Even Monkeys See Faces in Things

By Elizabeth Preston | August 25, 2017 1:05 pm

Screen Shot 2017-08-25 at 12.48.48 PM

The impression that your cup of coffee is laughing at you, or that your laundry machine has googly eyes, is uncanny but common. It’s even the subject of a Twitter account called Faces in Things with more than half a million followers. The account has featured winking chairs, moping suitcases and a smug lemon loaf. But this illusion, called face pareidolia, isn’t uniquely human—monkeys can see it too. 

Face pareidolia could be a side effect of humans’ skill for abstraction, write psychologist Jessica Taubert of the National Institute of Mental Health and her coauthors. Or it could happen because we’re exposed to so many cartoons and illustrations that anthropomorphize non-human objects. On the other hand, maybe the illusion isn’t so special, and comes from traits that we share with other primates.

To find out whether monkeys experience face pareidolia, the scientists studied five rhesus macaques in the lab. During the experiments, each monkey saw pairs of images on a computer screen. The pairs included 45 different photos in every possible combination. Fifteen of the photos were the kinds of pictures that might appear on Faces in Things: frightened bell peppers, a shy kiwi fruit, and so on. (A separate group of human subjects had confirmed that these objects looked like faces.) Fifteen more photos were matched images that didn’t look like faces: regular peppers, a featureless kiwi. And the remaining pictures were the real faces of rhesus macaques.

Screen Shot 2017-08-25 at 1.58.46 PM

Monkey, purse monster, monster-free purse

The researchers used gaze tracking to measure how long the monkeys stared at each image in the pair. Monkeys, like humans, are known to spend longer looking at faces in a setup like this.

The macaques in the study spent more time looking at face-like objects than at ordinary objects—or at the actual faces of monkeys. They especially focused their gaze on the “eyes” and “mouths” of the illusory faces. The results were so consistent that a computer program could predict from a monkey’s eye movements whether it was looking at a fake face or its matching faceless object.

The authors think the best explanation for their results is that macaques experience the same illusion we do. “The underlying cause of this illusion is most likely common to both humans and rhesus monkeys,” they write. This makes sense, given that similar brain areas in both species respond to seeing faces.

Maybe it’s helpful for monkeys and humans—which are both social creatures—to have facial detection systems that are “broadly tuned,” the researchers say. If we see facial features in peppers and washing machines, we’re sure not to miss the face of a fellow animal.


Image: Taubert et al.

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Erik Bosma

    That is so friggin stupid actually giving this ‘condition’ a name. My God, we see faces in things because we see faces in things. How much government money did this scam suck in?

    • Erik Bosma

      Watch me draw a face on this paper. Wow!!! I can see a face in it!

  • OWilson

    The answer is boring.

    Evolution has given us the ability to pick out patterns from the background noise. Is that a lion, or a pile of rocks?

    Sometime we see things that aren’t really there! Some folks would say better to err on the side of caution though! :)

  • TLongmire

    Reality has an underlying consciousness which manifests itself when one focuses upon it.

  • Max

    Not just monkeys- my dog growed and barked at a box that was ‘looking’ at her

  • Florida Limey

    To recognize the face of a predator in the long grass or shadow, that recognition added an obvious evolutionary advantage to our early ancestors.

  • Erik Bosma

    It looks like a face because it looks like a face.

NEW ON DISCOVER
OPEN
CITIZEN SCIENCE
ADVERTISEMENT

Inkfish

Like the wily and many-armed cephalopod, Inkfish reaches into the far corners of science news and brings you back surprises (and the occasional sea creature). The ink is virtual but the research is real.

About Elizabeth Preston

Elizabeth Preston is a science writer whose articles have appeared in publications including Slate, Nautilus, and National Geographic. She's also the former editor of the children's science magazine Muse, where she still writes in the voice of a know-it-all bovine. She lives in Massachusetts. Read more and see her other writing here.

ADVERTISEMENT

See More

@Inkfish on Twitter

ADVERTISEMENT

Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!

Collapse bottom bar
+