<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is sorting mysterious to Jesse Bering?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/11/is-sorting-mysterious-to-jesse-bering/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/11/is-sorting-mysterious-to-jesse-bering/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 07:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: omar</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/11/is-sorting-mysterious-to-jesse-bering/#comment-37890</link>
		<dc:creator>omar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 21:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=14507#comment-37890</guid>
		<description>As others have stated, the true number of people who don&#039;t care enough about religion to have it come in the way of everyday happiness is actually huge. Fanatics who are absolutely sure that Allah will smite them if they dont make their spouse do X or Y is much smaller. Vocal atheists who really really hate the notion of doing anything &quot;religious&quot; should not marry a vocal religious person who really really believes in doing everything his or her religion orders;  all other combinations are possible on a case by case basis..
About believer wives and their need submit, I have seen cases in Pakistan where the injunction to submit to the husband was interpreted to mean that a religious wife will not drink alcohol with him and will not approve of his drinking, but will go so far as to bring glasses and ice for drinking alcohol. Humans are adaptable. Even religious people adapt. So do atheists.
America, with relentless instruction to &quot;be true to yourself&quot; is a relatively less hypocritical/accomodating society, but even here some compromise may be seen. In most &quot;traditional&quot; societies, compromise and mild hypocrisy are a way of life. An interesting side note: youngsters who grow up in religious households in the US are sometimes far more intolerant in practice than their parents. Something about an American education teaches them that if X is true, then you must live by X. That is NOT the message in Pakistan. X is true, but life is more important, at least until the wahabis and true believers take over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As others have stated, the true number of people who don&#8217;t care enough about religion to have it come in the way of everyday happiness is actually huge. Fanatics who are absolutely sure that Allah will smite them if they dont make their spouse do X or Y is much smaller. Vocal atheists who really really hate the notion of doing anything &#8220;religious&#8221; should not marry a vocal religious person who really really believes in doing everything his or her religion orders;  all other combinations are possible on a case by case basis..<br />
About believer wives and their need submit, I have seen cases in Pakistan where the injunction to submit to the husband was interpreted to mean that a religious wife will not drink alcohol with him and will not approve of his drinking, but will go so far as to bring glasses and ice for drinking alcohol. Humans are adaptable. Even religious people adapt. So do atheists.<br />
America, with relentless instruction to &#8220;be true to yourself&#8221; is a relatively less hypocritical/accomodating society, but even here some compromise may be seen. In most &#8220;traditional&#8221; societies, compromise and mild hypocrisy are a way of life. An interesting side note: youngsters who grow up in religious households in the US are sometimes far more intolerant in practice than their parents. Something about an American education teaches them that if X is true, then you must live by X. That is NOT the message in Pakistan. X is true, but life is more important, at least until the wahabis and true believers take over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris T</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/11/is-sorting-mysterious-to-jesse-bering/#comment-37889</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=14507#comment-37889</guid>
		<description>People here actually read Slate?  I gave up on the site due to the quality of the articles and commenters a while ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People here actually read Slate?  I gave up on the site due to the quality of the articles and commenters a while ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Nydorf</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/11/is-sorting-mysterious-to-jesse-bering/#comment-37888</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Nydorf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=14507#comment-37888</guid>
		<description>The primary meaning of &#039;godless&#039; is &#039;wicked or unprincipled&#039;. It should not be used as a synonym for &#039;atheistic.&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The primary meaning of &#8216;godless&#8217; is &#8216;wicked or unprincipled&#8217;. It should not be used as a synonym for &#8216;atheistic.&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spike Gomes</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/11/is-sorting-mysterious-to-jesse-bering/#comment-37887</link>
		<dc:creator>Spike Gomes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 04:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=14507#comment-37887</guid>
		<description>April:

That&#039;s why you gotta love okcupid&#039;s system of not only marking one&#039;s religion on the profile but one&#039;s level of adherence to it.

For me a level of adherence that says &quot;laughing about it&quot; is far more important than &quot;atheist&quot; matching. I don&#039;t want to date someone like the Skepchick anymore than I want to date Michelle Bachmann.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>April:</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why you gotta love okcupid&#8217;s system of not only marking one&#8217;s religion on the profile but one&#8217;s level of adherence to it.</p>
<p>For me a level of adherence that says &#8220;laughing about it&#8221; is far more important than &#8220;atheist&#8221; matching. I don&#8217;t want to date someone like the Skepchick anymore than I want to date Michelle Bachmann.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: April Brown</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/11/is-sorting-mysterious-to-jesse-bering/#comment-37886</link>
		<dc:creator>April Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 01:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=14507#comment-37886</guid>
		<description>Practically, in terms of relationships, the definition for &#039;aetheist&#039; should really be broadened to include those who don&#039;t think a diety is relevant, even if it does exist.  That accounts for all the people who mark down a religion on the census but aren&#039;t religious.  That&#039;s basically the same thing as aetheist when being married and raising kids, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Practically, in terms of relationships, the definition for &#8216;aetheist&#8217; should really be broadened to include those who don&#8217;t think a diety is relevant, even if it does exist.  That accounts for all the people who mark down a religion on the census but aren&#8217;t religious.  That&#8217;s basically the same thing as aetheist when being married and raising kids, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darkseid</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/11/is-sorting-mysterious-to-jesse-bering/#comment-37885</link>
		<dc:creator>Darkseid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 00:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=14507#comment-37885</guid>
		<description>yeah, he&#039;s a horrible troll of a science &quot;writer.&quot;  definitely my least favorite on the web</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, he&#8217;s a horrible troll of a science &#8220;writer.&#8221;  definitely my least favorite on the web</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ohwilleke</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/11/is-sorting-mysterious-to-jesse-bering/#comment-37884</link>
		<dc:creator>ohwilleke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 23:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=14507#comment-37884</guid>
		<description>In practice, there are lots of ways to smooth over the differences with a bit of compromise.  Religion&#039;s salience is not the same to every person; and different parts of religion matter to different people.  Giving up some recognition of Christmas is much harder than giving up weekly attendance at religious ceremonies, for example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In practice, there are lots of ways to smooth over the differences with a bit of compromise.  Religion&#8217;s salience is not the same to every person; and different parts of religion matter to different people.  Giving up some recognition of Christmas is much harder than giving up weekly attendance at religious ceremonies, for example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomasz R.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/11/is-sorting-mysterious-to-jesse-bering/#comment-37883</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 22:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=14507#comment-37883</guid>
		<description>Is it bad when an atheist man marries a believer woman? If she believes in being submissive to her husband and sees some attractive &quot;bad boy&quot; features in his atheism? I suppose the worst combination is a bossy religious man + enlightened  liberal woman: that spells conflict.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it bad when an atheist man marries a believer woman? If she believes in being submissive to her husband and sees some attractive &#8220;bad boy&#8221; features in his atheism? I suppose the worst combination is a bossy religious man + enlightened  liberal woman: that spells conflict.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pconroy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/11/is-sorting-mysterious-to-jesse-bering/#comment-37882</link>
		<dc:creator>pconroy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 21:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=14507#comment-37882</guid>
		<description>Interesting!

I&#039;m an Atheist, which I don&#039;t mind publicly admitting, except I play it down in work situations - if my boss is very religious for instance - as sometimes people can get upset by this.

My first wife was a Polish Atheist, the second a French Atheist and the third an American Atheist. The first was raised Atheist and cryptically Catholic as a child, the second nominally Catholic as a child, the third strictly Catholic as a child, and flirted with Buddhism as a younger adult, before becoming Atheist.

As a user of dating sites, I discovered a long time ago that for optimal matching, it was better for me to exclude all religiously affiliated girls, then the remainder &quot;miraculously&quot; happened to match my interests, abilities much better... though not necessarily politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m an Atheist, which I don&#8217;t mind publicly admitting, except I play it down in work situations &#8211; if my boss is very religious for instance &#8211; as sometimes people can get upset by this.</p>
<p>My first wife was a Polish Atheist, the second a French Atheist and the third an American Atheist. The first was raised Atheist and cryptically Catholic as a child, the second nominally Catholic as a child, the third strictly Catholic as a child, and flirted with Buddhism as a younger adult, before becoming Atheist.</p>
<p>As a user of dating sites, I discovered a long time ago that for optimal matching, it was better for me to exclude all religiously affiliated girls, then the remainder &#8220;miraculously&#8221; happened to match my interests, abilities much better&#8230; though not necessarily politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirk</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/11/is-sorting-mysterious-to-jesse-bering/#comment-37881</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 21:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=14507#comment-37881</guid>
		<description>A man in Cairo is probably going to marry a woman in Cairo and both are most likely native Egyptians. Men/Women, Men/Men or Women/Women in coffee shops in Portland, Madison and Austin have a damn good chance of connecting with another Atheist (or anarchist or pagan...) much like any two snails in my garden will get together with each other and not a snail from Portugal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A man in Cairo is probably going to marry a woman in Cairo and both are most likely native Egyptians. Men/Women, Men/Men or Women/Women in coffee shops in Portland, Madison and Austin have a damn good chance of connecting with another Atheist (or anarchist or pagan&#8230;) much like any two snails in my garden will get together with each other and not a snail from Portugal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ackbark</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/11/is-sorting-mysterious-to-jesse-bering/#comment-37880</link>
		<dc:creator>ackbark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 21:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=14507#comment-37880</guid>
		<description>Have you ever read Bering in Mind? He&#039;ll take an interesting topic and milk in the most ungodly, hideous way.

Like a National Geographic article wrapped around a nugget of fact, rather than photos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you ever read Bering in Mind? He&#8217;ll take an interesting topic and milk in the most ungodly, hideous way.</p>
<p>Like a National Geographic article wrapped around a nugget of fact, rather than photos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Razib Khan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/11/is-sorting-mysterious-to-jesse-bering/#comment-37879</link>
		<dc:creator>Razib Khan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 21:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=14507#comment-37879</guid>
		<description>fixed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fixed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marcel</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/11/is-sorting-mysterious-to-jesse-bering/#comment-37878</link>
		<dc:creator>marcel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 21:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=14507#comment-37878</guid>
		<description>Your comment about the sex ratio problem looks interesting: however, clicking on it currently generates a 404 error.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your comment about the sex ratio problem looks interesting: however, clicking on it currently generates a 404 error.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
