<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You Want A Piece of This? (Please Please Please Don&#8217;t Take a Piece of This!)</title>
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2008/11/13/you-want-a-piece-of-this-please-please-please-dont-take-a-piece-of-this/</link>
	<description>A blog about life, past and future. Written by DISCOVER contributing editor and columnist Carl Zimmer.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 06:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nunca jogue truco com um carangueijo &#124; Brontossauros em meu jardim</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2008/11/13/you-want-a-piece-of-this-please-please-please-dont-take-a-piece-of-this/#comment-11943</link>
		<dc:creator>Nunca jogue truco com um carangueijo &#124; Brontossauros em meu jardim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 14:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2008/11/13/you-want-a-piece-of-this-please-please-please-dont-take-a-piece-of-this/#comment-11943</guid>
		<description>[...] Wikipedia Fonte: Science Daily, The Loom, Functional Ecology   Tags: carangueijos, Vida [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Wikipedia Fonte: Science Daily, The Loom, Functional Ecology   Tags: carangueijos, Vida [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spencer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2008/11/13/you-want-a-piece-of-this-please-please-please-dont-take-a-piece-of-this/#comment-11884</link>
		<dc:creator>spencer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 06:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2008/11/13/you-want-a-piece-of-this-please-please-please-dont-take-a-piece-of-this/#comment-11884</guid>
		<description>fascinating. thnx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fascinating. thnx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monkey</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2008/11/13/you-want-a-piece-of-this-please-please-please-dont-take-a-piece-of-this/#comment-11843</link>
		<dc:creator>Monkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 01:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2008/11/13/you-want-a-piece-of-this-please-please-please-dont-take-a-piece-of-this/#comment-11843</guid>
		<description>Excellent stuff!! Now, the question arises: What about the 2nd, 3rd, ..., nth claw regeneration? Does it continue to diminish in size? Does it reach a stable "regenerative claw size"? I would hate to think of the research that would be needed to support this, but it is a fascinating evolutionary perspective. I get similar questions about starfish and the like from my students. Any illumination on this one?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent stuff!! Now, the question arises: What about the 2nd, 3rd, &#8230;, nth claw regeneration? Does it continue to diminish in size? Does it reach a stable &#8220;regenerative claw size&#8221;? I would hate to think of the research that would be needed to support this, but it is a fascinating evolutionary perspective. I get similar questions about starfish and the like from my students. Any illumination on this one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EastwoodDC</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2008/11/13/you-want-a-piece-of-this-please-please-please-dont-take-a-piece-of-this/#comment-11839</link>
		<dc:creator>EastwoodDC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 19:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2008/11/13/you-want-a-piece-of-this-please-please-please-dont-take-a-piece-of-this/#comment-11839</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;It’s also intriguing to consider why crabs keep on trusting claw size as a reliable clue to how they’ll fare in a fight. There’s good reason to think that while the rule isn’t perfect, it works well enough. The chances are low that a male crab will encounter a bluff. It’s better to err on the side of safey in a fight than to err on the side of distrust. And so the crabs allow deception to thrive.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That is a nice balance at work. If replacement claws were more common, there would be more successful challenges of these crabs, and pressure to evolve stronger replacement claws. If crabs didn't trust the rule, they would waste energy on more challenges they cannot win. It's a sort of crustacean cost-benefit analysis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>It’s also intriguing to consider why crabs keep on trusting claw size as a reliable clue to how they’ll fare in a fight. There’s good reason to think that while the rule isn’t perfect, it works well enough. The chances are low that a male crab will encounter a bluff. It’s better to err on the side of safey in a fight than to err on the side of distrust. And so the crabs allow deception to thrive.</p></blockquote>
<p>That is a nice balance at work. If replacement claws were more common, there would be more successful challenges of these crabs, and pressure to evolve stronger replacement claws. If crabs didn&#8217;t trust the rule, they would waste energy on more challenges they cannot win. It&#8217;s a sort of crustacean cost-benefit analysis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
