Comments on: Does Darwinius Exist, Revisited: The Official Word Is…Not Yet.

By: Stella Gomez

Stella Gomez — Tue, 26 May 2009 21:09:07 +0000

“nomenclaturally” is an excellent word.

By: Weekly PLoS Blog and Media Round-up « everyONE – the PLoS ONE community blog

Fri, 22 May 2009 23:51:08 +0000

[...] at: The Loom, Fish matters, Lancelet, Why Evolution Is True, Chinleana, Chinleana, DinoGoss, The Loom, The Loom, Fish [...]

By: Darwinius: what’s at issue? « Why Evolution Is True

Darwinius: what’s at issue? « Why Evolution Is True — Fri, 22 May 2009 01:43:25 +0000

[...] While I was writing this, Carl Zimmer got a reply from the Executive Secretary of the ICZN. She confirms that posting on Plosone does not make a name nomenclaturally available. The issue of [...]

By: Darwinius: Named at Last! | The Loom | Discover Magazine

Darwinius: Named at Last! | The Loom | Discover Magazine — Fri, 22 May 2009 00:12:51 +0000

[...] the executive secretary of the ICZN used the Loom to confirm that, yes, Darwinius was not yet [...]

By: Mike

Mike — Thu, 21 May 2009 16:32:21 +0000

Its ironic that the organization that honored Forrest Mims (Discover magazine and associated blogs) has no mention of the recognition being given Eugenie Scott. http://pandasthumb.org/archives/2009/05/genie-scott-hon.html#comments

By: Brian Axsmith

Brian Axsmith — Thu, 21 May 2009 16:31:37 +0000

All they have to do is follow the example of Paleontogia Electonica. See http://palaeo-electronica.org/

By: Does Darwinius Exist? | The Loom | Discover Magazine

Does Darwinius Exist? | The Loom | Discover Magazine — Thu, 21 May 2009 16:03:21 +0000

[...] #5: The ICZN Executive Secretary has given me the official word. Read here for the [...]