3quarkdaily just picked up my little rant about an awful piece of science writing. They accompanied their post with a picture of the scientist profiled in the article, Hina Chaudhry. That juxtaposition made me a bit queasy–let me just make clear that I was not criticizing Dr. Chaudhry, just the article about her. Dr. Chaudhry is doing what scientists should: running experiments and getting her results published in peer-reviewed journals. Here’s a free link to a 2007 paper of hers on regenerating heart tissue. It’s up to us science writers in turn to find a better way to describe a scientist than as a “a pretty lady.”













January 20th, 2009 at 11:04 am
This article honestly reminded me of the way the futuristic news anchors spoke in the movie Idiocracy. Bizarre, bizarre writing.
January 20th, 2009 at 11:05 am
the article referenced, that is
January 22nd, 2009 at 4:32 pm
Yes, thank you. That article was so painful to read. It’s really a shame because Chaudhry’s research sounds interesting and innovative.