<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t overgeneralize about 2.5 billion people</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/10/dont-overgeneralize-about-2-5-billion-people/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/10/dont-overgeneralize-about-2-5-billion-people/</link>
	<description>Human evolution, genetics, genomics and their interstices</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 00:28:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Sailer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/10/dont-overgeneralize-about-2-5-billion-people/comment-page-1/#comment-96757</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Sailer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2011 09:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=14194#comment-96757</guid>
		<description>Thanks. Most informative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks. Most informative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ohwilleke</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/10/dont-overgeneralize-about-2-5-billion-people/comment-page-1/#comment-95701</link>
		<dc:creator>ohwilleke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 18:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=14194#comment-95701</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d be curious to know just how strongly some of the socio-economic standard correlates of linked to each other in either absolute or relative terms.  How good a proxy for other variables, for example, is fertility or PPP?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be curious to know just how strongly some of the socio-economic standard correlates of linked to each other in either absolute or relative terms.  How good a proxy for other variables, for example, is fertility or PPP?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eerikki</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/10/dont-overgeneralize-about-2-5-billion-people/comment-page-1/#comment-95656</link>
		<dc:creator>Eerikki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 12:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=14194#comment-95656</guid>
		<description>You should consider using the non-PPP-data as well. PPP is not a good comparison when comparing different countries as it gets higher with cheap labour force (and thus lowers the European mesurement even though the whole world is very cheap to Europeans to travel).

Poland is not a very good European comparison as it is post-socialist country and thus much lower in GDP than most other EU countries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should consider using the non-PPP-data as well. PPP is not a good comparison when comparing different countries as it gets higher with cheap labour force (and thus lowers the European mesurement even though the whole world is very cheap to Europeans to travel).</p>
<p>Poland is not a very good European comparison as it is post-socialist country and thus much lower in GDP than most other EU countries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Handle</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/10/dont-overgeneralize-about-2-5-billion-people/comment-page-1/#comment-95593</link>
		<dc:creator>Handle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 00:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=14194#comment-95593</guid>
		<description>Makes you wonder how granular US GDPPC would fit on those graphs, maybe at the county or zip-code level.  What I really want to see is something like &quot;local real personal income less external government (state or federal) transfer payments per capita&quot; to get a feel for the actual private output and productivity of the people in any particular area.  My guess is that there are plenty of US areas that have not much more per-capita production than what we usually consider to be very poor places throughout the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Makes you wonder how granular US GDPPC would fit on those graphs, maybe at the county or zip-code level.  What I really want to see is something like &#8220;local real personal income less external government (state or federal) transfer payments per capita&#8221; to get a feel for the actual private output and productivity of the people in any particular area.  My guess is that there are plenty of US areas that have not much more per-capita production than what we usually consider to be very poor places throughout the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-05-26 03:05:00 -->
