<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Loss-of-function &amp; variation in load</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2012/02/loss-of-function-variation-in-load/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2012/02/loss-of-function-variation-in-load/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 01:52:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roofus</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2012/02/loss-of-function-variation-in-load/#comment-40673</link>
		<dc:creator>Roofus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 17:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=15832#comment-40673</guid>
		<description>Do the calculations take into account the fact that the sibling rates are correlated?  The distribution of a difference of independent Poissons is a Skeelen distribution which is probably close to a normal in your example.  Siblings though should be correlated right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do the calculations take into account the fact that the sibling rates are correlated?  The distribution of a difference of independent Poissons is a Skeelen distribution which is probably close to a normal in your example.  Siblings though should be correlated right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Razib Khan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2012/02/loss-of-function-variation-in-load/#comment-40672</link>
		<dc:creator>Razib Khan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 21:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=15832#comment-40672</guid>
		<description>#1, low frequency event. my understanding is that usually in biology it *underestimates* variation. also, they might have the real distribution in their sample in the supps. didn&#039;t check.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#1, low frequency event. my understanding is that usually in biology it *underestimates* variation. also, they might have the real distribution in their sample in the supps. didn&#8217;t check.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob Roberson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2012/02/loss-of-function-variation-in-load/#comment-40671</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Roberson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 17:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=15832#comment-40671</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;poisson&lt;/i&gt;

I don&#039;t trust WP, so to verify: Poisson is used for mutations _____.

A) Usually, general case?
B) In studies like this, because they cast a wide net?
C) ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>poisson</i></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t trust WP, so to verify: Poisson is used for mutations _____.</p>
<p>A) Usually, general case?<br />
B) In studies like this, because they cast a wide net?<br />
C) ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
