Comments on: Does The Golden Ratio Look Less Beautiful As Numbers?
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2008/05/23/does-the-golden-ratio-look-less-beautiful-as-numbers/
Mon, 04 Feb 2013 17:13:44 +0000hourly1https://wordpress.org/?v=4.4.3By: RJ
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2008/05/23/does-the-golden-ratio-look-less-beautiful-as-numbers/#comment-7729
Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:01:26 +0000http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2008/05/23/does-the-golden-ratio-look-less-beautiful-as-numbers/#comment-7729thats kinda creepy… how much do you think that cost?
]]>By: frostfire451
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2008/05/23/does-the-golden-ratio-look-less-beautiful-as-numbers/#comment-7728
Sun, 24 May 2009 21:38:19 +0000http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2008/05/23/does-the-golden-ratio-look-less-beautiful-as-numbers/#comment-7728wouldn’t 1.618 have worked?
]]>By: naught101
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2008/05/23/does-the-golden-ratio-look-less-beautiful-as-numbers/#comment-7727
Sun, 01 Mar 2009 23:18:27 +0000http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2008/05/23/does-the-golden-ratio-look-less-beautiful-as-numbers/#comment-7727That’s a mighty fine serial number you’ve got there ðŸ˜‰

Trust an engineer to go for a rectangle instead of a spiral ðŸ˜€