Comments on: National Geographic Gets Complex

By: brightmoon

brightmoon — Fri, 03 Nov 2006 22:56:07 +0000

great article carl …i get nat geo and i loved it …..i am waiting for the online creationist rants…this is gonna be fun (bouncing in anticipation)

By: Oldcola

Oldcola — Tue, 24 Oct 2006 16:58:49 +0000

Great stuff. Easy to access writing, beautiful/useful illustrations, helpful references.
Yeah !

By: Peri P. Laneta

Peri P. Laneta — Sat, 21 Oct 2006 20:40:18 +0000

I just read the article in the Nov. NG and it’s wonderful. You have a great facility for making complex ideas not only approachable but beautiful. If I were still teaching biology it would be on my “must read” list for both my ninth graders and for my AP students, and the photos would be on their way to my bulletin board.

By: CCP

CCP — Fri, 20 Oct 2006 16:45:18 +0000

Nice work, man. I admire your work a lot.

By: David vun Kannon

David vun Kannon — Fri, 20 Oct 2006 02:44:21 +0000

I left you a comment at Panda’s Thumb. Thanks for posting the sources here.

By: SteveF

SteveF — Thu, 19 Oct 2006 22:41:31 +0000

Yes, I can’t find any discussion of your article. However, when it turns up, you can guarantee that the usual internet creationists will flock all over it. I’d avoid like the plague if I were you Carl.

Excellent articl BTW.

By: Andrew Staroscik

Andrew Staroscik — Thu, 19 Oct 2006 21:17:18 +0000

Carl,

I got to the forums without any problem, but it looks like there is no discussion of your article (yet). I am using Firefox and there was a pop-up page to get through before I made it to the forum. If you have a pop-up blocker that may be what is preventing you from getting through.

Hope this helps

By: John Timmer

John Timmer — Thu, 19 Oct 2006 03:30:00 +0000

An additional link from a former lab mate of mine:

Maintenance of bat interdigital tissue:
http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/abstract/103/41/15103