Here’s what Cassini heard as it made its daring dive between Saturn and its rings

By Tom Yulsman | May 2, 2017 10:57 am

A Simon and Garfunkel song comes to mind—and that has scientists scratching their heads as the spacecraft heads today for a second dive.

In this illustration, the Cassini spacecraft is shown diving between Saturn and the planet's innermost ring. (Source: NASA/JPL-Caltech)

In this illustration, the Cassini spacecraft is shown diving between Saturn and the planet’s innermost ring. (Source: NASA/JPL-Caltech)

As the Cassini spacecraft swooped between Saturn and its innermost ring on April 26th, one of its instruments listened for the sounds of its passage through the heretofore unexplored region. What it heard was of great interest to engineers planning for the second dive, as well as to scientists who study Saturn’s rings.

The engineers were hoping to hear the sound of silence, specifically nothing indicative of lots of dust hitting the spacecraft. If the gaps between Saturn and its rings turned out to be very dusty, on future dives — including the next one, scheduled for today, May 2nd — the spacecraft would once again have to use its 13-foot-wide antenna to shield its delicate instruments.

The ring scientists, though, were expecting to hear the sound of lots of particles hitting the spacecraft — because they thought this gap would be fairly dusty.

As it turned out, the engineers came away delighted, and the scientists puzzled.

“The region between the rings and Saturn is ‘the big empty,’ apparently,” said Cassini Project Manager Earl Maize of NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, quoted in a press release. “Cassini will stay the course, while the scientists work on the mystery of why the dust level is much lower than expected.”

Let’s listen to what the spacecraft heard:

This video presents data collected by the Radio and Plasma Wave Science instrument, or RPWS, on NASA’s Cassini spacecraft. RPWS tunes in, so to speak, to radio waves, as well as plasma waves, around Saturn. In the sound accompanying the video, the whistles and squeaks you hear come from waves in the charged particle environment.

These data provide scientists with valuable information beyond what Cassini’s imaging instruments offer. As NASA puts it:

By studying radio and plasma waves around Saturn, scientists can better understand Saturn’s relationship with its moons and rings, as well as how the planet interacts with the solar wind. For example, Saturn’s auroras emit radio waves in approximately the same frequency range as AM radio stations on Earth.

But the instrument also can hear any dust that’s hitting it. Not quite like a microphone on a recorder, though. Instead, data on particle strikes are converted to an audio format, producing pops and cracks.

In the audio track above, there is virtually no detectable peak in pops and cracks from dust particles striking the spacecraft as it shoots through the gap, labeled as “Ring Plane Crossing.”

“It was a bit disorienting — we weren’t hearing what we expected to hear,” said William Kurth, RPWS team lead at the University of Iowa, quoted in the NASA press release. “I’ve listened to our data from the first dive several times and I can probably count on my hands the number of dust particle impacts I hear.”

In stark contrast, here’s what it sounded like when Cassini passed through a faint, dusty ring on Dec. 18, 2016:

That peak in pops and cracks toward the middle is the sound of a very dusty environment. And it is obviously very different from what Cassini heard as it shot through the gap on April 26th.

That dive, and the second one scheduled for today, are part of Cassini’s ‘Grand Finale.’ This final chapter in Cassini’s epic journey will include 22 dives between the rings and the planet. It will all culminate on September 15, 2017, when Cassini is scheduled to dive into Saturn’s atmosphere, putting an end to the mission.

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Christopher Johnson

    Great article. It’s nice to know imageo can still write science articles and not always political silliness. Thank you.

    • Tray Brogdon

      agree 100%

    • Jennifer Cullen

      What a strange comment. It is science denial that is is political silliness. A report on science is just that- science- even if it is about an unpleasant reality you’ve made a choice not to accept. Facts aren’t political.

  • Lord

    Any word what the beeping is before the crossing?

    • http://secure93.com Erik Gibson

      I discontinue working at shopritte and nowadays I’m getting $75-97$ every hour. How? I am working on-line! My work didn’t make me happy hence I made the decision to take a chance on something new…after four years it wasn’t easy to quit my day job however right now I couldn’t be happier.>>> SHRTY.LINK/sWPGJq

  • Debjyoti Banerjee

    Seems like recorded from a radio while searching for a station… 😂

  • cv

    Morse code….

  • Leah Kleine

    December and April.. I may be wrong but wouldn’t that account for some sort of difference? Maybe it’s more turbulent in December rather than in April?? I feel like I’d be more surprised if there was such a difference if they’d crossed December 2016 then compared it to a crossing in December of 2017. I just feel like it’s sort of an avoidable confounding variable… maybe it’s not important but maybe it is. 🤷🏻‍♀️

NEW ON DISCOVER
OPEN
CITIZEN SCIENCE
ADVERTISEMENT

ImaGeo

ImaGeo is a visual blog focusing on the intersection of imagery, imagination and Earth. It focuses on spectacular visuals related to the science of our planet, with an emphasis (although not an exclusive one) on the unfolding Anthropocene Epoch.

About Tom Yulsman

Tom Yulsman is Director of the Center for Environmental Journalism and a Professor of Journalism at the University of Colorado, Boulder. He also continues to work as a science and environmental journalist with more than 30 years of experience producing content for major publications. His work has appeared in the New York Times, Washington Post, Audubon, Climate Central, Columbia Journalism Review, Discover, Nieman Reports, and many other publications. He has held a variety of editorial positions over the years, including a stint as editor-in-chief of Earth magazine. Yulsman has written one book: Origins: the Quest for Our Cosmic Roots, published by the Institute of Physics in 2003.

ADVERTISEMENT

See More

ADVERTISEMENT

Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!

Collapse bottom bar
+