<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Men on the move and women in place?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2012/02/men-on-the-move-and-women-in-place/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2012/02/men-on-the-move-and-women-in-place/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 05:52:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Onur</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2012/02/men-on-the-move-and-women-in-place/#comment-40722</link>
		<dc:creator>Onur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 01:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=15869#comment-40722</guid>
		<description>I agree with Iberian. Also, not all those haplogroup E lineages are Negro (or even African), surely not the ones commonly found in Caucasoid populations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Iberian. Also, not all those haplogroup E lineages are Negro (or even African), surely not the ones commonly found in Caucasoid populations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iberian</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2012/02/men-on-the-move-and-women-in-place/#comment-40721</link>
		<dc:creator>iberian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 23:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=15869#comment-40721</guid>
		<description>Eze,

        There is a difference between &quot;African&quot; and &quot;Negro&quot;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eze,</p>
<p>        There is a difference between &#8220;African&#8221; and &#8220;Negro&#8221;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Nydorf</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2012/02/men-on-the-move-and-women-in-place/#comment-40720</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Nydorf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 13:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=15869#comment-40720</guid>
		<description>I remember reading that parts of southwest India are matrilocal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember reading that parts of southwest India are matrilocal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eze</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2012/02/men-on-the-move-and-women-in-place/#comment-40719</link>
		<dc:creator>Eze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 08:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=15869#comment-40719</guid>
		<description>Haplogroup frequencies and autosomal affinities often do not perfectly correspond with each other. For example, Mediterranean North Africans are typically ~60% African paternally and ~20% African maternally, but most autosomal analyses put them on ~20% African instead of ~40% one would infer from uniparental markers. Similarly, Eastern Mediterraneans (Turks, Assyrians, Balkans etc) have nontrivial amounts of post-OOA African paternal lineages yet they typically show 0% African admixture in autosomal analyses. I suspect it may be hidden inside components assumed to be West Eurasian.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haplogroup frequencies and autosomal affinities often do not perfectly correspond with each other. For example, Mediterranean North Africans are typically ~60% African paternally and ~20% African maternally, but most autosomal analyses put them on ~20% African instead of ~40% one would infer from uniparental markers. Similarly, Eastern Mediterraneans (Turks, Assyrians, Balkans etc) have nontrivial amounts of post-OOA African paternal lineages yet they typically show 0% African admixture in autosomal analyses. I suspect it may be hidden inside components assumed to be West Eurasian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Claerbout</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2012/02/men-on-the-move-and-women-in-place/#comment-40718</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Claerbout</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2012 04:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=15869#comment-40718</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;they tend to coalesce first with East Asian lineages before they do so with West Eurasian lineages.&lt;/i&gt;

Curious they speak Indo-European languages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>they tend to coalesce first with East Asian lineages before they do so with West Eurasian lineages.</i></p>
<p>Curious they speak Indo-European languages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
