Wind Turbines Kill Bats by Impersonating Trees

By Elizabeth Preston | September 29, 2014 2:04 pm

wind farm

Survival tip: don’t hang around machines that have giant spinning blades. It’s a lesson bats have been slow to learn, judging by the large numbers of their corpses found beneath wind turbines. New video footage suggests some bats are attracted to wind farms because they can’t tell turbines apart from trees. If it’s true, this might help us find ways to keep them safer.

“I wish we knew for sure” how big a problem wind farms pose to bats, says USGS research biologist Paul Cryan. Other researchers have estimated that tens of thousands—or even hundreds of thousands—of bats are killed every year by wind turbines in the U.S. and Canada.

Without a good idea of the population sizes of these bats, it’s hard to put those numbers in perspective. But we do know that bats have long lives and reproduce slowly, which makes them vulnerable. “Bat populations do not respond quickly to rapid losses,” Cryan says. And some species of bats seem to die at turbines more often than others, so the danger may not be evenly spread out. The safest solution, Cryan says, is to find ways of stopping bat deaths as soon as possible: “We might have the luxury of time and we might not.”

The bats that seem most likely to die in wind farm run-ins are “tree bats,” species that roost in trees rather than caves. To find out how these bats are getting themselves killed, Cryan and his coauthors monitored turbines at an Indiana wind facility for three months in the summer and fall. They used thermal surveillance cameras and infrared video to spot bats in the dark. Acoustic detectors listened for bat calls, while radar swept the area to find out how many animals of all kinds were passing through.

The area around and above the turbines was heavily trafficked—radar detected a few million animals in all, including birds and insects. The video cameras captured footage of just under a thousand bats. Researchers scrutinized this video evidence for clues in the bats’ behavior about why wind turbines were killing them.

They saw that bats didn’t try to avoid the turbines, and in fact seemed drawn to them. While radar picked up lots of birds in the area, the birds rarely came near the turbines. But bats closely approached the turbine poles, nacelles, and even the blades themselves. They dove and swooped around the turbines and chased each other through them. Some would spend several minutes approaching and re-approaching a turbine, as if they couldn’t stay away.

Most of the species seemed to be tree bats (based on their calls, as well as the handful of dead bats researchers found below the turbines). These bats were more likely to approach the turbines on some nights than on others. When the moon was visible and more than half full, there was more bat activity—maybe something about the light reflecting off the blades attracted their attention. Wind was important too: bats were most active when there was a gentle wind, and they tended to stay on the downwind side of the turbines.

All this evidence suggests that certain bats are attracted to wind turbines because they resemble trees. They look vaguely like trees, for one thing, with a trunk-like pole and branch-ish blades. In addition, bats can likely sense air currents. The air flow downwind of a turbine may feel to them like the currents on the sheltered sides of cliffs or trees—places where bats gather in nature. They may like hanging out in these spots because there’s extra prey (insects get blown downwind) and fewer predators, and flying is easier.

If tree bats can’t tell turbines apart from trees, they may swoop and gather around them, as the videos showed, because they’re looking for prey. They may also be seeking mates, or just a place to roost for the night. The bats can find some of what they’re looking for at wind farms—the authors note that bats sometimes turn up dead beneath turbines with their stomachs full of bugs. But they won’t have much luck trying to roost in a metal nacelle.

These findings aren’t universal, Cryan stresses. The group only studied a few turbines at one Indiana facility. But they do provide hints about how wind farms might stop offing so many bats.

For one thing, bats in the study were less attracted to turbines when the wind was blowing hard. This may be because the turbulent air currents from fast-moving blades didn’t feel as familiar. Cryan says some wind facilities are already raising their “cut-in” speed—the wind speed at which blades start turning—to try and kill fewer bats. If turbines could also avoid turning on suddenly in strong gusts of wind, they might avoid killing bats that had been hanging around and enjoying the earlier breeze.

There are also ways to scare off bats using loud noises or other stimuli, Cryan says. If wind farms targeted these efforts at the space downwind of the turbines, they might have more success.

“We hope that our work inspires others to look into this mystery, gather evidence, and see if science can triumph,” Cryan says. So far the wind turbines have been triumphing over the bats, but that doesn’t have to be the end of the story.

Image: by SCA Svenska Cellulosa Aktiebolaget (via Flickr)

Paul. M. Cryan, P. Marcos Gorresen, Cris D. Hein, Michael R. Schirmacher, Robert H. Diehl, Manuela M. Huso, David T. S. Hayman, Paul D. Fricker, Frank J. Bonaccorso, Douglas H. Johnson, Kevin Heist, & David C. Dalton (2014). Behavior of bats at wind turbines PNAS : 10.1073/pnas.1406672111

  • rj

    Nice. Make fun of and Blame the bats to ward off any public outcry.

  • Mike Turn

    So, it seems that green energy could lead to the extinction of the tree bat. But, of course the environmentalists are nowhere to be found when green energy kills (like birds, bats, etc.), but swarm all over a snail or moss that could be affected by oil drilling activities.

    • Finkin79 .

      Same way the solar farms are killing migrating birds. Not a peep from the greenie crowd about all the death they’re causing. Considering how many of these “renewable/green” energy systems aren’t nearly as renewable or green as they’d like us to think… Well, at least we now know that greenies don’t actually care about the environment.

    • Peter Simmons

      It’s a big lie, been around for decades, this ‘writer’ fell for it from ignorance, just like you.

      • TimesRNowBetter

        So these wind farms kill no birds or bats or anything at all? Not one? They are the perfect machines that do no damage to anything or anyone at all?
        That’s the big lie. And you fell for that from ignorance or stupidity or just wanting unicorns and rainbows to rule the world. Hahahahaha.
        Thanks for the good joke.

  • Nom de Plume

    Interesting, but as the article says, there aren’t good numbers on bat population. So we don’t know what percentage is affected, or whether the proportion of bat species killed at wind turbine sites is matches those of the general population. Are more tree roosting bats killed at turbine sites because they mistake the generators for trees, or because there happens to be a larger proportion of tree roosting species among bats in the area? If it matches, could it be that they are simply chasing the bugs?

    If turbines end up having to idle until the wind is faster in order to save bats, that’s going to further cut the operating range.

    • Pingston

      Wind turbines are a disaster from every perspective. Need subsidies. Kill birds and bats. And not just operating ones — there are 14,000 abandoned wind turbines in US that are spinning and killing. In Canada (Wolfe Island, in St. Lawrence River) the owners reduced collection from daily to change carcass data. These killing machines are right where migrating robins, sparrows, geese, red-winged blackbirds, cardinals, etc. head south — and are slaughtered by the 100s of thousands.

      • Nom de Plume

        Maybe. Not to sound cold, but bird and bats are killed by transformers and power lines all the time, not to mention the classic birds flying into windows. The question is whether it’s in significant numbers, and to know that we’d have to have some idea of species population.

        • Peter Simmons

          Millions are known to fly into windows just in the UK alone. A few birds striking wind turbines [or electricity pylons, electricity cables, large buildings, all kinds of industrial infrastructure] is disater for the birds but not an issue except to those opposed to wind turbines. Usually the same morons opposed to believbing in climate change even when up to their necks in flood water.

    • Peter Simmons

      There aren’t ‘good numbers’ because it’s all lies and they can’t create statistics from nothing. I have lots of turbines near me in North Norfolk UK, when visiting I have never seen a dead bat or bird, never. Thjere are plenty of explanations why this is nonsense, not least the sheer ability of bats to navigate with tools we barely understand. Birds too are clever and can land on a dot, chase each other in fun and anger only inches apart and have incredibly sharp reflexes. Apart from a very occasional hit, perhaps a sick bird not paying attention, this is a non-issue, Unlike the known millions of birds who do die flying into windows. Rather than looking at wind turbines we should ban all windows immediately! Get a grip you people, you are lied to and don’#t appear to have the necessary nouse to realise it.

  • Hard Little Machine

    God damn I’m not allowed to move bats from my attic from May to August because it’s mating season and they’re protected.

    • Peter Simmons

      Quite right too, all this is lies by the way. Don’t fall for cobbled together unscientific crap is the best policy.

  • Uncle Al

    Social advocacy is judged by intent not result. Those turbines will save our children from Klimate Kaos, sea level rising to inundate all continents, and global spontaneous combustion in 2100 AD. The bats are noble sacrifices in the War on Causality.

    Anybody who says otherwise is thus proven unqualified to comment.

    • Pingston

      I hope that’s meant as sarcasm.

    • Peter Simmons

      The numbers are miniscule, there IS no mass killing.

  • Joan_Savage

    Apparently some white-painted turbines attract insects, which in turn attract insectivore birds, which in turn attract birds of prey. It could be an alternate hypothesis if bats are attracted to turbine-related insects, rather than to air qualities of the turbines. Someone looked into painting turbines with colors unattractive to insects, but I don’t know how that experiment went.

    • Peter Simmons

      LOL and you believed that did you? Good grief, there’s gullible and then there’s swallowing crap like that.
      ‘Apparently’ you’re also a moron.

  • 陳俊融

    We should find the balance between the environment and technology , bats can help us in mays aspects and we have many stigma about them. We should find the way immediately to protect them.

  • Peter Simmons

    Lies invented decades ago and constantly revived by the dim and those opposed to wind turbines on aesthetic grounds. Bats think turbines are trees indeed! Are you just thick or do you expect people to swallow that? I’ve been reading this nonsense for decades, probably from before this shallow writer was born, and I’ve heard it all; first it was they were striking unaware bats as they flew, then the absurdity of that dawned after many people pointed out their sound navigation was very sophisticated, then we got the imaginatyive ‘they explode bats with low pressure’, I suppose a few dribbling morons accepted that as reasonable.
    Still Elizabeth Preston is four years older now, so perhaps she’s more grownup. Trouble is this page hangs around ignored by most until read and regurgitated by some idiot with a blog in search of something to fill it with. Garbage should be taken out and disposed off, not kept for posterity when an audience will laugh at how stupid people were back in the 20 hundreds to fall for such obvious tosh. Doesn’t matter how you dress it up with ‘scientist’ quotes Elizabeth, it’s still nonsense, which is the REAL reason people don’t find any remains under turbines, they were never there because no birds or bats are killed by them. An occasional slow moving bird might accidentaslly fly into a blade with inattention, I think a few migrating large birds have been struck in the US where a whole farm of hundreds was built smack in the middle of their migration route, but ordinarily there is no such effect as described here. You fell for one of the known and long opposed lies of the anti-renewables anti climate change group of braindead rural numpties. Well done!



Like the wily and many-armed cephalopod, Inkfish reaches into the far corners of science news and brings you back surprises (and the occasional sea creature). The ink is virtual but the research is real.

About Elizabeth Preston

Elizabeth Preston is a science writer whose articles have appeared in publications including Slate, Nautilus, and National Geographic. She's also the former editor of the children's science magazine Muse, where she still writes in the voice of a know-it-all bovine. She lives in Massachusetts. Read more and see her other writing here.


See More

@Inkfish on Twitter


Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!

Collapse bottom bar