<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The National Academy of Sciences Wants To Hear From You</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2008/12/19/the-national-academy-of-sciences-wants-to-hear-from-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2008/12/19/the-national-academy-of-sciences-wants-to-hear-from-you/</link>
	<description>A blog about life, past and future. Written by DISCOVER contributing editor and columnist Carl Zimmer.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 02:51:30 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul Donnelly</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2008/12/19/the-national-academy-of-sciences-wants-to-hear-from-you/comment-page-1/#comment-12977</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Donnelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 10:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2008/12/19/the-national-academy-of-sciences-wants-to-hear-from-you/#comment-12977</guid>
		<description>Brian, I suspect a combination of selection bias and the large number of options. Respondents weren&#039;t asked to rank their selections, so all we know is that Space Science and Exploration is in many people&#039;s top five. The options ranked just under it are education and a whole bunch of bio stuff that I could see certain segments of the population either not being interested in or being against. It&#039;s easy for a generally well-liked field to beat out a controversial one, even if most respondents are most passionate about another area of research.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian, I suspect a combination of selection bias and the large number of options. Respondents weren&#8217;t asked to rank their selections, so all we know is that Space Science and Exploration is in many people&#8217;s top five. The options ranked just under it are education and a whole bunch of bio stuff that I could see certain segments of the population either not being interested in or being against. It&#8217;s easy for a generally well-liked field to beat out a controversial one, even if most respondents are most passionate about another area of research.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl Zimmer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2008/12/19/the-national-academy-of-sciences-wants-to-hear-from-you/comment-page-1/#comment-12939</link>
		<dc:creator>Carl Zimmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 20:46:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2008/12/19/the-national-academy-of-sciences-wants-to-hear-from-you/#comment-12939</guid>
		<description>Cyrano: Maybe I wasn&#039;t clear--it&#039;s here: http://www.surveygizmo.com/s/85927/what-matters-most-to-you-c</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cyrano: Maybe I wasn&#8217;t clear&#8211;it&#8217;s here: <a href="http://www.surveygizmo.com/s/85927/what-matters-most-to-you-c" rel="nofollow">http://www.surveygizmo.com/s/85927/what-matters-most-to-you-c</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cyrano</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2008/12/19/the-national-academy-of-sciences-wants-to-hear-from-you/comment-page-1/#comment-12938</link>
		<dc:creator>cyrano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 20:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2008/12/19/the-national-academy-of-sciences-wants-to-hear-from-you/#comment-12938</guid>
		<description>Where&#039;s the link to take the poll? I went to the Academy site and still had no success.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where&#8217;s the link to take the poll? I went to the Academy site and still had no success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Third Bit &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The National Academy Would Like to Hear From You</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2008/12/19/the-national-academy-of-sciences-wants-to-hear-from-you/comment-page-1/#comment-12937</link>
		<dc:creator>The Third Bit &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The National Academy Would Like to Hear From You</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 19:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2008/12/19/the-national-academy-of-sciences-wants-to-hear-from-you/#comment-12937</guid>
		<description>[...] Carl Zimmer: the US National Academy of Sciences would like you to fill in a two-minute survey about what [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Carl Zimmer: the US National Academy of Sciences would like you to fill in a two-minute survey about what [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Beatty</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2008/12/19/the-national-academy-of-sciences-wants-to-hear-from-you/comment-page-1/#comment-12935</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Beatty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 19:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2008/12/19/the-national-academy-of-sciences-wants-to-hear-from-you/#comment-12935</guid>
		<description>Although I think the survey could be more detailed, I think it is really informative about what in science today interests the public. The fact that Energy is the cause of most concern isn&#039;t surprising, but I think it is surprising that space exploraiton is of more interest than healthcare costs, biodiversity and extinction, ocean health, and so many others. Even though I am actually quite interested and supportive of space exploration, I wonder why so many people find it such a high priority? 
Does anyone else have thoughts on this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I think the survey could be more detailed, I think it is really informative about what in science today interests the public. The fact that Energy is the cause of most concern isn&#8217;t surprising, but I think it is surprising that space exploraiton is of more interest than healthcare costs, biodiversity and extinction, ocean health, and so many others. Even though I am actually quite interested and supportive of space exploration, I wonder why so many people find it such a high priority?<br />
Does anyone else have thoughts on this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dick Schmidt</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2008/12/19/the-national-academy-of-sciences-wants-to-hear-from-you/comment-page-1/#comment-12933</link>
		<dc:creator>Dick Schmidt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 18:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/loom/2008/12/19/the-national-academy-of-sciences-wants-to-hear-from-you/#comment-12933</guid>
		<description>Having worked in analytical labs for 30 years, I have concluded that science has been reduced to poorly understood &quot;models&quot; which at best are wild guesses about a particular subject.  The most worrysome are the climate models which attempt to explain a system which is so complicated that there is no way to account for all the variables that need to be included in the models.  I have the distinct feeling the some of the folks have an agenda and are not really interested in the truth.  I call them &quot;Chicken Littles&quot;.  I happen to believe that this earth is a lot more robust than we give it credit for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having worked in analytical labs for 30 years, I have concluded that science has been reduced to poorly understood &#8220;models&#8221; which at best are wild guesses about a particular subject.  The most worrysome are the climate models which attempt to explain a system which is so complicated that there is no way to account for all the variables that need to be included in the models.  I have the distinct feeling the some of the folks have an agenda and are not really interested in the truth.  I call them &#8220;Chicken Littles&#8221;.  I happen to believe that this earth is a lot more robust than we give it credit for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
