<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Communication, Does the IPCC Still Not Get It?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2011/05/31/on-communication-does-the-ipcc-still-not-get-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2011/05/31/on-communication-does-the-ipcc-still-not-get-it/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 17:28:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lab Lemming</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2011/05/31/on-communication-does-the-ipcc-still-not-get-it/#comment-53857</link>
		<dc:creator>Lab Lemming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 09:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/?p=18434#comment-53857</guid>
		<description>hi Chris,
Do you have an explanation for the geographic distribution of google queries about global warming?  A handy pic is the second to last figure here:
http://lablemminglounge.blogspot.com/2011/05/geochemical-googling.html
Or you can play with the correlate tool (see Razib&#039;s post) to generate your own figure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi Chris,<br />
Do you have an explanation for the geographic distribution of google queries about global warming?  A handy pic is the second to last figure here:<br />
<a href="http://lablemminglounge.blogspot.com/2011/05/geochemical-googling.html" rel="nofollow">http://lablemminglounge.blogspot.com/2011/05/geochemical-googling.html</a><br />
Or you can play with the correlate tool (see Razib&#8217;s post) to generate your own figure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly Rigg</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2011/05/31/on-communication-does-the-ipcc-still-not-get-it/#comment-53856</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly Rigg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 06:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/?p=18434#comment-53856</guid>
		<description>Actually, there are many groups/people voluntarily helping the IPCC with communications. This does not replace the need for coordination and clear communications strategy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, there are many groups/people voluntarily helping the IPCC with communications. This does not replace the need for coordination and clear communications strategy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Easterbrook</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2011/05/31/on-communication-does-the-ipcc-still-not-get-it/#comment-53855</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Easterbrook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 22:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/?p=18434#comment-53855</guid>
		<description>What TransientEddy said.
The IPCC is a volunteer organization. Its about time all those pundits who do communication for a living stepped up to the plate. It&#039;s not the IPCC that&#039;s broken - it does it&#039;s job (assess the science) brilliantly. Its everything after that that is broken. Is Revkin planning to get together an equivalent group of journalists and commentators to step into this role??
No, thought not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What TransientEddy said.<br />
The IPCC is a volunteer organization. Its about time all those pundits who do communication for a living stepped up to the plate. It&#8217;s not the IPCC that&#8217;s broken &#8211; it does it&#8217;s job (assess the science) brilliantly. Its everything after that that is broken. Is Revkin planning to get together an equivalent group of journalists and commentators to step into this role??<br />
No, thought not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TransientEddy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2011/05/31/on-communication-does-the-ipcc-still-not-get-it/#comment-53854</link>
		<dc:creator>TransientEddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 20:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/?p=18434#comment-53854</guid>
		<description>Scientists who participate in the IPCC do so for free, without any direct compensation. It is a service activity that often takes away from basic research, teaching, writing grants, advising students, and the myriad of other activities required of scientists to keep their jobs.

How many journalists and communicators, like you and Revkin, are stepping up to volunteer their services to the IPCC? Anyone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scientists who participate in the IPCC do so for free, without any direct compensation. It is a service activity that often takes away from basic research, teaching, writing grants, advising students, and the myriad of other activities required of scientists to keep their jobs.</p>
<p>How many journalists and communicators, like you and Revkin, are stepping up to volunteer their services to the IPCC? Anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
