Toxic Green Slime: Coming to a Lake or Beach Near You?

By Tom Yulsman | April 2, 2013 6:15 pm

A record-breaking bloom of algae in Lake Erie in October, 2011 is seen in this Landsat-5 satellite image. The green scum is mostly Microcystis, which produces a liver toxin and can cause skin irritation. (Image: NASA)

Yesterday, you may have read a news story here at Discover about the results of a study into the causes of Lake Erie’s record-breaking 2011 algae bloom, and how climate change could make events like these more common.

Today, I thought I would advance the story by fleshing out some of the broader context.

“Several feet deep of green gunk on your shoreline certainly doesn’t do wonders for property values or your ability to enjoy the lakeshore,” says Anna Michalak, a researcher at the Carnegie Institution and the lead author of the study, published Monday in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. But she and other researchers agree that there are more reasons than that to care about the gunk: It can be toxic, and it is an increasing global problem.

Blooms can occur when nitrogen and phosphorous from fertilizers run off into lakes, estuaries and other waters. (Phosphorous is more of a problem in lakes; nitrogen in coastal environments.) Michalak and her research team documented what she called “a perfect storm of weather events and agricultural practices” that triggered Lake Erie’s biggest bloom ever. And also how climate change could make such events more frequent. For the details, I encourage you to see Breanna Draxler’s story from yesterday.

As Michalak and her colleagues pointed out in their paper, this kind of problem is increasing all around the world. Much of the world’s population, and agricultural production, is concentrated near the coasts, she points out. “And as more and more land is used more intensely for agriculture, we’re seeing an increased issue with nutrient loading into coastal systems.”

Alan Townsend, an expert in biogeochemistry and ecosystem ecology at the University of Colorado, Boulder (and a colleague of mine here), concurs. “In recent decades, algal blooms have been increasing in severity and frequency in many parts of the world — and not just the U.S. and Europe,” he says. In an email to me, he continued:

China is a big one, with some nasty documented cases and undoubtedly many more that have not hit the global radar. Toxic blooms have also occurred in several parts of Latin America, perhaps most notably Brazil.  Some of these have resulted in people dying.  Canada has also had problems — e.g Lake Winnipeg, among others.

When big blooms of algae die, they sink, and the organisms that decompose them use up oxygen in the water. The process is known as “eutrophication,” and the plunge in oxygen levels is called “hypoxia.”

“This is harmful to fisheries and other aquatic life,” Michalak notes. But algae blooms also can have a direct economic impact. For example, during the massive 2011 bloom in Lake Erie, the city of Toledo, which draws drinking water from the lake, had to spend several thousand dollars extra each day to treat it.

A bloom of Microcystis algae in Lake Ontario. (Image: NOAA)

“These blooms in particular are hazardous, because they involve a specific cyanobacteria called Microcystis that releases a compound that is toxic to the liver,” she says. Another species releases a neurotoxin.

“With the mess made within Lake Erie, we may have been 100 to a thousand-fold above international standards for these toxins,” she says. Thus the need for more expensive water treatment efforts during the bloom.

Michalak cautions against simply looking for villains. Fertilizer has become essential in feeding a growing global population. And, in fact, her research revealed that reduced-tillage agriculture, introduced to lower the amount of climate-altering carbon that is emitted from the soils of agricultural fields into the atmosphere, has had the unintended consequence of increasing the runoff of nutrients into Lake Erie.

“Sometimes the things we do for the best possible reasons turn out to have negative consequences,” she notes.

Another contributing factor has been the big push to grow corn — a fertilizer-intensive crop — to make ethanol for supplementing gasoline.

But this is not one of those environmental problems that should cause us to despair. As Alan Townsend points out, it is not at all intractable:

Many of our modern agricultural systems are far from optimized in terms of maximizing the food gain from fertilizers while minimizing the loss to the environment.  Doing better here would actually increase food security, save money, and lessen growing environmental and economic risks posed by nitrogen and phosphorous pollution.  And we can do better — much of this is not a matter of pie-in-the-sky inventions of the future.  With proper will and policies in place, most of the world’s major breadbaskets could greatly improve their N and P use efficiency in ways that would be win-win scenarios, at least in the longer run.


  • JonFrum

    In other words, this had nothing to do with climate change. Except that the expert says that concern for climate change may have actually helped CAUSE it.

    • Tom Yulsman

      If you’re interested, read the study. But here’s a summary:

      The researchers found that extreme precipitation events — of the kind associated with climate change — contributed to the bloom. They also did modeling to investigate whether such events might become more common in the region as climate change continues. The model simulations came up with an increase in frequency of 50%. And the very biggest extreme precipitation events increase by 100% in the simulations.

      Lastly, the researchers documented how weak lake circulation and quiescent conditions contributed to the bloom. As they noted, there has been a trend “of decreasing wind speeds over the continental United States and elsewhere, suggesting that the long residence times and quiescent conditions observed in 2011 may not be uncommon in the future. A continuing trend toward lower wind speeds would contribute to the severity of blooms, both through increasing residence times and decreased mixing in the water column.”

      • JonFrum

        Peer reviewed science does not support any attribution of ‘extreme’ weather events today and anthropogenic climate change. Stream gauges across the Untied States show no such increase in precipitation.

        And now you’re telling me that climate change causes LESS wind? Please. More rain, climate change. Less rain, climate change. More snow, climate change. Less snow, climate change. Have you ever encountered the concept of falsifiability? There is no heads-I-win-tails-you-lose in science.

        The greater point is that there is a problem right now – and a known cause, right now. Fertilizer runoff explains the bloom, and there’s no reason for flights of speculative modeling fancy. If a body is found with a gunshot wound in the chest, there is no need to look for Amazonian poison frog toxin in the body. There is a problem here – fertilizer runoff – that is the story. The climate change aspect is just a way to sex up the study.



ImaGeo is a visual blog focusing on the intersection of imagery, imagination and Earth. It focuses on spectacular visuals related to the science of our planet, with an emphasis (although not an exclusive one) on the unfolding Anthropocene Epoch.

About Tom Yulsman

Tom Yulsman is Director of the Center for Environmental Journalism and a Professor of Journalism at the University of Colorado, Boulder. He also continues to work as a science and environmental journalist with more than 30 years of experience producing content for major publications. His work has appeared in the New York Times, Washington Post, Audubon, Climate Central, Columbia Journalism Review, Discover, Nieman Reports, and many other publications. He has held a variety of editorial positions over the years, including a stint as editor-in-chief of Earth magazine. Yulsman has written one book: Origins: the Quest for Our Cosmic Roots, published by the Institute of Physics in 2003.


See More


Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!

Collapse bottom bar