Archive for August 26th, 2009

The Future of Kissing?

By Sheril Kirshenbaum | August 26, 2009 10:17 pm

Sure there’s fear over nanobots, but what about kissingbots? Imagine (or shudder at) the possibilities…

The details at cnet news.


The Science of Kissing: Progress Update

By Sheril Kirshenbaum | August 26, 2009 4:40 pm

With less than five weeks to the kissing book deadline, I’ve just printed the entire manuscript for the first time. Until now I’ve been looking at limited sections as necessary to save paper, mostly working on the laptop.¬† Its composition has been a very different process from Unscientific America with Chris because this time around, I’m responsible for every interview, staying on schedule, and balancing the project with other commitments. Tomorrow I’ll head north to concentrate on editing, fact-checking, and overall structure. Blogging will continue and CM also returns next week.

It’s a bit strange to finally hold something that represents the culmination of countless hours of research and writing: A rather surreal experience when time and keystrokes suddenly become tangible. Metamorphosis. It’s been quite a journey so far and the subject is vastly more intriguing than I could have imagined. And yet, pouring over the manuscript feels a bit like ‘stopping by woods on a snowy evening‘…

The woods are lovely, dark and deep.
But I have promises to keep,
And miles to go before I sleep,
And miles to go before I sleep.


Responding To Ginger Taylor: On Autism And Vaccination, Do Not Confuse Correlation With Causation

By Sheril Kirshenbaum | August 26, 2009 11:41 am

Over at Age of Autism, Ginger Taylor posted a letter to us regarding Chris’ recent LA Times interview with Lori Kozlowski. She begins:

Lori, Chris and Sheril,

I am an autism parent with an MS is Clinical Counseling from Johns Hopkins University and a contributor to Age of Autism. I maintain my own blog at Adventures in Autism.

I saw Lori’s piece today and would like to point out a few things that seem incredibly obvious from where I am sitting, but you genuinely don’t seem to have on your radar (from what I could tell from the article), in regards to why America is not embracing “science” as you think they should. I hope you will be open to hearing from me for a moment, because there is a problem, but the problem may not be the public.

I feel like you may have confused actual hard “Science” with “things that most scientists think”, as there seems to be a denial of the fact that scientific consensus has quite often been (and most assuredly still is in many places) wrong.

I was going to respond this morning, but Orac’s already done a terrific job:

We humans are hard-wired to leap to conclusions and confuse correlation with causation. If we weren’t, we might not need science nearly as much as we do to determine what causes what disease and what treatments work for what disease. Harriet Hall explains it well when she observes that “I saw it with my own eyes!” is not enough. We humans confuse correlation with causation all the time. Given the millions of children who receive vaccines around the age range that the first symptoms of autism most frequently manifest themselves, it is to be expected that some children will regress after vaccines by random chance alone. To those parents, it seems for all the world that the vaccines caused the regression.

Orac goes into great detail explaining all the trouble with Ginger’s argument. Go read his full response at Respectful Insolence

CATEGORIZED UNDER: Culture, Education
MORE ABOUT: age of autism, autism


By Sheril Kirshenbaum | August 26, 2009 8:39 am


MORE ABOUT: Ted Kennedy

Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!


See More

Collapse bottom bar