Liberals vs. conservatives, smart vs. dull

By Razib Khan | November 26, 2011 1:57 pm

One of the things I’m interested in is the perception by some that self-identified conservatives can mobilize better as a collective unit on the American political scene. To test that proposition I often poke around the General Social Survey. For example, it seems to be a common assumption among many liberals that women tend to be more supportive of abortion rights than men. This isn’t born out by the GSS data. There’s no sex difference. Until you correct for ideology. It turns out that among liberals women are more supportive of abortion rights…while among conservatives men are more supportive of abortion rights! If people socialize only with their own ideological subset then the perception of the relationship between sex and ideological opinions will differ a great deal.

Below I decided to attempt to ascertain differences between liberals and conservatives on “hot button” issues as a function of intelligence. I used WORDSUM to probe this. I classed those who scored 0-5 as dull, those who scored 6-8 as not dull, and those who scored 9 and 10 as smart. I also limited the sample to the year 2000 and later, and only non-Hispanic whites.

I’ll give you the results without comment.


Abortion for any reason acceptable
Not Dull6527
Homosexual relations
Always wrongAlways wrong
Not Dull1570
Ban Bible prayer in schools
Not Dull6536
Allow anti-religionist to speak
Not Dull9382
Humans developed from animals
Not Dull7933
Belief in God
Atheist & agnosticAtheist & agnostic
Not Dull214
Trade took away American jobs
Not Dull3641
College educated
Not Dull4033

Comments (12)

  1. Interesting results Razib. Thanks for the analysis.

    So then a lower percentage of smart conservatives went to college as compared to smart liberals. I am guessing controlling for sex would reduce that gap somewhat. Women are more liberal and spend more time in school.

    Gotta say, atheists and agnostics are really outliers, even at higher levels of smartness. Right wing atheists and agnostics are especially outliers. I wonder what genetic variants help give us outliers a greater capacity for skepticism and rationality. My guess is we are being selected against.

  2. Dwight E. Howell

    Those you selected as being smart appear to be atheistic/progressives and support atheistic progressive causes such as the all powerful nanny state and one world government. It may also be that those who are deemed smart or not dull are also most closely tied into institutions of higher education which are dominated by people who are progressives/neosocialist and share a common set of beliefs.

    How does this match up with your own personal beliefs? From whom did you acquire those beliefs.

    I do agree with the previous poster that this group has undergone massive selection against in the past. Isn’t passing reproduction now and is apt to undergo a major contraction in the future at the hands of the followers of Allah. What is most peculiar about this is that the progressive neosocialists of the west are aiding the devote to acquire the power to terminate them.

    This is not rational but is demonstrable fact.

    I have drawn two tentative conclusions about this.

    It is interesting to note that both groups seem to want an all powerful world government. I suppose it could be that the two groups have more in common than it seems and that the biological bases of the drive for an uber state is the same.

    It may be that genes which in isolation enhance reproductive success diminish it in combination.

  3. That only 11% of both liberal and conservative smart people think that trade “took away American jobs” is I think quite telling.

  4. #2, don’t ramble so much. if you want to, you can start a blog 🙂

  5. #3, the upper classes are united in their economic class interests…to some extent….

  6. LAG

    I get the correlation you try to make to IQ, but what you’re really saying is that people who take liberal positions have greater verbal facility. I guess my response is, so what?

    And please don’t tell me you’ve proven liberals are smarter.

  7. but what you’re really saying is that people who take liberal positions have greater verbal facility.

    no. i didn’t say that. don’t put words into my mouth, or i’ll ban you (though other data do point to that).

  8. Eugenick

    What about libertarians? I predict they are be smarter than both conservatives and liberals.

  9. What about libertarians? I predict they are be smarter than both conservatives and liberals.

    Yes, and no doubt .0011% of them would agree that “trade took away American jobs” 🙂

  10. LAG

    I see you’re open to discussion. So ban me. I’ll survive. But logically your claim that you didn’t say it, just used it to underscore you thesis, is a distinction without a difference.

  11. Chris

    @10 LAG
    Don’t take it personally. Razib is confrontational with many of the responders. Many times he gets very upset over someone’s simple misunderstanding. Either he thinks it’s a personal attack on him or he just doesn’t like people with an IQ lower than his.

  12. #11, shut the fuck up. i’m usually gentle with the obviously low IQ or ignorant. my frustration is generally with the lazy or presumptuous.


Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!

Gene Expression

This blog is about evolution, genetics, genomics and their interstices. Please beware that comments are aggressively moderated. Uncivil or churlish comments will likely get you banned immediately, so make any contribution count!

About Razib Khan

I have degrees in biology and biochemistry, a passion for genetics, history, and philosophy, and shrimp is my favorite food. In relation to nationality I'm a American Northwesterner, in politics I'm a reactionary, and as for religion I have none (I'm an atheist). If you want to know more, see the links at


See More


RSS Razib’s Pinboard

Edifying books

Collapse bottom bar