<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What the substrate tells</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2012/09/what-the-substrate-tells/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2012/09/what-the-substrate-tells/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 15:27:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jb</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2012/09/what-the-substrate-tells/#comment-46615</link>
		<dc:creator>jb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2012 11:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/?p=18358#comment-46615</guid>
		<description>Slightly off topic maybe, but do you have any preferred argument for why dioecy is so strongly favored over hermaphroditism in animal species? Argument explaining the existence of sex itself are fairly clear, but I&#039;ve never seen a clear argument for why there should be an advantage to having two mating types, only one of which can actually generate offspring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Slightly off topic maybe, but do you have any preferred argument for why dioecy is so strongly favored over hermaphroditism in animal species? Argument explaining the existence of sex itself are fairly clear, but I&#8217;ve never seen a clear argument for why there should be an advantage to having two mating types, only one of which can actually generate offspring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
