<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Liberals Mislead On GOP Cuts To USGS In Wake Of Earthquake, Still Reason For Concern</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2011/08/24/liberals-mislead-on-gop-cuts-to-usgs-in-wake-of-earthquake-still-reason-for-concern/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2011/08/24/liberals-mislead-on-gop-cuts-to-usgs-in-wake-of-earthquake-still-reason-for-concern/</link>
	<description>Where science collides with life, slams into culture, crashes with politics, and gets totaled.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 17:28:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Managing Austerity's Axe &#124; Progressive Policy Institute</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2011/08/24/liberals-mislead-on-gop-cuts-to-usgs-in-wake-of-earthquake-still-reason-for-concern/#comment-113430</link>
		<dc:creator>Managing Austerity's Axe &#124; Progressive Policy Institute</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2011 15:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/?p=20670#comment-113430</guid>
		<description>[...] the wake of Hurricane Irene, there has been consternation over whether the GOP proposed cuts to the United States Geological Survey signifies that they were [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the wake of Hurricane Irene, there has been consternation over whether the GOP proposed cuts to the United States Geological Survey signifies that they were [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2011/08/24/liberals-mislead-on-gop-cuts-to-usgs-in-wake-of-earthquake-still-reason-for-concern/#comment-111917</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 04:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/?p=20670#comment-111917</guid>
		<description>&quot;...they will not escape the effects of their attacks on climate science. History will judge them for these decisions.&quot;

Unfortunately, no. By the time history renders it&#039;s verdict, they will be long gone, which is one of the reasons that they could care less about the effects of their attacks. Their escape is already well in place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;they will not escape the effects of their attacks on climate science. History will judge them for these decisions.&#8221;</p>
<p>Unfortunately, no. By the time history renders it&#8217;s verdict, they will be long gone, which is one of the reasons that they could care less about the effects of their attacks. Their escape is already well in place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jinchi</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2011/08/24/liberals-mislead-on-gop-cuts-to-usgs-in-wake-of-earthquake-still-reason-for-concern/#comment-111892</link>
		<dc:creator>Jinchi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 00:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/?p=20670#comment-111892</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;The implication of these tweets and blog posts was that Republicans had made budget cuts that would seemingly have an impact on our ability to monitor and respond to earthquakes. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

I disagree. The implication is that &lt;b&gt;if Eric Cantor had gotten his way&lt;/b&gt; those cuts would have impacted our ability to monitor and respond to earthquakes, which is true.

Likewise, many Republicans want to dismantle the Social Security and Medicare programs. They pay a price for that, even though their attempts to date have failed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The implication of these tweets and blog posts was that Republicans had made budget cuts that would seemingly have an impact on our ability to monitor and respond to earthquakes. </p></blockquote>
<p>I disagree. The implication is that <b>if Eric Cantor had gotten his way</b> those cuts would have impacted our ability to monitor and respond to earthquakes, which is true.</p>
<p>Likewise, many Republicans want to dismantle the Social Security and Medicare programs. They pay a price for that, even though their attempts to date have failed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sylvia Tognetti</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2011/08/24/liberals-mislead-on-gop-cuts-to-usgs-in-wake-of-earthquake-still-reason-for-concern/#comment-111882</link>
		<dc:creator>Sylvia Tognetti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 22:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/?p=20670#comment-111882</guid>
		<description>Re: &quot;They will be held accountable for the cuts that were implemented&quot; (i.e., ecosystems and climate variability)  - obviously they were not. If the funding was restored for the more natural immediate disasters, it is likely that it was because they were held accountable and pressured by constituents. Whether they will in the future may depend on some catastrophic or at least highly visible event, like when the dustbowl flew over the capital.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: &#8220;They will be held accountable for the cuts that were implemented&#8221; (i.e., ecosystems and climate variability)  &#8211; obviously they were not. If the funding was restored for the more natural immediate disasters, it is likely that it was because they were held accountable and pressured by constituents. Whether they will in the future may depend on some catastrophic or at least highly visible event, like when the dustbowl flew over the capital.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2011/08/24/liberals-mislead-on-gop-cuts-to-usgs-in-wake-of-earthquake-still-reason-for-concern/#comment-111839</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 16:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/?p=20670#comment-111839</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m progressive and read this, but missed the twitstorm. But good post, Jamie! Thanks for correcting the record.

There&#039;s a big nuclear plant outside of San Diego - you know, that tip of California that is the most likely to snap off the mainland when the Big One hits? Excellent planning. I don&#039;t have a person or ideology to blame for that, but the idea of it haunts me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m progressive and read this, but missed the twitstorm. But good post, Jamie! Thanks for correcting the record.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a big nuclear plant outside of San Diego &#8211; you know, that tip of California that is the most likely to snap off the mainland when the Big One hits? Excellent planning. I don&#8217;t have a person or ideology to blame for that, but the idea of it haunts me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe H.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2011/08/24/liberals-mislead-on-gop-cuts-to-usgs-in-wake-of-earthquake-still-reason-for-concern/#comment-111837</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 16:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/?p=20670#comment-111837</guid>
		<description>Even with the update from emptywheelblog added to the context, does taking some seismographs off-line affect disaster communications? Seems like apples and oranges.

It seems like the USGS reporting system was all over this, they had seismic data up within a minute flat, and disaster communications were quick and clean. If the tools to actually communicate the disaster are still funded and in place (if I am reading your post right), then we seem to be at a place where everything worked as planned.

A more interesting observation would be to overlay the East Coast&#039;s seismic activity records for the past century over a map of active seismic recording stations that are hooked up to the USGS disaster system. Then you could see if there were actual gaps instead of mythical ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even with the update from emptywheelblog added to the context, does taking some seismographs off-line affect disaster communications? Seems like apples and oranges.</p>
<p>It seems like the USGS reporting system was all over this, they had seismic data up within a minute flat, and disaster communications were quick and clean. If the tools to actually communicate the disaster are still funded and in place (if I am reading your post right), then we seem to be at a place where everything worked as planned.</p>
<p>A more interesting observation would be to overlay the East Coast&#8217;s seismic activity records for the past century over a map of active seismic recording stations that are hooked up to the USGS disaster system. Then you could see if there were actual gaps instead of mythical ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kirk</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/2011/08/24/liberals-mislead-on-gop-cuts-to-usgs-in-wake-of-earthquake-still-reason-for-concern/#comment-111836</link>
		<dc:creator>kirk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 16:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/intersection/?p=20670#comment-111836</guid>
		<description>Five progressives will read this, 1,000,000 progressives will read the tweets. But at least one persons reasoning is unmotivated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Five progressives will read this, 1,000,000 progressives will read the tweets. But at least one persons reasoning is unmotivated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-05-26 08:12:13 -->
