A shark-shaped, climate-shifting blob of warm water — as wide as the Pacific Ocean — is rising from the depths

By Tom Yulsman | April 19, 2018 12:40 am

The ‘shark’ will soon gobble up La Niña’s cool surface waters. What might this mean for the climate later this year?

A blob of water shaped like a shark is rising in the Pacific

A cross section of the equatorial Pacific Ocean showing how water temperature departed from average during the five-day period centered on 3 April 2018. The vertical axis shows depth below the surface. The horizontal axis is longitude, from the western to eastern tropical Pacific. (Source: ENSO Blog/Climate.gov from CPC data)

It’s not every day that you see an animated graphic like the one above hosted on the website of an ordinarily staid U.S. government agency.

And yes, that is indeed an illustration comparing a complex Earth system phenomenon to, well, a shark.

The comparison comes from the fabulous folks at the ENSO Blog, published under the aegis of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (but technically not an official communication from NOAA). The ENSO bloggers focus with unusual clarity — and good humor — on El Niño, La Niña, and their impacts.

So, back to the shark. It’s actually a gargantuan blob of warm water as wide as the Pacific. And it is rising relentlessly from the depths along the Equator.

Here’s why you should care: That shark may actually influence the weather you will experience a few months down the road, not to mention just how much warmer than average our planet will be for the remainder of the year, and moving into 2019 as well.

The graphic represents a cross section of the Pacific Ocean along the equator. It shows how water temperatures departed from average in late March and early April, from the surface down to 300 meters (nearly a thousand feet), and from one side of the Pacific to the other.

Those blue colors you can see near the surface, and particularly concentrated in the eastern Pacific, are a hallmark of La Niña. In fact, we’ve officially been in the midst of a cooling La Niña episode since November of last year.

This climatic phenomenon is characterized by a number of things, most especially that cooling of the surface waters along the equator in a large portion of the Pacific Ocean. This, in turn, is associated with influences on rainfall patterns and, much farther afield, with a shift in the mid-latitude jet stream across North America. As described by a post at the ENSO blog back in September:

During La Niña, the Pacific jet stream often meanders high into the North Pacific and and is less reliable across the southern tier of the United States. Southern and interior Alaska and the Pacific Northwest tend to be cooler and wetter than average, and the southern tier of U.S. states—from California to the Carolinas—tends to be warmer and drier than average.  Farther north, the Ohio and Upper Mississippi River Valleys may be wetter than usual. During El Niño, these deviations from the average are approximately (but not exactly) reversed.

The climate system is a very complex beast, so things don’t always turn out exactly as the averages suggest. This winter was no exception. To offer one conspicuous example, interior Alaska has been much warmer than average lately.

Be that as it may, La Niña unquestionably is one of the major climatic influences on the weather we experience. And now, it is fading. Neutral conditions are forecast to arrive within the next couple of months. If the forecast turns out to be accurate, those conditions will be heralded by temperatures in the central Pacific Ocean returning to near the long-term average.

Cue the gargantuan shark.

Last summer, the subsurface waters of the Pacific along the equator were running cooler-than-average down to about 300 meters. Thank you, La Niña.

But in November, they began to warm up. And by last March, those waters were, on average, the warmest they’d been since February 2016. That was during the last warming El Niño episode — which was a real humdinger.

And this warmer-than-average blob — which just happens to be sort-of-kind-of in the shape of a shark — has been slowly moving to the east under the surface. Just so you know, scientists call this a “downwelling Kelvin wave.” (I don’t know about you, but I think “shark” seems a lot more compelling…)

In the next few months, forecasters predict that the shark will surfaces, and when it does, “it’ll swallow the remaining cooler surface waters,” writes NOAA’s Emily Becker at the ENSO Blog.

And that will mean: La Niña, RIP. This could help nudge up global temperatures, which in recent months have actually been running just off the record warming pace of the past two years.

SEE ALSO: Earth’s climate went kind of schizo in March

Forecasting what will happen next is difficult at this time of year. Keep that caveat in mind when I run this forecast by you: There is a 45 percent chance of a warming El Niño episode taking hold during October through December. That’s compared to a 35 percent of it happening randomly, according to Becker.

Like La Niña, El Niño can have a really big impact on weather in far-flung parts of the world. It also tends to boost global average temperatures, which are already rising over the long run thanks to our emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases.

As always, stay tuned!

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Eatit

    It’s megalodon!!! He’s real!!!

  • Agustin Jr Chavez

    Does this Shark-shaped blob of warm water anomaly mean the return of El Nino?

    • Erik Bosma

      That’s what they said.

      • Agustin Jr Chavez

        I’ve never seen an anomaly that big, when was the last time we saw something like this?

        • TLongmire

          There was a giant “blob” of cold water in September 17 and another giant “blob” of warm water February of this year. Sensationalism is all. https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/057c8309931425990516f21d3972f37a7b287e3415b28cbe2ad1f63fed31b641.png

          • Charles Barnard

            Yes, and that September blob may well have accounted for much of our winter odd weather.

            Not just sensationalism, reality,

            For any of these events, there is a probability that they will and a probability that they won’t have the predicted effect.

            If the probability goes from 34 to 45 percent, and nothing happens, that doesn’t make the prediction wrong nor sensationalist. The odds were always against it, they just were better than usual.

            Even if an event has a 99% chance of happening, the prediction isn’t “wrong” if it doesn’t come through. Odds are seldom 100% which is part of the reason no human activity is completely safe…

          • Tom Yulsman

            Mr. TLongmire: I just like to have fun. But evidently, you’re just a boring party pooper. So why don’t you head somewhere else, to a blog that will make you happy with drab, boring writing. And given that you also seem to see everything — including a post about an Earth systems phenomenon that affects our weather — through the lens of hyper-partisan politics, you might make sure that it conforms to your pre-conceived notions, lest you be challenged to reassess how you think about things.

          • TLongmire

            I answered his question is all, and he read your post at face value and was surprised by the “anomaly” when it is a common yet little known phenomenon. The fact you would say that about my “lens” is proof of your own projection. I prefer to see this world thru my own “lens”.

          • Agustin Jr Chavez

            If this happens, since I live in Los Angeles California. We could be in for an Extremely active storm season for the 2018-19 storm season.

  • Walter Goddard

    I wonder if it’s a trapped heat bubble from the underwater volcanoes? Along with the currents, it’s finally moving out from underneath heavier cold water above it..

    When it does surface, I would expect it to cause some water spouts and rain to form.. Should help with drought stricken areas..

NEW ON DISCOVER
OPEN
CITIZEN SCIENCE
ADVERTISEMENT

ImaGeo

ImaGeo is a visual blog focusing on the intersection of imagery, imagination and Earth. It focuses on spectacular visuals related to the science of our planet, with an emphasis (although not an exclusive one) on the unfolding Anthropocene Epoch.

About Tom Yulsman

Tom Yulsman is Director of the Center for Environmental Journalism and a Professor of Journalism at the University of Colorado, Boulder. He also continues to work as a science and environmental journalist with more than 30 years of experience producing content for major publications. His work has appeared in the New York Times, Washington Post, Audubon, Climate Central, Columbia Journalism Review, Discover, Nieman Reports, and many other publications. He has held a variety of editorial positions over the years, including a stint as editor-in-chief of Earth magazine. Yulsman has written one book: Origins: the Quest for Our Cosmic Roots, published by the Institute of Physics in 2003.

ADVERTISEMENT

See More

ADVERTISEMENT

Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!

Collapse bottom bar
+