Objects Bring Fear the Closer They Appear

By Elizabeth Preston | June 27, 2014 7:46 am

shark truck

Quick: which of these things should you worry about if it’s coming toward you?

a.) grizzly bear

b.) pedestrian

c.) frowny face emoticon

You many not have time to assess all the risks (is the bear running? does the frowny face have greater-than-symbol eyebrows?). But without thinking about it, you’ll have a bad feeling about all of them. We have negative reactions to anything moving toward us, according to a recent study, no matter how harmless it really is.

Behavioral scientists at the University of Chicago’s Booth School of Business, along with colleagues at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, asked whether we feel differently about things that are moving toward us or away from us (or staying still). Previous research had shown that whether an object is near or far can affect our emotional response to it. So it makes sense that whether something’s moving from one distance to another might matter too.

The researchers started not with a grizzly bear or even an approaching stranger, but with letters. As in “of the alphabet.” They  used 32 letters from the English alphabet in a variety of fonts—they’d started with more letters, but narrowed the group down to those ranked by viewers as the most neutral. Then they showed a group of subjects, recruited via Amazon Mechanical Turk, videos in which the letters appeared to be moving toward them (growing larger on the screen), moving away (growing smaller), or stationary.

After each video, subjects rated their feelings about that letter on a 7-point scale from “very negative” to “very positive.” As silly as they may have felt passing judgment on a consonant or vowel, the results weren’t random: letters moving closer to the subjects were rated more negatively than those moving away or staying still.

Letters weren’t the end of the story. The researchers next repeated the experiment with emoticons (“i.e. a face icon with two dots representing the eyes and a line representing the mouth”). Whether subjects saw a smiley face, a frowny face, or a neutral one, they felt more negatively about faces that were coming toward them.

Most of us aren’t approached in the street by floating punctuation marks, so the researchers moved on to a more realistic scenario: videos of a person walking toward the subject, walking away, or staying still. Again, the approaching person was rated the most negatively. Another version of the experiment used sound. Whether subjects heard the noise of footsteps or a recorded musical instrument, they felt better about sounds that were staying the same or growing fainter. Sounds growing louder, as if they were getting closer, elicited worse feelings.

Then the experiments moved on to physical objects. Subjects stood at one end of a long hallway; at the other end was a wheeled cart holding a large poster for a Chinese opera. A hidden researcher wheeled the cart nearer or farther away while subjects periodically rated their feelings. As the poster rolled closer to them, subjects rated it more and more negatively (even though they’d been promised it would stop before hitting them in the face). Yet if the poster receded or stayed put, subjects’ rating stayed the same over time—or even improved.

No matter what stimulus researchers had used, people felt more negatively about things moving toward them. The researchers dubbed the phenomenon “approach aversion.” It’s easy to see why a threatening animal or stranger might make us nervous when it approaches. But it’s harder to understand why we feel the same way—at least, when we’re forced to describe our feelings—about clearly harmless images or inanimate objects.

The researchers think it might be a case of overgeneralization. That is, a feeling that’s useful in some scenarios bleeds over into anytime we need to make a quick judgment. We also may feel more powerless and less in control when something is moving toward us.

None of this is useful for avoiding bears, but it might provide helpful information about interacting with other people. When we’re giving presentations or lectures, moving toward the audience might hurt how we’re perceived. In advertising, products that come flying toward the viewer onscreen might be a harder sell. And charging up to a stranger at a party may not be the best way to make a good impression. Even if your face is smiley.


Image: by zharth (via Flickr)

Hsee, C., Tu, Y., Lu, Z., & Ruan, B. (2014). Approach aversion: Negative hedonic reactions toward approaching stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106 (5), 699-712 DOI: 10.1037/a0036332

CATEGORIZED UNDER: brains, quiz, sound, top posts, whether to panic
MORE ABOUT: Emotions, Psychology, Senses
  • http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz4.htm Uncle Al

    We have negative reactions to anything moving toward us” You have not met my woman, nor will you. Mine, all mine. “There was a girl who had a curl right in the center of her forehead. When she was good she was very good, and when she was bad she was better.”

    They used 32 letters from the English alphabet in a variety of fonts“: Must be one of them no child left behind diversity social promotion alphabets. My Merriam-Webster lists 26 letters in the English alphabet. Perhaps it was the UK alphabet, or some IPA voiced coronal lateral fricatives. The latter would make any reasonably aware person uncomfortable.

    • FeatheredFiend

      Or maybe they repeated some letters, and it was a confusingly phrased sentence.

      • epreston8

        Letters were repeated in various fonts. They started with over 100 and narrowed down the set.

    • Linda Long

      I assumed it meant upper and lower case letters.

  • Adam Glenville

    I find this amazing. The fact that our perception of an object can determine our feelings towards it. What fascinates me is how can an object produce negative feelings toward someone, based solely off location and perception? I would like to think some of it has to do with the vision of the person seeing whatever is coming towards him or her. After seeing the object coming towards them, I would assume that after the sight of the object goes to the retina and through the optic nerve, it reaches the midbrain and sends a signal to the rest of the body. Perhaps because human vision can be skewed and their eyes can play tricks on them, the eyes lack visual consistency and we think the object is getting larger, therefore becoming a threat to us.

NEW ON DISCOVER
OPEN
CITIZEN SCIENCE
ADVERTISEMENT

Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!

Inkfish

Like the wily and many-armed cephalopod, Inkfish reaches into the far corners of science news and brings you back surprises (and the occasional sea creature). The ink is virtual but the research is real.

About Elizabeth Preston

Elizabeth Preston is a science writer whose articles have appeared in publications including Slate, Nautilus, and National Geographic. She's also Editor of the children's science magazine Muse, where she frequently writes in the voice of a know-it-all bovine. She lives in Massachusetts. Read more and see her other writing here.

ADVERTISEMENT

See More

@Inkfish on Twitter

ADVERTISEMENT
Collapse bottom bar
+

Login to your Account

X
E-mail address:
Password:
Remember me
Forgot your password?
No problem. Click here to have it e-mailed to you.

Not Registered Yet?

Register now for FREE. Registration only takes a few minutes to complete. Register now »