<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Evolution is True, But Coyne is Wrong About Religion, Part II: Lessons of Dover</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2009/06/05/why-evolution-is-true-but-coyne-is-wrong-about-religion-part-ii-lessons-of-dover/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2009/06/05/why-evolution-is-true-but-coyne-is-wrong-about-religion-part-ii-lessons-of-dover/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 17:28:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gardner Recall</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2009/06/05/why-evolution-is-true-but-coyne-is-wrong-about-religion-part-ii-lessons-of-dover/#comment-19034</link>
		<dc:creator>Gardner Recall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 06:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2009/06/05/why-evolution-is-true-but-coyne-is-wrong-about-religion-part-ii-lessons-of-dover/#comment-19034</guid>
		<description>The citizens of Gardner, KS are currently working to recall two members of their City Council.  The recall is tied up in the courts at the moment, but it should go to a vote in March of 2010.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The citizens of Gardner, KS are currently working to recall two members of their City Council.  The recall is tied up in the courts at the moment, but it should go to a vote in March of 2010.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Theobald</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2009/06/05/why-evolution-is-true-but-coyne-is-wrong-about-religion-part-ii-lessons-of-dover/#comment-19033</link>
		<dc:creator>Theobald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 15:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2009/06/05/why-evolution-is-true-but-coyne-is-wrong-about-religion-part-ii-lessons-of-dover/#comment-19033</guid>
		<description>Larry is making progress.  He has recently accepted on his blog the unproven conjecture that the earth is more than a few thousand years old although he does leave room for skepticism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Larry is making progress.  He has recently accepted on his blog the unproven conjecture that the earth is more than a few thousand years old although he does leave room for skepticism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mel</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2009/06/05/why-evolution-is-true-but-coyne-is-wrong-about-religion-part-ii-lessons-of-dover/#comment-19032</link>
		<dc:creator>Mel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 04:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2009/06/05/why-evolution-is-true-but-coyne-is-wrong-about-religion-part-ii-lessons-of-dover/#comment-19032</guid>
		<description>And Larry, no one will ever take your coevolution &quot;arguments&quot; seriously until you show at least some understanding or familiarity with the voluminous scientific literature on the topic.  But that would require that read some of the papers for comprehension, which you seem to be incapable of.  Until then, you will remain a laughingstock (though you serve a purpose in that - I know that reading your &quot;arguments&quot; at the graduate coevolution reading group I am in gave everyone a much needed laugh at your ignorance and incoherence).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And Larry, no one will ever take your coevolution &#8220;arguments&#8221; seriously until you show at least some understanding or familiarity with the voluminous scientific literature on the topic.  But that would require that read some of the papers for comprehension, which you seem to be incapable of.  Until then, you will remain a laughingstock (though you serve a purpose in that &#8211; I know that reading your &#8220;arguments&#8221; at the graduate coevolution reading group I am in gave everyone a much needed laugh at your ignorance and incoherence).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mel</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2009/06/05/why-evolution-is-true-but-coyne-is-wrong-about-religion-part-ii-lessons-of-dover/#comment-19031</link>
		<dc:creator>Mel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 04:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2009/06/05/why-evolution-is-true-but-coyne-is-wrong-about-religion-part-ii-lessons-of-dover/#comment-19031</guid>
		<description>Believe it or not, Larry is actually in his mid-60&#039;s.  He got fired from his job as a mechanical engineer several years ago, likely because of the mental instability that he showed here in this thread and is in even greater evidence on blog.  This is what he does with his days now.  He goes into various discussions, makes inane &quot;arguments&quot; that betray a complete lack of logical thinking and ignorance, and then proceeds to hurl juvenile names at anyone who disagrees with him or asks him to read anything.  He would be really sad if he weren&#039;t such a hateful, hateful man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Believe it or not, Larry is actually in his mid-60&#8242;s.  He got fired from his job as a mechanical engineer several years ago, likely because of the mental instability that he showed here in this thread and is in even greater evidence on blog.  This is what he does with his days now.  He goes into various discussions, makes inane &#8220;arguments&#8221; that betray a complete lack of logical thinking and ignorance, and then proceeds to hurl juvenile names at anyone who disagrees with him or asks him to read anything.  He would be really sad if he weren&#8217;t such a hateful, hateful man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Constant Mews</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2009/06/05/why-evolution-is-true-but-coyne-is-wrong-about-religion-part-ii-lessons-of-dover/#comment-19030</link>
		<dc:creator>Constant Mews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 04:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2009/06/05/why-evolution-is-true-but-coyne-is-wrong-about-religion-part-ii-lessons-of-dover/#comment-19030</guid>
		<description>Larry, whining and complaining that no one took your assertions seriously is disingenuous - any number of people engaged you on this thread.  The difficulty you face is that you failed to deal with their arguments, and in return presented none of your own.

Asserting that you&#039;ve &quot;won&quot; an argument that you didn&#039;t even begin to make is remarkably childish behavior - are you sure you wish your final contribution (such as it is) on this thread to look as though you&#039;re behaving like a spoiled child?

Be a man!  Make a real argument!  Don&#039;t behave like a child having a temper tantrum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Larry, whining and complaining that no one took your assertions seriously is disingenuous &#8211; any number of people engaged you on this thread.  The difficulty you face is that you failed to deal with their arguments, and in return presented none of your own.</p>
<p>Asserting that you&#8217;ve &#8220;won&#8221; an argument that you didn&#8217;t even begin to make is remarkably childish behavior &#8211; are you sure you wish your final contribution (such as it is) on this thread to look as though you&#8217;re behaving like a spoiled child?</p>
<p>Be a man!  Make a real argument!  Don&#8217;t behave like a child having a temper tantrum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arnold</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2009/06/05/why-evolution-is-true-but-coyne-is-wrong-about-religion-part-ii-lessons-of-dover/#comment-19029</link>
		<dc:creator>Arnold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 21:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2009/06/05/why-evolution-is-true-but-coyne-is-wrong-about-religion-part-ii-lessons-of-dover/#comment-19029</guid>
		<description>&gt; It is obvious to anyone with half a brain &lt;

Yes, but to those of us with whole brains, you haven&#039;t made your point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; It is obvious to anyone with half a brain &lt;</p>
<p>Yes, but to those of us with whole brains, you haven&#039;t made your point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arnold</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2009/06/05/why-evolution-is-true-but-coyne-is-wrong-about-religion-part-ii-lessons-of-dover/#comment-19028</link>
		<dc:creator>Arnold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 21:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2009/06/05/why-evolution-is-true-but-coyne-is-wrong-about-religion-part-ii-lessons-of-dover/#comment-19028</guid>
		<description>In order to win an argument, you will first have to make one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In order to win an argument, you will first have to make one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Fafarman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2009/06/05/why-evolution-is-true-but-coyne-is-wrong-about-religion-part-ii-lessons-of-dover/#comment-19027</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Fafarman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 19:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2009/06/05/why-evolution-is-true-but-coyne-is-wrong-about-religion-part-ii-lessons-of-dover/#comment-19027</guid>
		<description>I repeat:   As the saying goes,  don&#039;t feed the trolls.

It is obvious to anyone with half a brain that I have already won the argument about coevolution  several times over in this thread.    These lousy trolls did not even participate in the discussion.    They are just big bags of hot air.  They are just sore losers.

&quot;I&#039;m always kicking their butts -- that&#039;s why they don&#039;t like me.&quot;
-- Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I repeat:   As the saying goes,  don&#8217;t feed the trolls.</p>
<p>It is obvious to anyone with half a brain that I have already won the argument about coevolution  several times over in this thread.    These lousy trolls did not even participate in the discussion.    They are just big bags of hot air.  They are just sore losers.</p>
<p>&#8220;I&#8217;m always kicking their butts &#8212; that&#8217;s why they don&#8217;t like me.&#8221;<br />
&#8211; Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Constant Mews</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2009/06/05/why-evolution-is-true-but-coyne-is-wrong-about-religion-part-ii-lessons-of-dover/#comment-19026</link>
		<dc:creator>Constant Mews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2009/06/05/why-evolution-is-true-but-coyne-is-wrong-about-religion-part-ii-lessons-of-dover/#comment-19026</guid>
		<description>Larry, your post was nothing but scoffing.  Don&#039;t you see that you are engaged in the very behavior you decry?  If you feel that coevolution represents a difficulty for evolutionary theory, you&#039;ve yet to demonstrate it.  So far as I can see, and I have reread all your posts here and at your blog several times, your entire case may be summed up as, &quot;I don&#039;t believe it.&quot;

That&#039;s not an argument, Larry.  Where are your facts?  Where is your chain of logic?  Where is something we can actually discuss?

Constant</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Larry, your post was nothing but scoffing.  Don&#8217;t you see that you are engaged in the very behavior you decry?  If you feel that coevolution represents a difficulty for evolutionary theory, you&#8217;ve yet to demonstrate it.  So far as I can see, and I have reread all your posts here and at your blog several times, your entire case may be summed up as, &#8220;I don&#8217;t believe it.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not an argument, Larry.  Where are your facts?  Where is your chain of logic?  Where is something we can actually discuss?</p>
<p>Constant</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Theobald</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2009/06/05/why-evolution-is-true-but-coyne-is-wrong-about-religion-part-ii-lessons-of-dover/#comment-19025</link>
		<dc:creator>Theobald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2009/06/05/why-evolution-is-true-but-coyne-is-wrong-about-religion-part-ii-lessons-of-dover/#comment-19025</guid>
		<description>Debates cannot be won by mindless repetition of already disproven and completely destroyed arguments, pretense that your opponents have not answered questions that they have answered endlessly, nor of insults such as the childish drivel on your blog: &quot;Judge Jackass Jones, Evil Genie, Sleezy PZ, Fathead Ed&quot;, etc.

It might also help if you were to chose your causes more carefully.  Your previous insistence that the moon landings took place in a Hollywood studio and that meteors came from within the atmosphere were no more defensible than your current ones.  I don&#039;t know how anyone who lost relatives in the holocaust can claim that it did not occur but obviously you have a different idea of the meaning of reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Debates cannot be won by mindless repetition of already disproven and completely destroyed arguments, pretense that your opponents have not answered questions that they have answered endlessly, nor of insults such as the childish drivel on your blog: &#8220;Judge Jackass Jones, Evil Genie, Sleezy PZ, Fathead Ed&#8221;, etc.</p>
<p>It might also help if you were to chose your causes more carefully.  Your previous insistence that the moon landings took place in a Hollywood studio and that meteors came from within the atmosphere were no more defensible than your current ones.  I don&#8217;t know how anyone who lost relatives in the holocaust can claim that it did not occur but obviously you have a different idea of the meaning of reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
