<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Where Is Your I?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2005/10/25/where-is-your-i/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2005/10/25/where-is-your-i/</link>
	<description>A blog about life, past and future. Written by DISCOVER contributing editor and columnist Carl Zimmer.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 12:52:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Harmon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2005/10/25/where-is-your-i/comment-page-1/#comment-8118</link>
		<dc:creator>David Harmon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2005 01:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2005/10/25/where-is-your-i/#comment-8118</guid>
		<description>Robin: His SciAm article mentions the mirror neurons, via the work of Sarah-Jane Blakemore at University College London.

The whole discussion is interesting;  Personally, I&#039;d like to see some studies connecting the &quot;sense of self&quot; issue to social norms, i.e., the European/Asian cultural differences.  It would also be nice to see some cross-species comparisions of the neurology; I&#039;m especially interested in the language-using apes (i.e. Koko), and in dogs (because of their adaptations to human society).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robin: His SciAm article mentions the mirror neurons, via the work of Sarah-Jane Blakemore at University College London.</p>
<p>The whole discussion is interesting;  Personally, I&#8217;d like to see some studies connecting the &#8220;sense of self&#8221; issue to social norms, i.e., the European/Asian cultural differences.  It would also be nice to see some cross-species comparisions of the neurology; I&#8217;m especially interested in the language-using apes (i.e. Koko), and in dogs (because of their adaptations to human society).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2005/10/25/where-is-your-i/comment-page-1/#comment-8117</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2005 23:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2005/10/25/where-is-your-i/#comment-8117</guid>
		<description>Great article.  Surprised to not see a mention of Antonio Damasio and his work (or any of the work on mirror neurons).  Will definitely have to go pick up this issue!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article.  Surprised to not see a mention of Antonio Damasio and his work (or any of the work on mirror neurons).  Will definitely have to go pick up this issue!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gyan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2005/10/25/where-is-your-i/comment-page-1/#comment-8116</link>
		<dc:creator>Gyan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 07:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2005/10/25/where-is-your-i/#comment-8116</guid>
		<description>The article seems to treat the &#039;sense of self&#039; as the self, whereas they are distinct concepts. The self should be understood as the experiant, i.e. that to which perception binds. The &#039;sense of self&#039; is the putative boundary of the self in terms of ownership of action and of conscious representation. Those cute parlour tricks where you think it&#039;s your hand touching your nose, whereas it&#039;s actually someone else&#039;s hand, showcase anomalies in the &#039;sense of self&#039;. I don&#039;t think neuroscience is anywhere close to tackling the self itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article seems to treat the &#8216;sense of self&#8217; as the self, whereas they are distinct concepts. The self should be understood as the experiant, i.e. that to which perception binds. The &#8216;sense of self&#8217; is the putative boundary of the self in terms of ownership of action and of conscious representation. Those cute parlour tricks where you think it&#8217;s your hand touching your nose, whereas it&#8217;s actually someone else&#8217;s hand, showcase anomalies in the &#8216;sense of self&#8217;. I don&#8217;t think neuroscience is anywhere close to tackling the self itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-02-13 17:11:35 -->
