El Ni単o? Nope. La Ni単a? Uh uh. La NADA!

By Tom Yulsman | September 11, 2013 1:07 pm

Sea surface heights as seen by NASA’s Jason-2 satellite. Green tones indicate areas where sea level is near-normal. (Image: NASA-JPL/Caltech/Ocean Surface Topography Team)

The image above from NASA’s Jason-2 satellite shows that sea level in the equatorial Pacific Ocean is close to normal.

But before you breathe a sigh of relief about the coming winter in the Northern Hemisphere, or summer down under for that matter, read on…

In the image, green tones show sea level that’s about normal, blues and magentas where it is below normal, and reds and yellows the opposite. These colors are also indicative of the temperature of the ocean water. That’s because warmer water expands and thereby leads to higher sea level, whereas the opposite is true of cooler water.

Normal sea level in the equatorial Pacific is characteristic of neutral climatic conditions neither an El Ni単o, which raises sea level in the area, nor a La Ni単a, which lowers it. Instead, it’s called “La Nada.”

It has lasted now for 16 months, and will probably persist at least through the Northern Hemisphere winter, according to the latest update from NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center. (Probabilistic forecasting suggests it could even continue through June.)

El Ni単o andLa Ni単a can bring their share of disruptive and even destructive weather events. For example,El Ni単o can bring destructive flooding to the southern tier of the United States, and devastating drought and brushfires to Australia, according to NOAA.

Meanwhile La Ni単a can bring wetter than normal conditions to Australia and was, in fact, a significant contributing factor to destructive heavy rainfall in southeastern Australia between October 2011 and March 2012.La Ni単a was also a significant factorlast year in one of the worst droughts on record in the United States.

So La Nada by definition, the absence of the climatic conditions typically associated with this kind of mayhem may well sound like good news. But it is actually a bit frustrating to climate forecasters, and it is by no means a reprieve from meteorological nastiness.

Consider these comments from Bill Patzert of NASAs Jet Propulsion Laboratory, (quoted in a NASA news release):

Without an El Ni単o or La Ni単a signal present, other, less predictable, climatic factors will govern fall, winter and spring weather conditions . . . Long-range forecasts are most successful during El Ni単o and La Ni単a episodes.The ‘inbetween’ ocean state, La Nada, is the dominant condition, and is frustrating for long-range forecasters. Its like driving withouta decent road map — it makes forecasting difficult.

In other words, withoutEl Ni単o or La Ni単a in the driver’s seat, we’ll be even more in the dark about what may be coming at us this winter and spring.

Also, consider this, again from Patzert:

Neutral infers something benign, but in fact if you look at these La Nada years when neither El Ni単o nor La Ni単a are present, they can be the most volatile and punishing. As an example, the continuing, deepening drought in the American West is far from neutral.

Given all of that, I’m a little at a loss to say what the bottom line here is. But since all of it El Ni単o, La Ni単aand La Nada can be be bad news, I guess the bottom line is simply this: Weather happens.

  • disqus_atlq8Zmtsd

    Weather happens. About as accurate an analysis as I could hope for.

    All three conditions are “normal,” and all three lead to different weather locally but mostly the same weather if you look at it on a global scale. If it is normal to cycle between them, then it almost doesn’t make sense to define normal except in the context of what the the length and severity of the cycle normally is.

    Now that the cycle has swung back to the middle, I actually have to wonder if temperature data could actually be a little bit more useful for analysis with respect to the long term because there is no short term bias. Of course, if there is too much noise in the historical data or a short term La Nada doesn’t really manifest itself in terms of the global scale (as opposed to the local) because of dampening factors, then certainly it is just one more year to add to the noise and look for a trend.



ImaGeo is a visual blog focusing on the intersection of imagery, imagination and Earth. It focuses on spectacular visuals related to the science of our planet, with an emphasis (although not an exclusive one) on the unfolding Anthropocene Epoch.

About Tom Yulsman

Tom Yulsman is Director of the Center for Environmental Journalism and a Professor of Journalism at the University of Colorado, Boulder. He also continues to work as a science and environmental journalist with more than 30 years of experience producing content for major publications. His work has appeared in the New York Times, Washington Post, Audubon, Climate Central, Columbia Journalism Review, Discover, Nieman Reports, and many other publications. He has held a variety of editorial positions over the years, including a stint as editor-in-chief of Earth magazine. Yulsman has written one book: Origins: the Quest for Our Cosmic Roots, published by the Institute of Physics in 2003.


See More


Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!

Collapse bottom bar