<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Clock That Breeds</title>
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2008/10/30/the-clock-that-breeds/</link>
	<description>A blog about life, past and future. Written by DISCOVER contributing editor and columnist Carl Zimmer.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 19:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Kane</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2008/10/30/the-clock-that-breeds/#comment-12301</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Kane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 00:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2008/10/30/the-clock-that-breeds/#comment-12301</guid>
		<description>Hi Carl, 

Just a quick note to say "great article" on the clock that breeds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Carl, </p>
<p>Just a quick note to say &#8220;great article&#8221; on the clock that breeds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hej</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2008/10/30/the-clock-that-breeds/#comment-11599</link>
		<dc:creator>hej</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 14:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2008/10/30/the-clock-that-breeds/#comment-11599</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Can you explain how this does not ruin the time-keeping?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think that he meant that each bacterium had it's own clock. So if you just concentrate on one cell and ignore the other ones you see a regular blinking. And presumably they don't see each other blink, since the turning off signal was unrelated to the light.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Can you explain how this does not ruin the time-keeping?</p></blockquote>
<p>I think that he meant that each bacterium had it&#8217;s own clock. So if you just concentrate on one cell and ignore the other ones you see a regular blinking. And presumably they don&#8217;t see each other blink, since the turning off signal was unrelated to the light.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bactérias expressam um ciclo biológico sintético &#124; Rainha Vermelha</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2008/10/30/the-clock-that-breeds/#comment-11553</link>
		<dc:creator>Bactérias expressam um ciclo biológico sintético &#124; Rainha Vermelha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 22:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2008/10/30/the-clock-that-breeds/#comment-11553</guid>
		<description>[...] The Loom [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] The Loom [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bjørn Østman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2008/10/30/the-clock-that-breeds/#comment-11455</link>
		<dc:creator>Bjørn Østman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 18:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2008/10/30/the-clock-that-breeds/#comment-11455</guid>
		<description>It seems that they don't keep time so well from generation to generation. Depends on what you mean by "smoothly", I guess. They start pulsing out of sync. Can you explain how this does not ruin the time-keeping?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems that they don&#8217;t keep time so well from generation to generation. Depends on what you mean by &#8220;smoothly&#8221;, I guess. They start pulsing out of sync. Can you explain how this does not ruin the time-keeping?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
