Swine Flu Science: First Wiki, Then Publish

By Carl Zimmer | June 11, 2009 9:38 am

Here’s a vision of how science may work in the future.

Last month I scrambled to write a story about the evolution of swine flu for the New York Times. I talked to some of the top experts on the evolution of viruses who were, at that very moment, analyzing the genetic material in samples of the virus isolated around the world. One scientist, whom I reached at home, said, “Sure, I’ve got a little time. I’m just making some coffee while my computer crunches some swine flu. What’s up?”

All of the scientists were completely open with me. They didn’t wave me off because they had to wait until their results were published in a big journal. In fact, they were open with the whole world, posting all their results in real-time on a wiki. So everyone who wanted to peruse their analysis could see how it developed as more data emerged and as they used different methods to analyze it.

Now, a little over a month later, they’re publishing their results in the journal Nature. Normally we press folks would get a press release about the paper a week before publication, and it would be under strict embargo till it appeared in the journal. This morning, however, I got a press release pointing me to the published paper. And while Nature normally requires you to subscribe to read a paper, the flu paper is published under a Creative Commons license, which means anyone can get it and use it under the license’s terms.

While that’s all very exciting, the paper itself is an anxiety-triggering read. The new swine flu (which the authors now call S-IOV S-OIV) is only distantly related to other known swine flus, which means that there are a lot of flu viruses circulating around about which we know very little. And, as I mentioned in my article, it had already entered the human population several months before it came to light earlier this spring. Be sure to check out figure 1 (I’m inserting it below from the wiki–thanks, Creative Commons!), which shows how lots of bird, swine, and human season flu viruses mixed together to produce the new beast. The authors warn that the pattern of evolution they see is the sort of pattern the big flu pandemics followed when they emerged in the past.

With this sort of urgent situation at hand, the patient process of old-fashioned science publishing may have to be upgraded.

[Image: CDC]

Comments (14)

  1. This is exactly the sort of situation the Internet is perfect for — keeping scientists in communication with very rapid sharing of information. The wiki model is wonderful in this context.

    How do they address the problem of filtering: how do you let everyone who needs access to the information get it, without getting swamped by people with nothing to contribute? I assume this wiki is invitation-only, or private in some way. But that means people in unrelated fields who might have useful information or insights can’t contribute. How do they balance this?

    Carl: I should clarify–Only the co-authors of the paper could post to this wiki. But every step in their research is documented–was documented, actually, as it happened.

  2. Great development of course.. I just have one question, did the authors have to pay in order for Nature to publish to print it under a creative commons license? Like the authors have to do when publishing in PLoS?

  3. m.

    Scientific research is funded by tax dollars and should be made public domain anyway. I don’t see anything great about this being published under the creative commons license. It’s what should be happening anyway.

  4. Know of any other free resources for medical research? I can’t bring myself to pay $20 to read a paper.

  5. Im a bit annoyed about this whole swine flu thing! What about the poor with malaria? That is definitely killing more people… http://bit.ly/3s9FRD

NEW ON DISCOVER
OPEN
CITIZEN SCIENCE
ADVERTISEMENT

Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!

The Loom

A blog about life, past and future. Written by DISCOVER contributing editor and columnist Carl Zimmer.

About Carl Zimmer

Carl Zimmer writes about science regularly for The New York Times and magazines such as DISCOVER, which also hosts his blog, The LoomHe is the author of 12 books, the most recent of which is Science Ink: Tattoos of the Science Obsessed.

ADVERTISEMENT

See More

ADVERTISEMENT
Collapse bottom bar
+

Login to your Account

X
E-mail address:
Password:
Remember me
Forgot your password?
No problem. Click here to have it e-mailed to you.

Not Registered Yet?

Register now for FREE. Registration only takes a few minutes to complete. Register now »