content/35/1/55.full.pdf</a><br />
<a href="http://www.today.ucla.edu/portal/ut/060523voice_obesity.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.today.ucla.edu/portal/ut/060523voice_obesity.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandgroper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/05/the-atlantic-features-headless-fattie/#comment-33267</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandgroper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 14:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=11752#comment-33267</guid>
		<description>Michelle, sometimes I wonder why I do it - a lot of my friends have asked how I have managed to keep it up long term.  Even my doctor asked me. When your doctor asks for your advice on keeping fit, it makes you think - anyway, the bastard didn&#039;t offer to pay me, so I didn&#039;t tell him   :)

My wife tells everyone that I&#039;m wonderfully self-disciplined, but it&#039;s not that. I have to conclude that it&#039;s basically just because I enjoy it - I enjoy doing it, and enjoy what it does to me. I feel like shit if I don&#039;t do it. But that&#039;s me, not everyone.

So I think it&#039;s really not helpful to tell fat people that the secret to becoming less fat is to be more physically active. In my case, I do think that exercise is more important than diet, within reason. But I have some close family who are obese, and I know what it&#039;s like for them - it&#039;s really not helpful to keep telling them they need to be more active, they know. I can tell them what to do, but that&#039;s the easy part. The hard part is to find a physical activity that is enjoyable, and find the time to do it, because essentially it needs to become like breathing. Everyone is different, and what I might find induces euphoria is just unmitigated torture for other people.

I&#039;m not unsympathetic to fat liberation, but it would seem perverse to make a virtue of it - there has to be a solution for people who don&#039;t want to be fat. There is - exercise strenuously every day, and be intelligently selective about what you eat and drink - experiment with what works for you, because everyone is different, but there are some obvious general fundamentals. But saying that is a lot easier than doing it long term for a lot of people, and once they become genuinely obese, it becomes hugely difficult.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michelle, sometimes I wonder why I do it &#8211; a lot of my friends have asked how I have managed to keep it up long term.  Even my doctor asked me. When your doctor asks for your advice on keeping fit, it makes you think &#8211; anyway, the bastard didn&#8217;t offer to pay me, so I didn&#8217;t tell him   <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>My wife tells everyone that I&#8217;m wonderfully self-disciplined, but it&#8217;s not that. I have to conclude that it&#8217;s basically just because I enjoy it &#8211; I enjoy doing it, and enjoy what it does to me. I feel like shit if I don&#8217;t do it. But that&#8217;s me, not everyone.</p>
<p>So I think it&#8217;s really not helpful to tell fat people that the secret to becoming less fat is to be more physically active. In my case, I do think that exercise is more important than diet, within reason. But I have some close family who are obese, and I know what it&#8217;s like for them &#8211; it&#8217;s really not helpful to keep telling them they need to be more active, they know. I can tell them what to do, but that&#8217;s the easy part. The hard part is to find a physical activity that is enjoyable, and find the time to do it, because essentially it needs to become like breathing. Everyone is different, and what I might find induces euphoria is just unmitigated torture for other people.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not unsympathetic to fat liberation, but it would seem perverse to make a virtue of it &#8211; there has to be a solution for people who don&#8217;t want to be fat. There is &#8211; exercise strenuously every day, and be intelligently selective about what you eat and drink &#8211; experiment with what works for you, because everyone is different, but there are some obvious general fundamentals. But saying that is a lot easier than doing it long term for a lot of people, and once they become genuinely obese, it becomes hugely difficult.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EcoPhysioMichelle</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/05/the-atlantic-features-headless-fattie/#comment-33266</link>
		<dc:creator>EcoPhysioMichelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 12:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=11752#comment-33266</guid>
		<description>Sandgroper, IIRC you already have a lady committed to spending her life with you, so I don&#039;t think you&#039;re doing anything for nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sandgroper, IIRC you already have a lady committed to spending her life with you, so I don&#8217;t think you&#8217;re doing anything for nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toto</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/05/the-atlantic-features-headless-fattie/#comment-33265</link>
		<dc:creator>toto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 11:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=11752#comment-33265</guid>
		<description>OT: Notice that while the &quot;fattie&quot; is charitably left headless, the unconvicted, supposedly-innocent-until-proven-guilty DSK is shown in full infamy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OT: Notice that while the &#8220;fattie&#8221; is charitably left headless, the unconvicted, supposedly-innocent-until-proven-guilty DSK is shown in full infamy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Domino</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/05/the-atlantic-features-headless-fattie/#comment-33264</link>
		<dc:creator>Domino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 09:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=11752#comment-33264</guid>
		<description>I wonder if there is a connection between this post, and your post above about the genetics of Swedes. If the Scandos are healthy and slim, could it be because agriculture was a late-comer? Agriculture is just step one in the mechanisation of food. When you get the extremes of processed food, you see fat epidemics, as in Arabia and the South Pacific.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if there is a connection between this post, and your post above about the genetics of Swedes. If the Scandos are healthy and slim, could it be because agriculture was a late-comer? Agriculture is just step one in the mechanisation of food. When you get the extremes of processed food, you see fat epidemics, as in Arabia and the South Pacific.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
