<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adam&#039;s end was never in the cards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2012/02/adams-end-was-never-in-the-cards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2012/02/adams-end-was-never-in-the-cards/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 00:23:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: LLoyd S. Gordon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2012/02/adams-end-was-never-in-the-cards/#comment-40694</link>
		<dc:creator>LLoyd S. Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 01:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=15843#comment-40694</guid>
		<description>I  quite  like  the  idea  of  the  uterus  being  where  it  is  at  present.  Let  us  think  about  stabilising  our  genomic  inheritance  as  men  and  improving  the  sanitation  of  our  females  so  that  our  manhood (vajra)  can  enjoy  the  womanhood(yoni)  without  risk  of  infection.  Maybe  anal  ejection  could  be  resited  a  little  to  increase  the  separation  between  the  anus  and  the  vaginal  orifice  in  the  female (at  present  ca  3/4  inch = 0.7cm). This  would  better  help  us  as  Terrestrial  Lillium  souls  to  remain  consistent  with  Jehovan  biological  design  and  pleasure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I  quite  like  the  idea  of  the  uterus  being  where  it  is  at  present.  Let  us  think  about  stabilising  our  genomic  inheritance  as  men  and  improving  the  sanitation  of  our  females  so  that  our  manhood (vajra)  can  enjoy  the  womanhood(yoni)  without  risk  of  infection.  Maybe  anal  ejection  could  be  resited  a  little  to  increase  the  separation  between  the  anus  and  the  vaginal  orifice  in  the  female (at  present  ca  3/4  inch = 0.7cm). This  would  better  help  us  as  Terrestrial  Lillium  souls  to  remain  consistent  with  Jehovan  biological  design  and  pleasure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave chamberlin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2012/02/adams-end-was-never-in-the-cards/#comment-40693</link>
		<dc:creator>dave chamberlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 13:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=15843#comment-40693</guid>
		<description>yep, my bad</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yep, my bad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Razib Khan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2012/02/adams-end-was-never-in-the-cards/#comment-40692</link>
		<dc:creator>Razib Khan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2012 21:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=15843#comment-40692</guid>
		<description>#8, i think perhaps he meant spencer wells?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#8, i think perhaps he meant spencer wells?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2012/02/adams-end-was-never-in-the-cards/#comment-40691</link>
		<dc:creator>Katie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2012 20:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=15843#comment-40691</guid>
		<description>#7 dave,
Don&#039;t get me wrong, I&#039;m not questioning your taste in men, but have you actually seen Sykes? He is 65 and grey-haired.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#7 dave,<br />
Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I&#8217;m not questioning your taste in men, but have you actually seen Sykes? He is 65 and grey-haired.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave chamberlin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2012/02/adams-end-was-never-in-the-cards/#comment-40690</link>
		<dc:creator>dave chamberlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2012 17:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=15843#comment-40690</guid>
		<description>Brian Sykes doesn&#039;t give a rats ass about real science anymore. He took the lazy mans&#039; choice and sold out to become an infotainment salesmen. He is a good looking blond guy so he&#039;ll have plenty more money making opportunities to blather on TV and write really bad popsci books like this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian Sykes doesn&#8217;t give a rats ass about real science anymore. He took the lazy mans&#8217; choice and sold out to become an infotainment salesmen. He is a good looking blond guy so he&#8217;ll have plenty more money making opportunities to blather on TV and write really bad popsci books like this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Keesey</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2012/02/adams-end-was-never-in-the-cards/#comment-40689</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Keesey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2012 11:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=15843#comment-40689</guid>
		<description>@pconroy, hehe, O.K., that&#039;s a bit more reasonable. I&#039;m still not holding my breath, though. (Except in the airlock.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@pconroy, hehe, O.K., that&#8217;s a bit more reasonable. I&#8217;m still not holding my breath, though. (Except in the airlock.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alam</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2012/02/adams-end-was-never-in-the-cards/#comment-40688</link>
		<dc:creator>Alam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 19:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=15843#comment-40688</guid>
		<description>Before inventing artifical uterus, technologists + biologists need to find a better way of stimulating eggs growth and extracting them. Right now, the process is painful, time consuming, and expensive.

Whats the growth rate of cheap surrogacy like?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before inventing artifical uterus, technologists + biologists need to find a better way of stimulating eggs growth and extracting them. Right now, the process is painful, time consuming, and expensive.</p>
<p>Whats the growth rate of cheap surrogacy like?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maju</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2012/02/adams-end-was-never-in-the-cards/#comment-40687</link>
		<dc:creator>Maju</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 19:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=15843#comment-40687</guid>
		<description>The argumentation was that in some mammal species the Y chromosome (not males as such) has vanished and its role taken by some other chromosome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The argumentation was that in some mammal species the Y chromosome (not males as such) has vanished and its role taken by some other chromosome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pconroy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2012/02/adams-end-was-never-in-the-cards/#comment-40686</link>
		<dc:creator>pconroy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 18:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=15843#comment-40686</guid>
		<description>@mike,

Yes, and the output was, &quot;Affirmative&quot; ;)

By artificial I mean, not attached to a living female. Many organs can be kept alive for an almost indefinite amount of time via mechanical pumping of blood etc. Why not a uterus?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@mike,</p>
<p>Yes, and the output was, &#8220;Affirmative&#8221; <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>By artificial I mean, not attached to a living female. Many organs can be kept alive for an almost indefinite amount of time via mechanical pumping of blood etc. Why not a uterus?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Keesey</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2012/02/adams-end-was-never-in-the-cards/#comment-40685</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Keesey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 18:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=15843#comment-40685</guid>
		<description>How quaint, a technologist underestimating biological complexity. P. Conroy, did you run that scenario by your HAL-9000 computer? :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How quaint, a technologist underestimating biological complexity. P. Conroy, did you run that scenario by your HAL-9000 computer? <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pconroy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2012/02/adams-end-was-never-in-the-cards/#comment-40684</link>
		<dc:creator>pconroy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 17:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=15843#comment-40684</guid>
		<description>IMO, it&#039;s likely we are entering an era of ever expanding fertility treatments, which will include the &quot;Artificial Uterus&quot; or &quot;Uterus Replacement&quot; in the coming decades, and then the shoe will permanently be on the other foot?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMO, it&#8217;s likely we are entering an era of ever expanding fertility treatments, which will include the &#8220;Artificial Uterus&#8221; or &#8220;Uterus Replacement&#8221; in the coming decades, and then the shoe will permanently be on the other foot?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
