<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kind Of Like A Lot Of Climate Change Skeptics, Evolution Denialists, And The AntiVax Movement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2009/12/16/kind-of-like-most-climate-change-skeptics-evolution-denialists-and-the-antivax-movement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2009/12/16/kind-of-like-most-climate-change-skeptics-evolution-denialists-and-the-antivax-movement/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 17:28:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sorbet</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2009/12/16/kind-of-like-most-climate-change-skeptics-evolution-denialists-and-the-antivax-movement/#comment-35263</link>
		<dc:creator>Sorbet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/?p=5442#comment-35263</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Shall we continue, Professor?&lt;/i&gt;

Bilbo, obviously you are not a very good student because I was not trying to make a logical argument in the first place and this point seems to have sailed past you. One can indulge in a logical fallacy only if one is trying to make a logical argument, correct? Read a book on logic please. I was simply saying that anyone who knows my words on this blog will know that I am not known for making arguments from authority.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Shall we continue, Professor?</i></p>
<p>Bilbo, obviously you are not a very good student because I was not trying to make a logical argument in the first place and this point seems to have sailed past you. One can indulge in a logical fallacy only if one is trying to make a logical argument, correct? Read a book on logic please. I was simply saying that anyone who knows my words on this blog will know that I am not known for making arguments from authority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marion Delgado</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2009/12/16/kind-of-like-most-climate-change-skeptics-evolution-denialists-and-the-antivax-movement/#comment-35262</link>
		<dc:creator>Marion Delgado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 08:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/?p=5442#comment-35262</guid>
		<description>Randi is scientISM, not science. The same as Penn Jillette.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Randi is scientISM, not science. The same as Penn Jillette.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marion Delgado</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2009/12/16/kind-of-like-most-climate-change-skeptics-evolution-denialists-and-the-antivax-movement/#comment-35261</link>
		<dc:creator>Marion Delgado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 08:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/?p=5442#comment-35261</guid>
		<description>They laughed at Tesla, too! And Charles Einstein Galileo!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They laughed at Tesla, too! And Charles Einstein Galileo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sorbet</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2009/12/16/kind-of-like-most-climate-change-skeptics-evolution-denialists-and-the-antivax-movement/#comment-35260</link>
		<dc:creator>Sorbet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 02:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/?p=5442#comment-35260</guid>
		<description>Uhh...I don&#039;t really care much about Randi. I think he is a cool skeptic and his analysis of homeopathy is spot on but that&#039;s about that. What I am saying is that the statement was not meant to be a logical connection to begin with. Anyway, enjoy:

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uhh&#8230;I don&#8217;t really care much about Randi. I think he is a cool skeptic and his analysis of homeopathy is spot on but that&#8217;s about that. What I am saying is that the statement was not meant to be a logical connection to begin with. Anyway, enjoy:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MichaelWH</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2009/12/16/kind-of-like-most-climate-change-skeptics-evolution-denialists-and-the-antivax-movement/#comment-35259</link>
		<dc:creator>MichaelWH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 02:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/?p=5442#comment-35259</guid>
		<description>Why do people on both sides of this issue always come across as children squabbling in a sandbox?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do people on both sides of this issue always come across as children squabbling in a sandbox?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bilbo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2009/12/16/kind-of-like-most-climate-change-skeptics-evolution-denialists-and-the-antivax-movement/#comment-35258</link>
		<dc:creator>bilbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 01:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/?p=5442#comment-35258</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt; Your are muddying the water by talking about murder and Randi&lt;/i&gt;

No. I&#039;m applying your logic to other situations to which you aren&#039;t personally connected. (Although, you seem to take things about Randi reallllllllllly personal).

&lt;i&gt;In fact, the distinction between skeptics and deniers should be made very clear for a very important reason; otherwise the true deniers will call themselves skeptics and try to get away with it, and we can never allow the charlatans to do that.&lt;/i&gt;

Now there&#039;s something we can both agree on!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> Your are muddying the water by talking about murder and Randi</i></p>
<p>No. I&#8217;m applying your logic to other situations to which you aren&#8217;t personally connected. (Although, you seem to take things about Randi reallllllllllly personal).</p>
<p><i>In fact, the distinction between skeptics and deniers should be made very clear for a very important reason; otherwise the true deniers will call themselves skeptics and try to get away with it, and we can never allow the charlatans to do that.</i></p>
<p>Now there&#8217;s something we can both agree on!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SLC</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2009/12/16/kind-of-like-most-climate-change-skeptics-evolution-denialists-and-the-antivax-movement/#comment-35257</link>
		<dc:creator>SLC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 01:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/?p=5442#comment-35257</guid>
		<description>Re Michael @ #12

Yessir, global cooling underway.  As proof, the Northwest Passage was open to shipping for the first time since European settlers arrived in North America.  Glaciers in Bolivia are disappearing,.  A new law of physics: lowering temperatures causes ice to melt.  End snark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re Michael @ #12</p>
<p>Yessir, global cooling underway.  As proof, the Northwest Passage was open to shipping for the first time since European settlers arrived in North America.  Glaciers in Bolivia are disappearing,.  A new law of physics: lowering temperatures causes ice to melt.  End snark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sorbet</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2009/12/16/kind-of-like-most-climate-change-skeptics-evolution-denialists-and-the-antivax-movement/#comment-35256</link>
		<dc:creator>Sorbet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 22:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/?p=5442#comment-35256</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a longer comment in moderation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a longer comment in moderation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sorbet</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2009/12/16/kind-of-like-most-climate-change-skeptics-evolution-denialists-and-the-antivax-movement/#comment-35255</link>
		<dc:creator>Sorbet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 22:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/?p=5442#comment-35255</guid>
		<description>In fact, the distinction between skeptics and deniers should be made very clear for a very important reason; otherwise the true deniers will call themselves skeptics and try to get away with it, and we can never allow the charlatans to do that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In fact, the distinction between skeptics and deniers should be made very clear for a very important reason; otherwise the true deniers will call themselves skeptics and try to get away with it, and we can never allow the charlatans to do that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yllaria</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2009/12/16/kind-of-like-most-climate-change-skeptics-evolution-denialists-and-the-antivax-movement/#comment-35254</link>
		<dc:creator>Yllaria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 22:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/?p=5442#comment-35254</guid>
		<description>Just FYI, XKCD has mouseover messages.  The message for this cartoon is:  &quot;I mean, what&#039;s more likely -- that I have uncovered fundamental flaws in this field that no one in it has ever thought about, or that I need to read a little more?  Hint: it&#039;s the one that involves less work.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just FYI, XKCD has mouseover messages.  The message for this cartoon is:  &#8220;I mean, what&#8217;s more likely &#8212; that I have uncovered fundamental flaws in this field that no one in it has ever thought about, or that I need to read a little more?  Hint: it&#8217;s the one that involves less work.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
