<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unscientific America: Page 4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2009/05/30/unscientific-america-page-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2009/05/30/unscientific-america-page-4/</link>
	<description>Where science collides with life, slams into culture, crashes with politics, and gets totaled.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 17:28:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurel Kornfeld</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2009/05/30/unscientific-america-page-4/#comment-18039</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurel Kornfeld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 04:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2009/05/30/unscientific-america-page-4/#comment-18039</guid>
		<description>The snubbing of Pluto will be undone, if not this year, then certainly when New Horizons gets there in 2015.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The snubbing of Pluto will be undone, if not this year, then certainly when New Horizons gets there in 2015.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wes Rolley</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2009/05/30/unscientific-america-page-4/#comment-18019</link>
		<dc:creator>Wes Rolley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 15:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2009/05/30/unscientific-america-page-4/#comment-18019</guid>
		<description>I sometimes wonder if we have lost all connection to the real world.  When I was still in the corporate world, I had the opportunity to hear a VP from Toshiba talk about software and engineers.  He said that he insisted their developers get away from the &quot;green glass&quot; (that tells you how long ago and why I don&#039;t remember his name...) and spend some time in the real world.  For chip developers, this meant working in the clean room. 

Science is only a way of understanding the real world in a predictable, repeatable way.  

It seems that we have lost other connections to the real world, as suggested by Matthew B. Crawford in the May 21st article in the NY Times: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/24/magazine/24labor-t.html?&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Case for Working With Your Hands. &lt;/a&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;High-school shop-class programs were widely dismantled in the 1990s as educators prepared students to become “knowledge workers.” The imperative of the last 20 years to round up every warm body and send it to college, then to the cubicle, was tied to a vision of the future in which we somehow take leave of material reality and glide about in a pure information economy. This has not come to pass. To begin with, such work often feels more enervating than gliding. More fundamentally, now as ever, somebody has to actually do things: fix our cars, unclog our toilets, build our houses.&lt;/blockquote&gt;   It seems that, in many ways, we really don&#039;t want to know how the world works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sometimes wonder if we have lost all connection to the real world.  When I was still in the corporate world, I had the opportunity to hear a VP from Toshiba talk about software and engineers.  He said that he insisted their developers get away from the &#8220;green glass&#8221; (that tells you how long ago and why I don&#8217;t remember his name&#8230;) and spend some time in the real world.  For chip developers, this meant working in the clean room. </p>
<p>Science is only a way of understanding the real world in a predictable, repeatable way.  </p>
<p>It seems that we have lost other connections to the real world, as suggested by Matthew B. Crawford in the May 21st article in the NY Times: <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/24/magazine/24labor-t.html?" rel="nofollow">The Case for Working With Your Hands. </a><br />
<blockquote>High-school shop-class programs were widely dismantled in the 1990s as educators prepared students to become “knowledge workers.” The imperative of the last 20 years to round up every warm body and send it to college, then to the cubicle, was tied to a vision of the future in which we somehow take leave of material reality and glide about in a pure information economy. This has not come to pass. To begin with, such work often feels more enervating than gliding. More fundamentally, now as ever, somebody has to actually do things: fix our cars, unclog our toilets, build our houses.</p></blockquote>
<p>   It seems that, in many ways, we really don&#8217;t want to know how the world works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curious Wavefunction</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2009/05/30/unscientific-america-page-4/#comment-18016</link>
		<dc:creator>Curious Wavefunction</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 13:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2009/05/30/unscientific-america-page-4/#comment-18016</guid>
		<description>At least people named Bill Gates, Einstein and Gore and not Marilyn Manson and Britney Spears. Gore  and Gates are of course the two names that come to your mind when someone says &quot;scientist&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least people named Bill Gates, Einstein and Gore and not Marilyn Manson and Britney Spears. Gore  and Gates are of course the two names that come to your mind when someone says &#8220;scientist&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unscientific America: Page 3 &#124; The Intersection &#124; Discover Magazine</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2009/05/30/unscientific-america-page-4/#comment-18013</link>
		<dc:creator>Unscientific America: Page 3 &#124; The Intersection &#124; Discover Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 12:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2009/05/30/unscientific-america-page-4/#comment-18013</guid>
		<description>[...] convenience, here are the links to look back over pages 1 and 2. Here is the link to the next page, 4. For more information and to preorder from Amazon, click [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] convenience, here are the links to look back over pages 1 and 2. Here is the link to the next page, 4. For more information and to preorder from Amazon, click [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-02-14 17:37:11 -->
