http://bit.ly/3Ud0ts

The question remains — given these issues, how accurate are they — really — in “crystal balling” future climate?

I still want to see the laboratory experiment publication showing CO2 levels influence ambient temperatures. This question has always been avoided.

Also, scientists measured CO2 levels from Mt. Redoudt at 10,000 tons/day during the last eruption. How in the heck are you going to stop that?

When the relation between CO2 and temperatures were recently restudied, the data came from Hawaii about 2 miles from the active flowing volcano. Hmmm, Volcanoes produce large quantities of CO2. Hmmmm, lava is extremely hot. No bias there……..

Specific heat capacity water – 4.187 kJ/kgK
Specific heat capacity water vapor – 1.996 kJ/kgK
Specific heat capacity carbon dioxide at 300 (80 degrees F) kelvin – 0.846 kJ/kgK

Atmospheric concentration
Water vapor – 4% in upper atmosphere to 40% near the surface
CO2 – 0.036%

CO2 has been shown NOT to redirect energy back to the Earth’s Surface.

So, what’s up with these numbers

who is “we”? you refer to “we” in your posts, instead of “I”. Are you a “group” / “pack” or an “individual” making the posts? Just curious.

And very nice website / blog you have. Not exactly Science that you cover though — seems to just be all about bashing the Right. I am sure, certain, that is a mere coincidence though — and that your politics would never, couldn’t possibly modulate your interpretation of the science. Good on you!

Can you see why we have trouble taking you seriously?

That’s a reeeaaaaaaallllllly vague statement that needs some clarifying before it can be answered, Sean. What do you mean by “replicable?” Do you mean “replicable” as in:

1.) another climate scientist with the correct background knowledge/training could repeat the analysis?

or 2.) we should be able to create a fake Earth, let it run for 6 billion years, and then go crank out some tree ring data and ice cores?

And if you don’t understand what I’m talking about, you likely don’t have business asking.

‘Truth is the daughter of time’ was forgotten by this specific Scientific Fiefdom, but acknowledgment of other traditional philosophies which built science to the current respect also have been ignored, such as “Science has no place in politics, religion, entertainment, fame and wealth”. Often, however, such important socially advancing fields as science need set backs and thus force both current and potential abusers to fall back to traditional thinking. This is the nature in the evolution of human thought and growth.

The hubris of denial by these abusers of social trust, along with their followers, of the devastating magnitude of their deceptive and deviant activity, while trying to maintain their stature in civilization, is incomprehensible. This denial will continue dragging the entire scientific community into the pit. Unfortunately, a self awakened reality of their misdeeds likely will not appear until admission followed by humility becomes obvious to society. Forgiveness is the divinity of our civilization but forgetting never can be allowed.

Bilbo, do you believe that the CRU and/or GISS temperature records are replicable?

Instead, it appears that the “circle the wagons” mentality has completely blown up in their faces.